: i cant get my account back?
I would like to point out that ALL league of legends accounts are property of Riot games. We only have a licence that gives us the right to use them. A licence we got by signing a contract(by pressing the "YES" button on "DO YOU ACCEPT?") Technically speaking, you gave away something that doesn't belong to you and that breaks the contract. You're out of luck brah.
Afelers (EUNE)
: You have never been killed by a single right click from a Draven, have you? The passive nerf just delayed that horror a tiny bit, did not erase it.
I for one REALLY love how people are complaining about him now but not before his passive rework. Back when he had wicked blades, I never and I mean NEVER saw anyone complain about him on the forums, in-game or anywhere for that matter. Draven is already in a pretty "meh" spot because he essentially doesn't have a passive. Or I mean, he does but he needs to activate it with kills. You don't give kills to draven, boom. Draven useless. Its not THAT hard to understand. Oh and, don't complain about Draven if you aren't building to counter him. Death's dance, ninja tabi, Phantom dancer and guardian angel will do wonders against any AA physical based champion like Draven. Besides, do not forget that Draven also still has bugs that aren't fixed yet, just like with mordekaiser. And if draven does get a damage nerf. Riot will be forced to switch that power over to somewhere else. They take power from his Q, well then they have to give that power to another part of his kit except his ultimate(because his ult is also bugged with the whole "axes not returning when draven dies". And riot tries to play this off as an intentional change haha).
Enjutsu (EUNE)
: Well it is a market for Riot to tap into, probably an issue for them would be to create a cross platform, i think that would be quite essential for them, have doubts if it could function only for xbox players alone, i'd imagine they would still be quite a minority, which would create matchmaking issues.
It wouldn't be too hard to cross platform PC and Xbox. Its already been done on Rocket league with Playstation and PC so I doubt it will be any harder. It might take time yes but it wouldn't be "THAT" difficult.
: we discussed it 2 hours ago. technically a world is a beautiful place to live in too :D
True that. I will sip the tip of my tea for it.
: Janitor Jax
The skin technically speaking already exists as a custom skin. "Very serious full AP jax". Google that.
Foxynerdy (EUW)
: The capsule you get from honor is...so underwhelming.
I can kind of agree. Somewhat at least. The honor capsules should NOT contain champions shards. We already have the hextech champion shards for that. Not to mention in the vanilla cases you can get champions shards already. Being honorable is a given. That's how you should act. But Riot is literally telling us that "Be on your best behavior and you will get this rare and cool capsule containing VERY rare skins". And then of course, proceed to give us champion shards. Which isn't cool at all. I'm all for letting Riot keep the capsule the way it is right now but in the future I hope they won't overhype sh¤t like this again. you overhype us for the very strong possibility of getting a champion shard. Gee thanks I guess.
: +++ be sure to not say anything that might hurt their feelings though, because #tolerance and #lovetrumphates, and then YOU would have to be banned for ruining the experience
Ugh, that's another thing I hate. I can't in proper and "non-hateful" terms speak my mind about how people who break the rules are ruining the game. "Excuse me, but your behavior isn't in line with the league's summoner's code and it is kind of ruining the match for me. Could you please stop it" ^is enough to get a report.
: Why saying "gg ez" is unsportsmanlike
Unsportsmanlike yes but not reportable. Not anymore at least. Hell, even Riot's new client agrees on it as there is no "report for unsportsmanlike behavior" anymore. I still report it for negative attitude though. Not that it helps as it isn't the right category therefore its ineffective.
: > [{quoted}](name=Hailey Hayato,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=xIAfG2Ej,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2017-08-26T14:55:31.982+0000) > > "We here at Riot games take care of ALL our players, ESPECIALLY the A-holes". Could not have said it better myself. Only on here is the privacy of "criminals" more protected than everyone else :')
And you know what the worst part is? Even if you have {{champion:54}} evidence of a player inting, trolling. Evidence that (IF it was a court case) would win you the court 100% it wouldn't matter.
Doomley (EUW)
: No you can't put any pics or videos or anything here that reveals his identity. https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us write a support ticket there. It worked for me just fine.
"We here at Riot games take care of ALL our players, ESPECIALLY the A-holes".
Haunted (EUW)
: Communicating vs flaming
Actually, asking for a report in allchat when you haven't flamed or trashtalked beforehand is Semi-OK, borderline reportable. Just hovering at the edge of being reportable but still not actually reportable. And you can't report or be reported for the 3rd point. If you for example have someone on your team who spam pings 24/7 and you mute them. You can't then report them for not communicating. You do have a point though. You CAN tell your team that their actions are costly mistakes for your team. Its HOW you tell them that determines if its flaming or not. "OMG bot ping missing ffs" <-- can qualify as flaming. Note: I said it CAN, NOT that it HAVE to. "Botlane, if the enemy is MIA please call it via chat or ping :)" <-- Not flaming.
Rioter Comments
messy1876 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hailey Hayato,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Vd1MJuHQ,comment-id=000100000000000000000001,timestamp=2017-08-20T09:16:01.233+0000) > > It is VERY obvious that you either can&#x27;t read or only read whatever seems to fit your agenda. I specifically said and I QUOTE: &quot;BUT SO FAR, EVERY SINGLE PERSON I&#x27;VE TALKED WITH ABOUT ARURF...&quot; > > So far, up until talking WITH YOU. Every other person i&#x27;ve talked with that IS NOT YOU has agreed with me. You are obviously twisting my words to suit your own needs. > The moment you responded to me you were talking to me. Therefore you were talking to someone who disagreed with you, this means i am correct. There is no twisting of words here. > 2nd. Even if ARURF was created with that purpose in mind it still fails to deliver the &quot;better&quot; experience. In my opinion, &quot;Blind with bans&quot; urf was the best of all modes so far. The strongest champions with little to no counterplay was banned(I;E Ryze). 6 more champions who were &quot;stronger than average&quot; was then banned by the players and the rest was playable. > That is an opinion not shared by the majority of the community as you can see by riot changing to arurf to appease the majority. > 3rd: My point about lethality is that it makes ARURF more unfun than it already is. Because being one, literally one-shot against a J4 or Wukong when you can&#x27;t even retaliate is unhealthy even for a &quot;fun&quot; game mode. Riot banned Sona and Ryze from ARURF for being unhealthy. > As i have already said this is a problem with the item not arurf. > Finally, I do realize I can use the &quot;quote&quot; feature but I feel as if that would be unnecessary as you would only read what you want to read and ignore the rest. I am simply responding to what you have writen. Im using the quote feature between responses so that its clear to you what im responding to. You are correct, i do not respond to everything you say, like the comment about riot being hypocrites as this has nothing to do with me. There are also some points you repeat for seemingly no reason, so i simply dont bother responding to them.
> [{quoted}](name=messy1876,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Vd1MJuHQ,comment-id=0001000000000000000000010000,timestamp=2017-08-20T12:06:09.684+0000) > > The moment you responded to me you were talking to me. Therefore you were talking to someone who disagreed with you, this means i am correct. There is no twisting of words here. If this isn't twisting my words then what is? You aren't listening to what I was saying. The moment i spoke with you as someone who disagreed is true yes but UP UNTIL THIS POINT, BEFORE SPEAKING WITH YOU, everyone I PREVIOUSLY spoke with, you know. Prior to SPEAKING WITH YOU, everyone i spoke with agreed with me. I am sorry for using all caps but I need to MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND PROPERLY. Now keep going on how you aren't twisting my words when you are doing exactly that.
messy1876 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hailey Hayato,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Vd1MJuHQ,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-19T20:58:55.740+0000) > > Not everyone considers it a problem, true. But so far, every. Single. Person. I&#x27;ve talked with about ARURF agreed that it takes away the fun factor from a &quot;FUN&quot; game mode. Well since you replied to me this simply isnt true, as you are talking to me and i do not agree. > ARURF is a toxic iteration of URF that takes away the fun factor. > Arurf was created due to the high volume of complaints that people were only seeing a small number of champions each game. The fact is there is a wider variety of champions being played now in arurf than there was in urf. > I remember back when URF was released. EVERYONE I ever played urf with AND against always had a blast aside from that 1%. Didn&#x27;t matter who won or lost. We all still had sh%tload of fun. > Yes, when it was originally released. But when it came back there was a high volume of complaints for the point mentioned above. > But Riot being Riot knows how to take the fun away, even when it comes to FUN gamemodes. Hell, have you seen the lethality abuse? Its practically impossible to escape. This isnt even about arurf, this is a complaint about an item you feel is imbalanced.
It is VERY obvious that you either can't read or only read whatever seems to fit your agenda. I specifically said and I QUOTE: "BUT SO FAR, EVERY SINGLE PERSON I'VE TALKED WITH ABOUT ARURF..." So far, up until talking WITH YOU. Every other person i've talked with that IS NOT YOU has agreed with me. You are obviously twisting my words to suit your own needs. 2nd. Even if ARURF was created with that purpose in mind it still fails to deliver the "better" experience. In my opinion, "Blind with bans" urf was the best of all modes so far. The strongest champions with little to no counterplay was banned(I;E Ryze). 6 more champions who were "stronger than average" was then banned by the players and the rest was playable. Not a perfect mode but it sure as hell did it better than ARURF. Take someone like me, I have every single champion unlocked. This means that I have an equal chance of getting every champion in the game. But there are players out there with accounts who only have the strongest "URF" champions unlocked. Manipulating the game via a loophole. Effectively deciding the match before it starts. That's also a problem with ARURF. Games are decided in champ select. And you aren't even in control. 3rd: My point about lethality is that it makes ARURF more unfun than it already is. Because being one, literally one-shot against a J4 or Wukong when you can't even retaliate is unhealthy even for a "fun" game mode. Riot banned Sona and Ryze from ARURF for being unhealthy. I don't see them removing lethality items which contradicts their intentions. Effectively making them hypocrites in their own right. Finally, I do realize I can use the "quote" feature but I feel as if that would be unnecessary as you would only read what you want to read and ignore the rest.
messy1876 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Afelers,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Vd1MJuHQ,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2017-08-19T16:36:05.326+0000) > > Ignoring the existence of a problem will not fix it. Not everyone considers it a problem tho.
Not everyone considers it a problem, true. But so far, every. Single. Person. I've talked with about ARURF agreed that it takes away the fun factor from a "FUN" game mode. Being forced into playing something random isn't fun, ESPECIALLY when you come up against something like a fizz or Zed that wrecks you no matter how hard you try. Being forced into playing a champion for 20+ minutes against something broken isn't fun. Same goes the other way around. It isn't fun for the enemy to be slaughtered. ARURF is a toxic iteration of URF that takes away the fun factor. I remember back when URF was released. EVERYONE I ever played urf with AND against always had a blast aside from that 1%. Didn't matter who won or lost. We all still had sh%tload of fun. But Riot being Riot knows how to take the fun away, even when it comes to FUN gamemodes. Hell, have you seen the lethality abuse? Its practically impossible to escape.
: Ahh, I see. Well, I am still not sure if it really works that way or if it's just something people say to calm eachother. I really can't imagine that Riot's team is big enough to check every report, because actually I talked about that quite a lot with my friends already and we all said that we have at least one negative player per game in average who we report. And I've also heard several times that people later on added reported players to ask them if they got any punishments. Mostly they didn't. Of course I am only talking about obvious insults here, not things like "uninstall" etc. which is also toxic in my opinion, but debatable. So I really hope that it is as you say, but I kinda have my doubts.
But you also need to keep in mind that if you are premade with 1+(1 player or more) then your reports all count as one. So if you 4man queue on whatever mode allows it and report your 5th player for being toxic(if he was) then all your 4 reports counts as 1 instead. And I am talking from experience. I see this notification more than Mr green "Shiwah" says it appears. Rarely does the note show up but I wouldn't define the amount i've seen it as "rarely". I'd say its more in line with "common" really though I guess that it depends on the player? Could be a factor that needs to be considered as well.
: So you're saying quite the opposite of what the Riot Support and some other players say. For me it also feels like if I don't get a notification, then my report has accomplished nothing too. I also can't imagine that the amount of daily incoming reports can be all checked anyway, so Riot just says "one report is enough for us to control it" while other players now just repeat their words, but nothing really happens.
You misunderstood what i said. I said if you don't get a notification then YOUR report has done nothing. Just because your report didn't accomplish anything doesn't mean everyone else's report didn't either. My report on X player might not get him banned or reviewed for punishment but your report might.
: > Unfortunately I am sure that most of them I reported didn't recieve any punishments How can you be so sure about that? There is litteraly no way to know, except for your biased assumption. > I am against flaming other people, but I actually never started the toxicity. It doesn't matter who started. It's very simple. You break the rules -> You get punished. > Where I come from, flaming people who are flaming you is called self-defence and in real life you don't get ANY punishments for defending yourself. Except that you are not defending yourself, but retaliating. Defending yourself in League means that you use the mute button. We are not here where you come from but in the world of LoL, so other rules count here. Retaliating doesn't improve the situation in any way, so it's quite ineffective. It might only cause you to be offended even more. > Riot should focus on banning accounts of racist people and notorious flamers Riot already punishes racism and such harsher than other kinds of toxicity. Normal toxicity is punished with chat restrictions, whereas more severe offenses are escalated directly to a ban.
MIght I add that every single time you report someone and that someone later gets punished. You will be notified from within the client. If you don't get a notification, your report has accomplished nothing.
: I just found out that i have cancer.
You probably got it because of the community, wouldn't surprise me Edit: All jokes aside, i hope everything goes well for you :).
: Permane ban because MY 2 teammates tilted me really hard,go look at chat before you ban someone.
Doomley (EUW)
: Take it easy man.
https://az616578.vo.msecnd.net/files/responsive/embedded/any/desktop/2015/10/09/635800176598182836-1198077097_20130915-190532.jpg
archerno1 (EUNE)
: 14 days for something so minor?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPVaDaynNKM
Rioter Comments
: add something to Karthus Ultimate
Nah. Would be better if they added the scream Voice line(In his pentakill skin he has a voice line where he screams) when he ults instead.
: i honestly can't handle the flame anymore
So put out the candle then :)?
True Sight (EUNE)
: Permanent bans are never lifted, get over it fanboy
This response is unnecessary and rude. If I have to watch my tongue on the boards then you should too. The original poster never said he was a fanboy. He explicitly stated " He deserves that ban 100%". Shh, you hear that? Is that your eye doctor calling? No? Too bad cause you sure could use a visit. BURN! BURN!{{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
PakaGaming (EUNE)
: UnBan BakaPrase
It doesn't matter if you spend money on RP or how long you play the game. He broke the terms of use and service AS WELL AS the Summoner's code. Besides, he spent 7 years and a buttload of money on a league account that doesn't belong to him, ALL league accounts legally speaking are owned by Riot. And it "Stupid man's terms". Riot can do whatever they want with the accounts because the accounts belong to Riot.
: Ryze & Sona banned in ARURF?
Ryze and Sona are both banned from URF. But then we have Master Yi with his Q running around. Tryndamere with his infinite ult. Vayne with infinite stealth during the ult duration. Riven with endless Q-E combo making her IMPOSSIBLE to catch with champions who doesn't have any mobility. Hell, even with mobility champions I doubt you could catch her. Riot games reeks of hypocrisy and it is disgusting as hell. There are more examples than the ones i mentioned ^above, but this only goes to show that Riot are too stupid and too blind to think and see the actual problems. They are essentially the vegetable in school that no one wants to be in contact with but you HAVE to because he has the latest cool junk to show off and lets you borrow.
: It is not like Karthus will just camp in his base the entire game only to spamm his ult, just kill him, if you play an AP Mage, buy Banshee's, it got a 30 second cooldown, if you are a tank, then you don't need to worry anyways, if you arean ADC or Assassin buy Zhonyas or Edge of the Night, thats how easy it is, you can also take Bareer which has shorter CD than his Ult
Don't forget how Banshee's and EoN works. They can only be "used" outside of combat. And that's pretty much 90% of URF.
: But she got alot of mobility and basically a constant heal and shield, and with Rylais you will be permaslowed, Karthus at least has 0 mobility and 0 spells to heal or shield himself
Why you speak of Karthus as if he was easily killed is beyond me. Yes he is easy to kill but that's not the point. He has a global ult and if you get a champion that doesn't use edge of night you are going to have a bad time. Banshee's veil isn't going to help either. It has what, a 40 second CD of you not taking any damage to activate the veil. Karthus's ult has around 40'ish seconds too. NOTE: I am not 100% sure about Banshee's. Please take that into consideration. Thank you. There's no way you will be able to defend yourself against his ult when he uses it. You will just have to tank it. Over and over and over and over.
Solash (EUW)
: Yeah no, people were complaining about balancing in standard URF just as much. More so actually
A minority of players then. As far as I'm concerned, every single player I've encountered that complained about ARURF spoke of the lack of freedom and forced decisions(I;E Not being able to pick and play what you want). And then a few more people are complaining about why certain champions aren't permanently banned in ARURF as they were in URF. Karthus for example can still ult every 40 and most of the time there is little to nothing you can do about it. Getting edge of night is kinda good but most of the time you won't have a character that supports the item(AD based champions). Getting a lucky pick such as FIzz or someone else that can dodge damage isn't reliable here as you can't choose yourself. And getting edge of night on Ahri or Zyra isn't the best idea either. URF games where decided on WHO was the better player. ARURF games are decided in champion select and THAT is what people hate. We have little to NO power in controlling who will win and lose a ARURF match as its essentially decided for us by the system that conveniently always gives one team an advantage and the other team a disadvantage. Never have I seen ARAM or ARURF matches be even.
AlenAngi (EUW)
: I challenge you
I deny your challenge.
: There are some problems, but I wanna have fun in this mode so why no normal urf? :(
That's my point exactly man. These modes like URF or One For All are meant to be fun, but Riot's "design choices" takes that fun away. Its not fun to be forced into playing X champion who is weak against "insert Y OP URF champion here". If they want to keep the all random factor then I'm all for that but at least give us a ban phase so we can remove the more toxic champions such as Karthus who ults you every minute or so.
: Yea, no fun, riot, riot, your decisions are so bad, it makes me sad.
I am saying Riot's decisions are bad because they ARE bad. Or maybe you haven't been keeping up with the updated Duskblade and how strong that was. Or when they buffed lethality after introducing it. Or Leblanc and Xin on release. The many issues with the new client once they launched it. The introduction of keystones(particulary Thunderlords). Yasuo's release. The list goes on and on.
: lol i just played against him and he's so easy to play against u just buy t1 boots and run around with no care in the world
That was just one example. There are a lot more champions that makes the game unfair. Karthus used to be broken op in URF until Edge of night was introduced. My point is that ARURF is unfair. I've played two games so far and both times we were vastly outclassed because of the champions we got. (On a side note: Red ward no longer reveals twitch stealthed. So yeah there's that). If they are going to keep the all random mode then they should at least give us the ban phase back. I'm pretty damn tired of facing Zed over and over and over again. Last time ARURF was here, Zed was in 80% of the matches I played. I rarely did NOT see him. Same thing goes with practically every broken champion that you can't do anything against. Its a mode that we wait an entire year to get and when we get it I expect to have at least a SHRED of fun but No. Riot is denying me even that. I can't have fun in 3v3, 5v5 blind, draft or ranked. The only outlet I get to have fun in when it comes to league is the game modes. And I'm not allowed to have fun here either anymore. Its getting tiresome.
: Its all random
And Karthus was permabanned when URF was first released for a reason.
Rioter Comments
iVisualHD (EUW)
: V7.16 - Double Farsight Alteration Without Cooldown [EUW]
Well. If you use the FA before getting AND using the Herald trinket. Your FA will be fully refreshed as you "got it back". Its not like you bought it again from the shop right? So it makes no sense for it to be on cooldown when you get it back. Its like this: Your old FA was on cooldown and it was scrapped for a new FA that was not on cooldown. Makes sense for you?
Doctor Kat (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hailey Hayato,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MgeKljdN,comment-id=000900030000000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-10T11:20:54.037+0000) > > Call me Technicality Man. I am technically a normal man. > > I do realize that my comparison between the strategy and lethality was a bit far fetched but the same principal applies. If you get banned for a strategy that is unhealthy and unfun then you should be banned for everything that is unhealthy and unfun. Oh and, I know that Quinn is a tank Shredder(Teetant Matont Turtle guys) but I should not die THAT quickly to be honest. I expect to survive a bit longer than 8&#x27;ish seconds. > > So It wouldn&#x27;t matter who&#x27;s team got the Xerath.. Well, talk about the next to unbeatable strategy. > It was something I threw out there as something with what I thought had a bit of potential but I guess I was wrong. > > But in all seriousness. Riot should have seen this coming since they released Ascension in the first place. I mean there is a reason we have the PBE, and in my opinion this strategy would have been a perfect example to report to the PBE forums so it can be &quot;fixed&quot;. > > It feels like we are far too lenient with riot and their mistakes. 1, 2, 3 or 10 mistakes I can forgive but more than that and it becomes clear that something isn&#x27;t done to rectify the potential issues that can arise. I do try to keep an open mind and a neutral discussion as you and me, we are innocent and there is no reason for me for example to lash out at you because Riot didn&#x27;t overlook their creations with 100% accuracy. > > By the way, sorry for the change of topic but when was the last time we had O4A? With all the time that has passed you&#x27;d think Riot would have at least begun to port the mode over to the new client. Nothing more to add. Totally agree with you on all aspects!
Doctor Kat (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hailey Hayato,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MgeKljdN,comment-id=0009000300000000,timestamp=2017-08-10T09:04:24.043+0000) > > Technically speaking. You CAN counter the strategy. By you know, not taking out Xerath or taking the ascended buff. Had they known that it would be different. A &quot;Solution to COUNTER the situation&quot; as you put it. > > And Lethality was just an example. Oh and Riot reversed the bans because they got banned by a AUTOMATED system which was PUT IN PLACE against FEEDERS. They literally did NOT get banned for using the strategy. Riot agreed the strategy was unhealthy for the game and are planning to remove the ability to pull it off soon but Riot also agreed that you CANNOT get banned for using it. > > And in all honesty, had I been on the losing side. I would not have cared one bit since its ascension. Who gives a fu%k about ascension when you have modes like URF, that assassin only game mode or my favorite: O4A. > > And then you have the only mode which actually matters: Summoner&#x27;s rift 5v5 Draft(Both normal and ranked). Anyone with at least a shred of decency and dignity would not waste a single second getting mad over Ascension. > > On a final note. If armor counters lethality so good then perhaps you could explain to me why I died in less than 8 seconds as full tank Shen vs a full AD team in a 1v1 fight toplane against their lethality Quinn. > > Armor is as good of a counter to lethality as Magic resist is a counter to true damage. I can admit you can lower the damage done to you with more armor but not by much. I felt just as feeble early game when Quinn got Duskblade as i did lategame with thornmail, dead man&#x27;s plate and the other armor items including Ninja Tabi. *Technically speaking* people could know how to use wards properly and make decent teamcomps in any ello (not to mention decision making and champion mechanics). Also we could be living in a perfect world without food/water shortages in Somalia and India and where WW3 will never happen. But these scenarios are ideal and imaginary :D So I'm not pretty sure about the realism behind that idea to counter this ascension strategy, I understand it's posible... But come on, let's be real :D (btw, the team with the strategy could just take xerath for themselves anyway). You died vs that Quinn cause she's known as an AD tank shredder, your job is not to 1v1 her, but to tank for your teammates in order to let them kill her (cause obviously your jg/mid/adc would've killed her faster than she could kill you in a 1v1) . Would it had been an AP mage/assasin maybe the outcome would've been different. I truly appreciate your mindset regarding these gamemodes, I admire that, and I like the fact that you are one of those few people with that *shred of decency* (can't wait for O4A myself). :)
Call me Technicality Man. I am technically a normal man. I do realize that my comparison between the strategy and lethality was a bit far fetched but the same principal applies. If you get banned for a strategy that is unhealthy and unfun then you should be banned for everything that is unhealthy and unfun. Oh and, I know that Quinn is a tank Shredder(Teetant Matont Turtle guys) but I should not die THAT quickly to be honest. I expect to survive a bit longer than 8'ish seconds. So It wouldn't matter who's team got the Xerath.. Well, talk about the next to unbeatable strategy. It was something I threw out there as something with what I thought had a bit of potential but I guess I was wrong. But in all seriousness. Riot should have seen this coming since they released Ascension in the first place. I mean there is a reason we have the PBE, and in my opinion this strategy would have been a perfect example to report to the PBE forums so it can be "fixed". It feels like we are far too lenient with riot and their mistakes. 1, 2, 3 or 10 mistakes I can forgive but more than that and it becomes clear that something isn't done to rectify the potential issues that can arise. I do try to keep an open mind and a neutral discussion as you and me, we are innocent and there is no reason for me for example to lash out at you because Riot didn't overlook their creations with 100% accuracy. By the way, sorry for the change of topic but when was the last time we had O4A? With all the time that has passed you'd think Riot would have at least begun to port the mode over to the new client.
Doctor Kat (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hailey Hayato,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MgeKljdN,comment-id=00090003,timestamp=2017-08-10T08:20:32.888+0000) > > By your logic. Anyone who ruins the match experience for the enemy team should be punished. &quot;Oh hey we noticed out new stat lethality isn&#x27;t good enough so we buff it&quot;. > > -Proceed to get 1HK from every assassin ever. > match is now ruined for me because the enemy team runs full lethality. Because he is having fun at my expense he should therefore be punished. > > That&#x27;s your logic right there in another scenario. So going by your &quot;logical thinking&quot;, over half the playerbase would be permabanned already for... You guessed it. Making every match a living hell for at least one person. > > They found a strat that worked and was within the limitations of the game. Its the enemy team&#x27;s fault for surrendering. Oh and by the way. They were not banned for using this particular strategy. These situations are not the same thing and I'll tell you why. The lethality patch being broken was annoying, I agree, BUT - do you know what counteres lethality? ARMOR, and not feeding, and playing the game God damn smart in order to prevent that a&&hole rengar/talon etc. from GETTING to that point of just one shooting you. You are shifting the topic of this conversation to an unfair zone because you are taking it to the point where actual game knowledge, map awareness and general gameplay skill MATTER. So it's up to you to stop picking veigar into talon or rengar and then bringing this situation up to me as a comparison, because YOU HAVE solutions to COUNTER this situation if you think of it logically. But let's see how you counter this particular strategy at hand, in ascension - you guessed it: with head pills and painkillers :) The reason this game is ruined to an unfair level (and not cause you counterpicked yourself against a zed, or you didn't pay attention to kha walking over a ward and ganking you) is because it's uncounterable and time consuming to an absurd level. And yes, riot reverted the bans because of many, many people like you who started crying about the *immorality of those bans, because of a gameplay style YOU permitted*, but also, as I said, were you in the *victim team* -> you would've raged out for bans :) Riot decided to unban AND find a solution to change ascension to a point where this situation will not occur anymore. Peace out!
Technically speaking. You CAN counter the strategy. By you know, not taking out Xerath or taking the ascended buff. Had they known that it would be different. A "Solution to COUNTER the situation" as you put it. And Lethality was just an example. Oh and Riot reversed the bans because they got banned by a AUTOMATED system which was PUT IN PLACE against FEEDERS. They literally did NOT get banned for using the strategy. Riot agreed the strategy was unhealthy for the game and are planning to remove the ability to pull it off soon but Riot also agreed that you CANNOT get banned for using it. And in all honesty, had I been on the losing side. I would not have cared one bit since its ascension. Who gives a fu%k about ascension when you have modes like URF, that assassin only game mode or my favorite: O4A. And then you have the only mode which actually matters: Summoner's rift 5v5 Draft(Both normal and ranked). Anyone with at least a shred of decency and dignity would not waste a single second getting mad over Ascension. On a final note. If armor counters lethality so good then perhaps you could explain to me why I died in less than 8 seconds as full tank Shen vs a full AD team in a 1v1 fight toplane against their lethality Quinn. Armor is as good of a counter to lethality as Magic resist is a counter to true damage. I can admit you can lower the damage done to you with more armor but not by much. I felt just as feeble early game when Quinn got Duskblade as i did lategame with thornmail, dead man's plate and the other armor items including Ninja Tabi.
DELDE115 (EUW)
: These players deserved it. Sure its a very smart strategy, but you arent playing the game mode. Ascension is suppose to be all out war, pure 5v5 arena style pvp. ___ Those 5 players queued up with the intention to troll. And one was stupid enough to threat "its not the first, and it wont be the last". Is the 14 day ban extreme? Yes. Is it justified? Yes. These smart@sses came up with a way to win a game by ruinning the opposing team´s experience. By wasting their time. And the trolling team have no intention to kill the victim team either. They were just there to stand and waste time, and for what? sh*ts and giggles? Sure its "fun", but when a bullsh*t of a strat gets created, you all know for goddamn sure that everyone will start doing it, eventually spreading this bs strat around the world and destroying the spirit of the gamemode. ___ These guys got banned for not following the gamemode´s rules. The ban is extreme, but if it prevents people for making BS strats in order to "break" the games formula, then its completely justified. That premade team queue up with the intention to ruin games, and like the dummy who typed in the threat said, "it wont be the last". Meaning that those jerks were on a mission to make Ascension a living hell, which is against Terms or Service. ___ Moral of the story? Play the game, show sportsmanship, dont be a jack@ss. ___ Down vote all you guys want, but if that "virus" of a strat got popular, no one would play ascension. And the brave people that would, well, they would get trapped for 50 minutes. ___ The ban is extreme, but it serves as a warning, not only to them, but ALL of the LoL community. and that warning is "Play the game how its meant to be played", also "Dont mess with the system". Even if its a game mechanic.
By your logic. Anyone who ruins the match experience for the enemy team should be punished. "Oh hey we noticed out new stat lethality isn't good enough so we buff it". -Proceed to get 1HK from every assassin ever. match is now ruined for me because the enemy team runs full lethality. Because he is having fun at my expense he should therefore be punished. That's your logic right there in another scenario. So going by your "logical thinking", over half the playerbase would be permabanned already for... You guessed it. Making every match a living hell for at least one person. They found a strat that worked and was within the limitations of the game. Its the enemy team's fault for surrendering. Oh and by the way. They were not banned for using this particular strategy.
: The skin selection menu will now pop up as soon as you've locked your champion.
Scrinnid (EUNE)
: "Have fun, but not at others expense" Summoners Code. Thats the part they violated, hence the ban
Technically speaking. If I'm playing a game of league. Just a normal Summoner's Rift 5v5 and the enemy team wins. They had fun in getting the win while I become sad'ish because i lost. Therefore the enemy team had fun at my expense, shouldn't the enemy team be punished then for breaking the summoner's code? I can admit that "holding the enemy team hostage" like in the video is a sh/tty thing to do Yes but Riot did not tell us "how to play" this particular game mode. They never once said "You cannot do X thing" whereas X is specific strategy. This isn't an exploit, this isn't a bug. Its Riot's sh*tty @$$ Game design and you know it. If they didn't want us to use this particular strategy to win the game then they should have told us. We should not have to find out things like this for ourselves. They should have told us from the start instead of being the shady company that they are. The players found a strategy that worked. A shady one yes but a working one nonetheless. The fault lies within Riot games and their inability to play-test the sh*t they throw out to the public. And that's common knowledge too! Riot Games™ flat out REFUSE to test their broken sh*t before releasing it and then putting every bit of the blame on the players when they are just as much in the wrong. And don't tell me that they were honestly banned for having fun at other's expense. If you do then you have serious mental issues. There are a TON of things in league that are anti-fun that flat out ruins the game for most people. For me, I absolutely despise combat stealth and how there are next to no counters. Or how certain champions can build tanky and outdamage someone who builds full damage(not taking "return damage back to attacker" items and buffs into account). If they were banned for having fun at other's expense then certainly more than half the players in league would already be banned for breaking that Summoner's code rule.
Elionika (EUW)
: People with hearing impaired
Last hitting and watching the minimap is more visuals than sounds. If you aren't looking at the minimap because you can't hear it then the problem is you not looking at it. You should periodically sweep a glance at the minimap. Like every 5-10 seconds. Last hitting also has nothing to do with sounds. You can see when a minion die. SEE it die. And if you have the "gold" option enabled you will see how much gold you earned for whatever it was that you killed. Hell, when my first headset broke I was without sound for a solid two weeks and I didn't complain about it. I just upped my reaction time instead. I can understand where you are coming from as a person who has issues hearing but all the 3 points you just mentioned has little to nothing to do with ACTUAL sounds. Aside from maybe the pings and even that is also part VISUALS.
Enjutsu (EUNE)
: That's impossible, patches come out globally. Sure some specific experimental stuff gets released only on some specific servers, but urf isnt one of those. Im guessing your source for that is NA youtubers, but they probably forgot to mention that theyr footage is from PBE or at least expected you to notice it yourself. Like a week ago URF PBE cycle began too.
Yeah, that's what I meant. That it was released on PBE. I forgot to add that in my first comment above yours. A mistake on my part. I was in a rush. So sorry.
Smerk (EUW)
: Fun is highly subjective term. Fun for you doesn't equal fun for everybody. But let's not go into this any deeper. About that modes you want. > black market Not coming back, Riot said that this mode is overloaded, most likely they will divide it in two separate modes in the future: one with different minions and other with more items > the one where you chose enemy champions most likely won't come back, it was highly unpopular mode back when it was released > all for one not sure about this one, it appeared quite a few times before, as far as I'm aware they didn't bring it back for new client yet > urf will be there with next patch. This mode is very controversial, Riot decided to release it few times maximum per year Also we get same two modes that often because they are popular, basically safe choices for Riot when they aren't ready to give us something new
Actually, URF has already been released. In NA. Like a week ago.
: League of Legends on a PS4 Controller
Well, you need a way for the controller to emulate a keyboard and mouse. When I was forced to use a controller I used Xpadder software to do it. There are more software to do the same thing. I think motionjoy was another? The thing is that League of legends also uses a separate window. So it may not work in-game but it probably will work in the outside client.
: Champions Levels
Try contacting the player support https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us and see if they can remove it.
: Account Ban for no reason????
If you were permanently suspended then: 1) You most likely deserve it for breaking the rules. 2) You get an email to your email adress(duh. Like where else would it go? To your mailbox hahah x'D) that tells you the reason why you were banned. If you want to know what I personally think. I think you aren't telling us everything. Selectively not telling us the whole truth but parts of it.
Show more

Hailey Hayato

Level 30 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion