Beasty2K (EUW)
: Elo Hell - Bronze
Happy, sparkly attitude = WIN! Sleepy mood, nervousness, tilting, griefing, being anxious, scared, stoned = LOSE! Now you have a clear decision to make. It is up to you. Feel like you can't control your negative emotions regardless of players? Don't play Ranked. Go do something else. The attitude is the main thing here. Being happy will drag and attract more people that are actually good players in your team. I know it sounds like bull crap, but law of attraction is somewhat true.
: It's like the enemy excpects me to know with 100% accuracy that someone dc'ed and show them mercy. But I can guarentee you, the moment I DC they'd kill me and they'd simply say "/all outplayed".
Or just write "ez".. Hypocrisy as its highest i tell you!
Rioter Comments
Wen294 (EUW)
: Russia should've won last year tbh. They weren't my favorite ones, but quality-wise they were the best. Ukraine only won because of the political situation surrounding ukraine and russia. It's so stupid how they can never leave politics out of the eurovision song contest. I haven't listened to anything of this year. I usually don't do so in advance. Instead the whole family and some extras just sit in front of the screen watching it while ridiculing 50% of the performances, and it's more enjoyable to do so when you don't know any of the songs yet. That way you can really share the 'wooow what's this supposed to be' experience.
Excuse me, but Australia had the same or even more effort put into the performance, and the vocals were much, much better than Russia's. Honestly. I will not negotiate whether Ukraine or Russia should have won or not, but i will say for a fact that the Russian song was an absolute mediocre garbage in my opinion. His vocals also didn't shine as the Australian ones did. Just saying. As for the Ukraine, i don't think that the Ukraine won because of politics.. I mean, judges gave their marks including the public voting. I will say that i listen to the Ukrainian song still to this day, because of the emotion that was executed through vocals. Sure, not my cup of tea when it comes to my jam, but i feel like the emotion in that one overpowered both Russia and Australia. Which is surely something that not all of us can agree on, but i think the song won justifiably. Talking about politics, Sweden's song back in 2015 when each and every country had a GREAT song won regardless of whether some other songs were better or not. I guess the visuals influenced quite a lot. Therefore, the winners song doesn't have to be "the best", it just has to have some element(s) that influenced the victory overall. 2015 - handsome guy with cool visuals, 2016 - emotion and visuals, maybe dress. The only thing i have against Eurovision is how both Sweden and Italy are enormously overrated regardless (again) of the song.
Juhani (EUW)
: That contest is just stupid.. It's not about singing, and neighbour countries just voting for eachothers every year no matter how shit the performance was
Actually, the voting system has changed recently, and the neighboring voting reduced drastically.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Shiwah (EUW)
: Or maybe no one _could_ provide an answer because they had no idea of what was going on -- ever considered this possibility? To OP: glad it's solved, could you perhaps share if you got 80 euros worth of RP or if the payment didn't go through and you didn't get your money subtracted? It could help somebody else having the same problem in the future.
> [{quoted}](name=Shiwah,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=MfvsOiwO,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2017-03-19T10:25:26.694+0000) > > Or maybe no one _could_ provide an answer because they had no idea of what was going on -- ever considered this possibility? > > To OP: glad it's solved, could you perhaps share if you got 80 euros worth of RP or if the payment didn't go through and you didn't get your money subtracted? It could help somebody else having the same problem in the future. This community is big enough. Big enough to find at least one person at a time that could potentially help and give a proper answer to the asked question. When it comes to Payments, especially errors that occur, i find this to be extremely important. Even if a person doesn't know the proper answer, at least redirecting his question to the adequate section could be of use. Because when it comes to this, the person who is a victim of an error probably creates some kind of panic and helplessness, so at least knowing that he isn't alone is worth it. The OP's response to my question was absolutely correct. Players do like reading and clicking on various threads about complaining, uninstalling and being permanently banned. Especially if the thread is of an offensive nature, players love getting the joy for being "right" and just continuously spreading the negativity. **Oh, by the way, regardless of your intention for writing that comment, i find it completely unnecessary and useless to just write me back in that abrasive manner. It's like, you are literally stepping on my shoe, trying to prove me something or what not. I did not ask for your opinion regarding my comment that is nothing but an expression of how i feel. No need to reason feelings, as they are not yours, nor did i ask for an "explanation" to an unknown question that you answered to. Thanks for understanding **
: From what I see here, the opinions are spread. Some people won't need to be encouraged, some people need to be encouraged in a roast-funny way, some people need to be encouraged in a nice way. Kinda hard to keep up with all the players' needs. :3 Maybe if they ever think of implementing a thing like you guys said, it can be placed at Settings. Something like: "Encouragement voices through the game: ⬜ No need for them, IMMA PRO {{champion:157}} ⬜ Sweet, sugar, candy-man {{champion:427}} ⬜ Roller-roaster {{champion:86}} " so you can check whatever thing you think it would fit your personality. :D {{summoner:31}}
I died on the Ivern's part.. Sweet, sugar, candy man.. Christina goddess Aguilera ;D
Hansiman (EUNE)
: > I also did some digging and found out that Discord supposedly changes your chat or something like that in the game (if i read it right). This person got banned using it : There's absolutely no verification that Discord got that player banned, it's just a claim they've made. Programs that provide overlay tools aren't bannable, since it doesn't actually interfere with the game itself. And considering Discord is one of the most popular communication tools for gamers right now, I highly doubt people would get banned from LoL for using it.
I've got no knowledge behind Discord, so that person might as well be lying about it.
: Perma Banned for usage of 3rd party programs when none have ever been used on my account
Have you used anything that could change skins, maps or anything like that before? This could be a possible reason for your ban. I also did some digging and found out that Discord supposedly changes your chat or something like that in the game (if i read it right). This person got banned using it : http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/help-support/QzEUXavy-friend-got-banned-because-of-discordchat-service
: HELP ME :D
You can't change it to Korean but rather to Japanese (the closest). I also don't think you can change it to Chinese, but i might be wrong.
Rioter Comments
: I am kinda, sorta freaking out please help!
Kinda sad no one even tried giving you a proper answer.. I mean..
: I didn't really say he was bad, but I appreciate that the tone of my post came across as quite harsh. The intention was to make it come across as 'Here's how you can do better' rather than 'git gud', though. Sorry to you, OP, if it was taken in a 'get better' way. :(
> [{quoted}](name=A Red Herring,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=E4thEvWM,comment-id=000700010001,timestamp=2017-03-18T23:36:38.503+0000) > > I didn't really say he was bad, but I appreciate that the tone of my post came across as quite harsh. > > The intention was to make it come across as 'Here's how you can do better' rather than 'git gud', though. Sorry to you, OP, if it was taken in a 'get better' way. :( Riot, i would appreciate if you could take into account my profile.. Do not count last 5 games, just tell me what you think of what i should be doing, you are very precise and you seem to touch the parts of the solution, rather than an explanation when writing. You gave a detailed answer and i would like to hear an advice from you, considering my profile and rank. I know it's time consuming, but just, and only just if you have those 5 minutes.. It would mean quite a lot! Thank you :)
Aezander (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=000100000000000000010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-17T01:05:56.126+0000) > > I really have no intention to further argue with an obnoxious person. Especially when they don't read what you even write. Once again, thank you for confirming that i wanted an easy way out. You keep on pinning what i confirmed was already true. It's not me that is running from it, it's you that is trying to make it look bad, or, who knows, maybe you think i am trying to "run" from the fact that i wanted an easier way? Either way, you declined the fact that it was logical. I quote you : " What I concluded was that what you did was not, in fact, the **most** logical thing to do.". You said it yourself. I found a faster way out. A way to find answer. And that is pretty logical, actually, the most logical thing out of the possible two. Thank you for embracing the ignorance. It truly separates us. Thank you for the compliment ... Now that you gave me the opportunity ... Let's take a trip around your topic, shall we? First of all ... You make a topic about the meaning of a word. In your case ... the word (or composite word, depending on how you write it down) *cardholder*. And **just** two answers later you write this : >[...]As for the "Card holder", i thought it meant the pin of a credit card, but then i used my common logic sense and typed the name on the card. Viola.[...] Which is the definition of creating a pointless topic. Now ... On the response to you by TTekkers you write : >[...] You get one when you hit the legal age[...] And then proceed to call him rude and such and rant about the cards being complicated and whatnot. Fact 1: Not in all countries "you get one when you hit the legal age" Fact 2: When you got into a bank to request a credit card, your presence, as the future card owner, is required. You get several papers where you need to put your signature on. On those papers the term *card holder* does appear, even if you skim through them. ((Cause you do know that you are required to read them before signing)) Ergo, TTekkers doubts were valid ***from his point of view***. Whereas you showed a bit of ignorance on the workings of card requisition outside your land and in general. And as for the cases of 'minors' using someone elses cards, while passing it a their own, I believe the word you were looking for was 'improbable'. And then comes our own string of conversation. I quote you your own text about finding it over the internet, telling you that this makes your whole topic *somewhat* pointless. (You even write "*it's pretty easy to find* (\*) in that phrase I quoted) And you write to me about intentions and : > Taking the intentions into consideration is what will give you the answer. Four hours of gaming, thread was posted right before the game started. In that moment, there is no time to look it up online. So, it's pretty logical and understandable to just ask the question here, play a game and see the answers. Intentions do matter. A lot. Coincidentally. The word in that post should not have been '*intentions*', but '*reasons*', because that is what you present afterwards. When I tell you that your action is not the most logical thing to do, you almost fly into a fit. Yet you ignore one word, one adjective I used; '*most*' (I boldfaced it on your post where you quote me). You write as if I considered your solution completely irrational. Which was not the case. I simply presented you with far more logical solution compared to the one you presented, but that required more effort on your part. Then you decided to focus the conversation into whether or not finding the "easy way out", or wanting a "fast way", is a bad thing. Which again, I did not labeled it, but simply pointed out what you were describing was. I did not label it as bad or good. Though with your reaction it's not a long shot to consider it a '*bad thing*' in your case. Now. To get over with this. You said : > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=000100000000000000010000,timestamp=2017-03-13T18:00:16.497+0000) > > Taking the intentions into consideration is what will give you the answer. Four hours of gaming, thread was posted right before the game started. ***In that moment, there is no time to look it up online. So, it's pretty logical and understandable to just ask the question here, play a game and see the answers***. Intentions do matter. A lot. I ***boldfaced*** that particular part for one particular reason. Typing 'cardholder' or 'card holder' in google, gives you ***in the first page** a link to Wikipedia, and on the small excerpt those links usually have underneath, it writes ... > *Card holder or cardholder may refer to: A person who owns a card, such as a cardholder of a credit card A device which holds a card, such as a SIM card ...* And the whole thing took less time than the time you need to write a topic, even one as few-worded as yours. So actually, *it's pretty easy to find*(\*). And since you had time to write a post like yours between games, you had more than enough time to google it and get your answer asap. Now. Ask me again, if I am trying to make it look bad, or you are running from it.
> [{quoted}](name=Aezander,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=0001000000000000000100000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-17T15:29:34.102+0000) > > Thank you for the compliment ... Now that you gave me the opportunity ... Let's take a trip around your topic, shall we? It wasn't a compliment, though. Sorry. > > > Which is the definition of creating a pointless topic. Definition made by you. Therefore, it is not a definition but an opinion. > > Now ... On the response to you by TTekkers you write : Yaay, another devil's wanna be advocate, how exciting! > > And then proceed to call him rude and such and rant about the cards being complicated and whatnot. **Court..** Oh wait, it's not. > > Fact 1: Not in all countries "you get one when you hit the legal age" You mean, "Opinion 1" ? Facts don't become "facts" when you preach them out to be.. They become facts when it's proven by something or someone. Typically, scientifically or numbers of experiments etc.. The legal age of getting a debut card is 18. Check your so called "facts" before you decide to write something. > Fact 2: When you got into a bank to request a credit card, your presence, as the future card owner, is required. You get several papers where you need to put your signature on. On those papers the term *card holder* does appear, even if you skim through them. ((Cause you do know that you are required to read them before signing)) So, what you want to tell me is that on every single inch of a paper there is a space called "Card Holder" ? Sorry, but i don't live in UK.. Yet. Love it when your "facts" become nothing but a smelly wind. > > Ergo, TTekkers doubts were valid ***from his point of view***. Whereas you showed a bit of ignorance on the workings of card requisition outside your land and in general. And as for the cases of 'minors' using someone elses cards, while passing it a their own, I believe the word you were looking for was 'improbable'. Your beliefs are incorrect. Sorry. > > I quote you your own text about finding it over the internet, telling you that this makes your whole topic *somewhat* pointless. (You even write "*it's pretty easy to find* (\*) in that phrase I quoted) It's not pointless when taken the circumstances and the intentions into account. > > > Coincidentally. The word in that post should not have been '*intentions*', but '*reasons*', because that is what you present afterwards. There is a clear difference between the word "intentions" and "reasons". Intentions do matter. You do not get to tell me what i should have put in my sentence as, yet again, you don't get my intentions.. Open up a dictionary and maybe you will find the definition and why i used the word in the first place. > > When I tell you that your action is not the most logical thing to do, you almost fly into a fit. Yet you ignore one word, one adjective I used; '*most*' (I boldfaced it on your post where you quote me). You write as if I considered your solution completely irrational. Which was not the case. I simply presented you with far more logical solution compared to the one you presented, but that required more effort on your part. It is the most logical out of the two available. Objectively, it is not. Given the circumstances i was in, it is. > > Then you decided to focus the conversation into whether or not finding the "easy way out", or wanting a "fast way", is a bad thing. Which again, I did not labeled it, but simply pointed out what you were describing was. I did not label it as bad or good. Though with your reaction it's not a long shot to consider it a '*bad thing*' in your case. Now, since i can deduce that you are quite a "fighter" for logical sense, pointing out the obvious is not logical.. Unless you thought it wasn't being known and acknowledged. > > Now. > > To get over with this. > > You said : > > I ***boldfaced*** that particular part for one particular reason. Typing 'cardholder' or 'card holder' in google, gives you ***in the first page** a link to Wikipedia, and on the small excerpt those links usually have underneath, it writes ... Again, stating out the obvious.. Congratulations! > > And the whole thing took less time than the time you need to write a topic, even one as few-worded as yours. So actually, *it's pretty easy to find*(\*). Stating... out.. the.. obvious.. > > And since you had time to write a post like yours between games, you had more than enough time to google it and get your answer asap. Circumstances i was left in matter. You have no details of them given to you nor do you have any knowledge of them. Thus, you can only assume i had "more time", and it will only come out as an opinion. Nothing else. >
Aezander (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=0001000000000000000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-14T05:46:44.649+0000) > > As i said, it was the quickest way possible at the moment. I could have surely finish a game and look it up online.. But i did want answers ASAP. So i wrote the thread. Intentions matter. You can't quite say that it was not the "most logical thing to do", when in fact, it WAS. At the moment, it was. Why? I wanted the answer ASAP but i was in a game. I don't want to sound arrogant, but do i need crayons to draw it to you? I specifically explained the circumstances i was in, so that should do some explaining to you. No offense, honestly. Nope. You really don't need crayons to draw me the picture of you wanting the easy way out. Cause your description of the situation does paint it rather well. Should I try to outline it for you with a good ol'Faber Castel HB?
> [{quoted}](name=Aezander,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=00010000000000000001000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-14T11:13:04.242+0000) > > Nope. You really don't need crayons to draw me the picture of you wanting the easy way out. Cause your description of the situation does paint it rather well. Should I try to outline it for you with a good ol'Faber Castel HB? I really have no intention to further argue with an obnoxious person. Especially when they don't read what you even write. Once again, thank you for confirming that i wanted an easy way out. You keep on pinning what i confirmed was already true. It's not me that is running from it, it's you that is trying to make it look bad, or, who knows, maybe you think i am trying to "run" from the fact that i wanted an easier way? Either way, you declined the fact that it was logical. I quote you : " What I concluded was that what you did was not, in fact, the most logical thing to do.". You said it yourself. I found a faster way out. A way to find answer. And that is pretty logical, actually, the most logical thing out of the possible two. Thank you for embracing the ignorance. It truly separates us.
Aezander (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=00010000000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-13T20:48:40.668+0000) > > How is what i wrote not logical? It's absolutely logical. And yes, it IS faster. I didn't want to bother looking it up online. Thank you for acknowledging what i already wrote (?) . Quite ridiculous how you literally tried concluding that just because i wanted it the faster way it's a "bad thing" ? Where is logic in this though.. ? I did not conclude that what you did was a *"bad thing"* ... What I concluded was that what you did was not, in fact, the most logical thing to do. There is a difference between considering sth the *easy way* and a *bad thing*; you chose the former, despite the ease which internet offers already. Is it bad? In the long run, if you keep seeking out the *easy way out* it might be. Atm, is just you taking the easy way out of an easy situation. It happens.
As i said, it was the quickest way possible at the moment. I could have surely finish a game and look it up online.. But i did want answers ASAP. So i wrote the thread. Intentions matter. You can't quite say that it was not the "most logical thing to do", when in fact, it WAS. At the moment, it was. Why? I wanted the answer ASAP but i was in a game. I don't want to sound arrogant, but do i need crayons to draw it to you? I specifically explained the circumstances i was in, so that should do some explaining to you. No offense, honestly.
Aezander (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=000100000000000000010000,timestamp=2017-03-13T18:00:16.497+0000) > > Taking the intentions into consideration is what will give you the answer. Four hours of gaming, thread was posted right before the game started. In that moment, there is no time to look it up online. So, it's pretty logical and understandable to just ask the question here, play a game and see the answers. Intentions do matter. A lot. Ehm ... No. It's pretty logical and understandable to wait until the game is over and look the answer yourself before considering posting a query into the forums. After all, you are heading into a game, ergo there is no immediate need for the answer. And google is your friend before the boards. What you describe here is you wanting fast, ready made and unencumbered answers, so that you don't have to bother with the effort of searching it yourself.
How is what i wrote not logical? It's absolutely logical. And yes, it IS faster. I didn't want to bother looking it up online. Thank you for acknowledging what i already wrote (?) . Quite ridiculous how you literally tried concluding that just because i wanted it the faster way it's a "bad thing" ? Where is logic in this though.. ?
: Holder = Owner in that case
Yeah, figured that out yesterday.. I wish i had gotten some useful comments such as yours yesterday instead of suspicious accusations.
: If is your credit card, then fill your name and surname to the "card holder" even when it isn't written on credit card. If you're using someone's credit card (only with holder's permission) the type his/her name and surname. Mine credit card doesn't have card holder and i typed and I hadn't any problem
Thank you for the answer! Appreciate it.
TTekkers (EUW)
: Look, I know I was wrong this time. You don't need to write paragraph after paragraph to illustrate your being all high and mighty looking down on us peasants from the moral high ground. Bullies throw stones from the top of a hill, nice people throw a rope.
> [{quoted}](name=TTekkers,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=00010000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-13T07:37:56.694+0000) > > Look, I know I was wrong this time. You don't need to write paragraph after paragraph to illustrate your being all high and mighty looking down on us peasants from the moral high ground. > > Bullies throw stones from the top of a hill, nice people throw a rope. And arrogant people usually have an abrasive attitude towards others. :)
Aezander (EUW)
: >[...] *i am sure they would have looked up online (it's pretty easy to find) and not write it here* [...] And here is why your topic is somewhat pointless. Apparently you asked before bothering to look *online* for info.
> [{quoted}](name=Aezander,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=umNvsOnq,comment-id=00010000000000000001,timestamp=2017-03-13T08:14:41.983+0000) > > And here is why your topic is somewhat pointless. Apparently you asked before bothering to look *online* for info. Taking the intentions into consideration is what will give you the answer. Four hours of gaming, thread was posted right before the game started. In that moment, there is no time to look it up online. So, it's pretty logical and understandable to just ask the question here, play a game and see the answers. Intentions do matter. A lot.
TTekkers (EUW)
: Yea, it was rude and insulting, and I'm not going to take it back because I'd rather be rude and insulting than enable someone to spend someone else's money. I was wrong this time, but given that a significant proportion of league players are quite young, and probably too young to own their own credit card, if a thread like this pops up again, there's a significant chance I'll be right. Could I have clocked that you post a fair amount and usually post reasonably sensibly? Yea, but I didn't - a bit like yourself with the cardholder thing. ___ Here's a mistake we've both made on this topic - we could have downvoted/reported and walked away. But we didn't, we both fanned the flames.
Because the majority of people and teenagers just manually "find" the credit card or use somebody else's. What a great source of logic. Not abnegating that there aren't such cases in the world, but they are so small, that it's almost close to impossible. If a person had somebody else's card, i am sure they would have looked up online (it's pretty easy to find) and not write it here. Just some sense of logic. Not to mention that what i was asking had nothing to do with anything near or close to your assumption. Card holder, as a blank space is something that i am sure cannot indicate or imply anything. There is a difference between asking how to "hack" or invalidate a credit card. I specifically asked for help, since i had no time to search it online, mainly because i play this game quite a lot. Your comment has a reason why it's written, but i am pretty sure you overreacted quite a lot, leaving your assumptions to hang from the tree. Regardless of whether your common sense is justifiable or not, you purely don't get to decide and assume things like that. It's not only rude and impolite to other people's eyes, but it's also an indicator for an indirect insult (getting indirectly accused for something). Although i can understand, the question was asked politely without any indicators. If you knew the answer, you should have just wrote it. Or, a neutral option, to just ignore my thread. Now you can say how it's your opinion and maybe you felt like you needed to clarify that you know the answer but don't want to share it, still it came out unnecessarily rude. I am sure that the simplest logic would be to just answer, since the question wasn't (as i said) suspicious and it didn't have anything to do with invalidating a credit card. (not to mention that Google still exists) So observing these logical statements, i am pretty sure that your manner of approach was just not rightful in terms of politeness and logic itself. Maybe you should have asked yourself why would i ask the question on Boards if i didn't have my own credit card before quickly jumping to assumption.
TTekkers (EUW)
: On one hand, I want to help. But on the other hand, if you don't know what the card holder is you probably don't own a credit card and are using someone else's details without their knowledge. Which is not something I want to help with.
Thank you for not being useful in any way possible. You truly contribute to this community. I have a Visa credit card. It is mine. The problem is, i have never bought anything in my entire life online. I am sorry to disappoint your abrasive attitude, but not all of us care about Banks and credit cards. You get one when you hit the legal age, but you don't really get to know how to use it. There are dozens of numbers on it and it can get confusing quite a lot. That is why Riot even put the question mark that consists of an explanation of what CV2 is. Would never, ever in my life found out if it weren't for them. As for the "Card holder", i thought it meant the pin of a credit card, but then i used my common logic sense and typed the name on the card. Viola. You know, it's quite insulting and offensive assuming that i don't "own a credit card". Even if it just an assumption with probability. It's still not polite, you are basically saying how the card owners like myself are uneducated enough and that you can't help them because of that. Maybe if it said "The Card Owner", i would have figured it out faster. Either way, you don't get private lessons in bank on how to use your credit card online. You are so rude.
Rioter Comments
: You still took a troll champion for the position u were left with. So no im not mistaken. You just do yourself what you blame others for doing.
First of all, it is not a troll champion. It is a champion. Second of all, i had no position. It was to the last second that i had realized i need to pick something. So, no. You are quite mistaken, as i said.
: http://matchhistory.eune.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/EUN1/1618523122/205886873?tab=overview&participant=9 Yeah - and u played kogmaw support ...
You are so mistaken. This was the game where Liss literally stole my lane from me and banned my champion. Quite irritating, is it not? With that being said, i had no intention of winning nor having a good game. Quite astonishing how your "facts" become a wind. ;) <3
: I would rather be in Silver - Low Gold than in this Division, enough for the Ranked system.. Like, come on!
And you know what, i am actually glad i went through quite a few divisions before hitting Platinum twice by now, so i am pretty adequate to speak about this.. It's not normal nor natural to find that most of these players belong in the lower divisions.. Maybe because higher divisions have smaller player base, but it's still confusing to me how the same Silver or Gold is much better than Platinum.
KerberosFi (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Y8Ei99jW,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-03-09T17:10:41.477+0000) > So, before the Ranked matchmaking is completely ruined, i just wish that players could realize that not trying the best you can is equal to more chance of losing. It&amp;#039;s always been like that, but in this season in particular, i am absolutely fascinated by how many players come in high elo&amp;#039;s not knowing how to last hit and doing the simplest and most &amp;quot;easy to find&amp;quot; mistakes.. Over.. And over again.. Ranked can't techically be ruined because system tries to keep proportions of each rank somewhat stable(bronze 30%,silver 40%,gold 20%,plat<10%,dia around 1-2%,master challenger <1%)meaning if best 10% of players can get their $h1t together we might end up in conclusion the server has cometitively really high level(kappa).Then again each player might end up finding their own way to climb meaning they don't neccessarily need to be able to cs. **BUT** if their cs levels are low it isn't neccessarly because they couldn't do it but are denied or punished harder than they were in their previous divsion. And then again from challengers perspective plat looks like Bronze looks to plats. Everything is relative,if you see platinum as $h1tshow climb out as you (me too) did get there possibly because it was such a place when we arrrived there. edit:what I myself would though propose is that Riot would make demoting from leagues to lower less shielded(as it is now,myself included,dropping from division V is pretty hard).
I would rather be in Silver - Low Gold than in this Division, enough for the Ranked system.. Like, come on!
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
RNG Remi (EUW)
: Dear Riot Games - A Heartful Letter - Please read me
Boring letter, the last paragraph was interesting though. I hope they can make an exception in your case. But you should know that they can't know if it's your birthday or not..
Rioter Comments
: [EUNE] Looking for Toplane/Support
and challenger last season
: Matchmaking in Silver feels like living in Silent Hill
I understand people's concerns about the game, and thus they are obviously trying to defend the game and "calm you down".. But the truth is, no matter how harsh it is, this game needs some changes in the matchmaking system.. Preferably as soon as possible. Will the changes happen any time soon? Absolutely not. Riot simply has their focus on other, less important things.. This game is the game that if you don't know how broken it is and how many things it has that need to be changed, it will drive you to the very depths of tilting..
Rioter Comments
: Looking for a supp to get plat
Hello! I am currently Platinum 4, maining Sona and Blitzcrank!
The Febos (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=MUkMRFJy,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2017-03-02T23:19:38.597+0000) > > Absolutely no. By that, i meant going anywhere i want and picking anything that i want while still doing my best. There's nothing wrong with that. As long as you try your best to win, you're golden
> [{quoted}](name=The Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=MUkMRFJy,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2017-03-03T14:18:16.216+0000) > > There&#x27;s nothing wrong with that. As long as you try your best to win, you&#x27;re golden Well, thank you for that. But i guess it's only the EUNE that screams like chickens ..
: Ha ha ha this is awesome. I am so glad I am not alone. S7 is rubbish. Too much to moan about but I've gone from G3 last season to S5 today. I play any role now even support. Pick any character and my pref build. But I do try and win. And I don't flame. So cannot be banned. I enjoy games much more this way. The sad part is other players suffer because I am not playing to my OPTIMAL role or champion. But this is RIOT Games fault this time because when you go 8/0 v say a Yasuo or Riven and your team just hard feeds and you lose elo its pointless. The problem is all down to RIOT 100%. The matchmaking has been altered this season its so obvious the balance disparity is huge. Rather than match similar elo to similar elo they'll make you up of say a some silvers and a gold vs a plat and all silvers maybe a bronze. In their head the elo numbers match but in reality it makes for an utterly unbalanced game. And the allowing of smurfs does not help at all. Basically elo is not about balance its about ensuring that 50% win rate for maximum player addiction. Its like cocaine for gaming. Play support mate. Try darius or even renekton. Pick another adc support. Pick taric top. Braun even. Pick heimer adc. Just play to win. In this season is all sheer randomness whether you win or lose. And utter BS. So play to win. But for fun. Like me. Just a shame other players end up suffering because of RIOT but like I say they like clown fiestas because it keeps children addicted. Their goal is ultimately greed for money not to balance this joke of a season.
Yup, absolutely agree with you. I started playing Blitzcrank on the top lane, and i was quite satisfied. No stress no nothing. I played the best i can but also had fun. And i won actually. I am tired of picking my main champion and doing the best i can (because i always tried to have perfect KDA, help and win my lane) just to see my bot lane getting absolutely blown off the world.
Mireline (EUW)
: Time is somewhat like gravity. You can't taste, hear or see it, you can feel gravity though, atleast i think you can, but you can't feel time. You can messure both, so saying time deos not exist is like saying gravity deosn't exist, while you would then be going on and proving to me that gravity deos exist with letting something fall to the ground, while i would then go on and prove to you that time exists with asking you if its still the same moment as when you wrote your first comment.
> [{quoted}](name=Mireline,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=V2azKU8Y,comment-id=001500000000,timestamp=2017-03-03T07:14:11.605+0000) > > Time is somewhat like gravity. You can&#x27;t taste, hear or see it, you can feel gravity though, atleast i think you can, but you can&#x27;t feel time. You can messure both, so saying time deos not exist is like saying gravity deosn&#x27;t exist, while you would then be going on and proving to me that gravity deos exist with letting something fall to the ground, while i would then go on and prove to you that time exists with asking you if its still the same moment as when you wrote your first comment. Quite a fail argument there. We have present definitions of time and gravity, so saying how "time" can't be felt, tasted or heard is quite preposterous. We have a definition of gravity, therefore, it's quite measurable. We also have a definition of "time", although it's just another theory and not a fact. If we go ahead and make a conclusion based off of the definition, time DOES NOT exist. If we say, for an example, that "time" might be something else.. Then it would probably have a different name. Was quite disappointed by your comparison. Think a little more.
Rioter Comments
: Time doesn't exist, clocks do. Past is not time, it's our memories. We made a "day", we made an "year" and we certainly made memories. Time travel, therefore, is absolutely not possible and will never be. Simply because time doesn't exist, unfortunately. There is only now. I do, however, think that after this universe ends, obviously the other one will come that could possibly change everything we know. You know, the physics and also the shape of the planets etc.. We don't know what else exists. I mean, what kind of imaginable physics rule.. It could be hundred of thousands.. But it;s not gonna be in this universe.
Oh, by the way, for anyone wondering, it has been scientifically proven that time actually doesn't exist. There are literally hundreds of articles on the internet confirming the stated.
Not Xpeke (EUW)
: I'd like to hear different thoughts on the idea of Time Travel.
Time doesn't exist, clocks do. Past is not time, it's our memories. We made a "day", we made an "year" and we certainly made memories. Time travel, therefore, is absolutely not possible and will never be. Simply because time doesn't exist, unfortunately. There is only now. I do, however, think that after this universe ends, obviously the other one will come that could possibly change everything we know. You know, the physics and also the shape of the planets etc.. We don't know what else exists. I mean, what kind of imaginable physics rule.. It could be hundred of thousands.. But it;s not gonna be in this universe.
The Febos (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=MUkMRFJy,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-03-02T22:36:41.750+0000) > > i will simply play what i want and go where i want in ranked. If by "not caring" you mean intentionally grief games, then you'll be punished. Good luck with that quest.
Absolutely no. By that, i meant going anywhere i want and picking anything that i want while still doing my best. I know that it probably sounds as it does, but lots of things happened to me today, and i was seriously getting anxious seeing how my top laner has a match history with a KDA of 0:10, literally, and she is in Platinum. This sounds like complaining, i get it. I get that not everyone gets bad luck in games and stuff.. But to be honest, i've made a peaceful pact with my mind. The word "tired" isn't even close to what i actually felt like. The only one who was trying to win the game in my games was me. I know that not everyone is good, or maybe just a bad day, but if you don't try the slightest, why expect to win? For some reason, i can't be the one concluding who is bad and who is good based on one game. But i absolutely can come to a conclusion that the majority doesn't even try to win. I bet they are probably all decent players, yet they simply don't try. For some quite unknown reason. I always try. I always did. And that is why usually no one flames me and stuff. Even when i get absolutely rekt by a jungler, i still try, and somehow i always come back in the end. Others give up way too easily.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Riot tmx (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=slFBEUB8,discussion-id=3814olhU,comment-id=001400000001,timestamp=2017-03-02T14:23:06.621+0000) > > They are still disabled.. Will anyone fix this please.. Kinda wastes my time considering the main problem is fixed.. Can you relog?
The ranked queues are enabled once i restarted the client, although the red circle still persists. The message is there.
Riot tmx (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lucifer Spirit,realm=EUNE,application-id=slFBEUB8,discussion-id=3814olhU,comment-id=0014,timestamp=2017-03-02T14:09:30.866+0000) > > Ranked queues are disabled.. Ranked queues were re-enabled 3 minutes ago.
They are still disabled.. Will anyone fix this please.. Kinda wastes my time considering the main problem is fixed..
Show more

Lucifer Spirit

Level 30 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion