Rioter Comments
Hydnoras (EUW)
: >Flawed system? More like flawed community, but im also a part of it as we speak and so are you. You design the system for that community so it is indeed a flawed system and not a flawed community in this case, even if people are never flawless. You design the system to account for that as much as possible. >This is the point of it al. Even if there arent many players that are grown up enough to admit and accept a defeat, or that the opponents skills are better, there still are! And in a system like this (my idea of system), giving a true honor to the enemy would be more valuable than getting all 4 from your teammates. But that is not a good system. If a huge portion of the community is the kind that i described (note i didn't say majority), then the system shouldn't exist because it's no longer an accurate representation of honor (even less so than the current one). >And in a system like this (my idea of system), giving a true honor to the enemy would be more valuable than getting all 4 from your teammates. And just like that you would devalue honor and just make people always honor the enemy because they get the greatest benefit from doing that. One honor shouldn't be more valuable than another (unless premades are concerned). >Remeber, honor is not to get, but to give. I know that, you however, already forgot it since you suggested that you would gain honor progress by honoring an enemy. That is getting honor, even if you are giving at the same time but you are most likely giving it for the wrong reasons.
When i said higher value, i didnt mean actual value, i meant theoretical value. I dont think they design the system to the community. Thats just a poor excuse for "its Riot's fault, not ours". But dont go too deep into that. Im not saying this community is completely bad, it just has flaws (just as everything else). It is true, however, that if a system is misused, it is understandable for Riot to change or remove it, but it doesnt mean they design it to the community's will.
Hydnoras (EUW)
: Could be but there is no point in doing it just for when you lose. True honor shows in defeat, not in victory. The other system that would let you commend enemies in both cases is still a much better solution. Same principle but not abusable. It also must be a system that doesn't show to other players just like honor currently so people don't get marked as trolls like they did with the old honor system. >That would really show that if a player was a worthy foe, and it was an honor to be defeated by him. In reality, people would either honor the enemy because they don't want to honor their "bad" team even if someone in their team deserved it, or they don't honor at all because honoring an enemy is basically admitting he is better which is something a competitive player doesn't like to do. So all in all a flawed system.
Flawed system? More like flawed community, but im also a part of it as we speak and so are you. >honoring an enemy is basically admitting he is better This is the point of it al. Even if there arent many players that are grown up enough to admit and accept a defeat, or that the opponents skills are better, there still are! And in a system like this (my idea of system), giving a true honor to the enemy would be more valuable than getting all 4 from your teammates. "Honor shows in defeat" is exactly what I mean by this idea. Remeber, honor is not to get, but to give.
: Buddy ,I can carry in gold with any role,people are vegetables there. People don't actually have the mechanics to stop you from snowballing in there ,not gonna talk about how to play their roles. In diamond people are not gods ,you could say some are good ,but they actually know how to do things and their mechanics are not bad. You're talking about another game, sorry.
"Im a Diamond, you Golds dont even deserve to look upon me" - Every Diamond or higher player
: Diamond made me quit the game
So you are a Dia player but you believe that the champ is what matters? Also, if you feel like you cant win, take a break. No one makes you play this game, and if you just "go next" after every tilting lose, you will just keep carrying the heat to more players. Or if it's not you being tilted, but your team, dont give them advices, just suggest that they should take a break.
Hydnoras (EUW)
: This has been suggested a million times already and for the millionth time it will be shot down again. Riot wants to have a system that let's you commend your enemies but honor is not the way to go because of the huge amount of abuse cases it would have. A lot of people will honor trolls in the enemy team that give them a free win in ranked for example (happened a lot during the old honor system and is the reason that option was removed). That would mean a troll would get honor progress etc which is something that should never happen. So there might be a system like that in the future, just not in the form of honor.
What if you could only honor enemies if you lost? That would really show that if a player was a worthy foe, and it was an honor to be defeated by him. I mean, its logical, since, if the enemy has a troll, you will most likely win, or if they had a troll and you lost, there woudlnt be a point to honor a troll that earned a free win that he didnt paritcipate in. In every form of battle or game, its usually the winner side that holds honor. If they add this option, im sure it wont be abused in a wrong way.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Lester the (EUNE)
: In my opinion, this rework is just WAY too over-the-top. As it stands right now, Olaf is not in *that* bad of a spot right now. Now, I'm going to go through the abilities. Q:Way too excessive. The root would be really weird and awkward to try and land, and I just can't see why Olaf would be able to call his axe back. W:That's just a mixup of Fiora's and Jax's abilities. The part where an AA is parried in the end would cause a stun, would be really really REALLY weird, since he could just use this ability to just run down any ADC. Yes, this is worse than Jax's E, but you have to count in, that let's say there is a Jhin, who AA's in the end of the channel. He get's stunned. Then Olaf uses his Q + E, maybe R combo. The Jhin is dead for autoattacking the Olaf. E:This is like the old E. R:Those resistance reductions seem kinda big. Also, this would be a HUGE counter to Pyke (witch is kinda needed not going to lie here), and since the gold is given ONLY to the killer, there would be an **insane** crapstorm in the lover levels of LoL competetive play (Bronze-Gold). Also, he can basically counter his own ultimate in so many different ways. Unless it's a true execute (Goes through revives), then it can be countered with= Guardian Angel. Zilean ultimate. Kindred ultimate. Kayle ultimate. Taric ultimate. But yeah, those were my main problems with this champion concept. Please, don't take this as an offense. I really do apprecieate that you are willing to take the time out of your day to just think up a champion rework like this! But I'll be going, maybe see you in the rift!
> Q:Way too excessive. The root would be really weird and awkward to try and land, and I just can't see why Olaf would be able to call his axe back. Excessive compared to what? His kit rn is really low. When Riot develops a rework, they try to make it outstanding, and unique. It can be similar to something already existing, but always has hold something new and unique. His current Q is a weak target access spell (well, it slowes with a lot, but if missed, he has nothing else) Most weapons in nordic myth return to their owners on their will, the point of this is to make it unique. And dont forget that its a rework, completely new, anything can be done. > W:That's just a mixup of Fiora's and Jax's abilities. The part where an AA is parried in the end would cause a stun, would be really really REALLY weird, since he could just use this ability to just run down any ADC. Yes, this is worse than Jax's E, but you have to count in, that let's say there is a Jhin, who AA's in the end of the channel. He get's stunned. Then Olaf uses his Q + E, maybe R combo. The Jhin is dead for autoattacking the Olaf. We already have many mixup abilities, and i think this one is not the worst one. And what is the problem with running down an adc? Jax's E-Q combo is waay more broken and effective than this one, and this has to be timed well and works only while facing enemies. I dont understand your problem with E vs ADC. I think it should be more effective vs meele, especially empowered autoattacks (Darius W, Garen Q, ect.) If he would really get a rework, his appearance and kit must be changed. He doesnt have any iconic weapons at the moment that has to be left untouched (like Aatrox's sword, or Akali's schyte thingy). Vikings were more likely to wield a roundshield+axe than a dual axe. And since he would get a shield, you have to get the most out of it. Vikings used roundshields, and roundshields are for parrying mainly. > E:This is like the old E. Im sorry, but did you not read it? There will always be spells that remain similar to the old ones. And again, vikings commonly used axes, and axes are overly effective vs shields, because you can exert more force on the target with an axe strike. Also, axes can hook down shields, leaving the opponent off guard. The point of this spell is, stands in its name, Shieldbreaker. > R:Those resistance reductions seem kinda big. Also, this would be a HUGE counter to Pyke (witch is kinda needed not going to lie here), and since the gold is given ONLY to the killer, there would be an insane crapstorm in the lover levels of LoL competetive play (Bronze-Gold). Also, he can basically counter his own ultimate in so many different ways. Unless it's a true execute (Goes through revives), then it can be countered with= Guardian Angel. Zilean ultimate. Kindred ultimate. Kayle ultimate. Taric ultimate The resistance reductions are massive, so he is more likely to die before its over. This also makes players stack up as much resistance as they can, so they dont become that squishy. And its mainly for his character. Unlike Trynda denying death (simply by meing angry) he welcomes it, and makes sure to get the most out of his final moments. Again, you have to focus on maiing new. We have soo many execute spells, but do we have a self execute? I know it sounds stupid and needless, but if you can build a character/kit around it, could be felt in place. But in my vision, the main potential of his ultimate is de after-death cast, which requires the stacks. So, it would only be accessed in mid-late game. Also, I imagine him being a full tank jungler. In the jungle, you can acces early drakes, and any kill all around the map. I wish you could point out something helpful. The opinions you pointed out are not realy useful remarks. And again, remember, its a rework, anything can be done, until it adds something new to the game. And recent reworks/new champs didnt add anything new really (not to talk about that thing we call Aatrox rework). Hooks, dashes, perma cc. The game needs a new and unique mechanics-required element (like Urgot rework)
: What's done is done
It feels so bad, and what was happy now is sad (please get the reference)
TERRØR (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Furiranda,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=8WFKu2QB,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2018-08-26T06:59:37.614+0000) > > For some reason 2-1 rate of surrender is not enough. Out toplaner kept voting No, so, what can we do :/. Oh and lets not forget, not only we had 2 afk, our Talon was treathening us with him going afk as well if we dont surrender. > > The only reason we didnt remake is, well, because none of us wanted, and also, ironically, the game before this game was a 4v5 on our side, and we won. > > I also think lux did the right thing, but i just cant risk getting low prior. Getting into a game, and the game itself already takes so long, i dotn wanna wait even more time befor i can queue up. starbucks is hiring
>starbucks is hiring Uhm, am i supposed to get it?
Rioter Comments
: 1. You can report the enemy team, they will prob get punished for it. 2. If they trash-talked in-game as well- /mute all 3. early ff vote is available in 15 minutes, 20 for 2/3 to surrender 4. Even though you say it's just a normal game - remake it, it usually won't be worth your time, and you won't enjoy it that much. 5. IMO (THIS IS MY OPINION-NOT YOURS) Your lux probably did the right thing -sometimes being labeled as leaver is worth. heck, people are doing it in ranked game when they see they don't have a chance. I'm not tolerating that behavior but it's probably for the best.
For some reason 2-1 rate of surrender is not enough. Out toplaner kept voting No, so, what can we do :/. Oh and lets not forget, not only we had 2 afk, our Talon was treathening us with him going afk as well if we dont surrender. The only reason we didnt remake is, well, because none of us wanted, and also, ironically, the game before this game was a 4v5 on our side, and we won. I also think lux did the right thing, but i just cant risk getting low prior. Getting into a game, and the game itself already takes so long, i dotn wanna wait even more time befor i can queue up.
Rioter Comments
RogueDek (EUW)
: Voidborn Zoe skin concept.
Zoe + Tentacles? Hell yes!
Rioter Comments
Cypherous (EUW)
: > My CPU is massive enough to handle this Right but what GPU do you have, as thats what is actually rendering the two displays, what resolutions are these monitors running at, its entirely possible you're just running in to a bottlenecking issue, youtube videos are generally a much lower framerate than a live game stream
I play Dark Souls I while on loading screen, so the GPU couldnt be a problem
Rioter Comments

Furiranda

Level 32 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion