Thank you for banning my account 'Marauder Olaf' for intentional feeding, which is true. You made me care enough to write you feedback in an obnoxious manner. As I do not even have the opportunity to explain my reasoning. Justice without court?
In case Riot is interested in why a player would feed, that is because my own team can ban my champion pick. However, as an individual I must retaliate through either cooperation or equivalent retribution, the latter is better known as tit for tat. I choose the latter and got banned for my rational. Which is ironic because that 'zero-tolerance' policy is exactly the decision making I applied. Double standard, or justice through authority? Perhaps trivial?
Perhaps making it impossible for team players to ban locked-in pre-picked champions in team-select would fore-go the agony of such tribulation on these terribly important matters of gaming.
A. A. Anonymous