VIT Laati (EUNE)
: You missed the point. It is better to ban the Zoe, than to risk it being picked by the enemy. Release Zoe, like release Irelia and Akali, should be banned if not first picked.
Pick or ban,that is diferend story,because game is not balanced. That have nothing to do with what im talking about.
Shamose (EUW)
: No. nothing would get banned if he didn't keep trying to play a champion he's gonna lose on.
How you know he is gona lose?
: Let me give you an example of a case why this suggestion will never go through. Let's say your mid is last pick and wanted to play zoe on her release. Your mid is the only one who owns zoe, he can't have much experience with her yet, your team doesn't have first pick and Zoe is overpowered. There are already so many reasons why letting his teammates ban zoe is a good thing and they should be encouraged to do so.
In this case,that player who wants to play zoe,he also play to win.He is gona play his hardest,because if he lose,he is gona lose lp like his teammates. Players should not forbid other players what they want to play.
Shamose (EUW)
: That's his own decision that could get him banned.
And in the end nothing of this player would not get banned if ally champ did not get banned
Shamose (EUW)
: You can however deicde what he's **not** gonna play.
You can,but you are just gona make that person go troll
: so if i see a last pick {{champion:157}} OTP with a 30% winrate, you're telling me i shouldn't ban {{champion:157}} ?
Definetly not. You cant decide what he is gona play
Rioter Comments


Level 120 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion