: > [{quoted}](name=vonov,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=WTPFdbrU,comment-id=00010002000000000000,timestamp=2018-05-20T15:31:16.513+0000) > > Hi ...my smart friend, > > Who is responsible for MMR? > Me? Yes, you are responsible for your own MMR. It's not arbitrarliy decided by the game developers.
Looking at your match history seems that you know what you say. I will continue to play, this time I have an old strategy; I will play after midnight. This way I will escape some of the kids.(since mine will go to school in the morning, I presume other parents will put their kids to sleep before 00:00) GLHF
: > [{quoted}](name=vonov,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=WTPFdbrU,comment-id=000100020000,timestamp=2018-05-20T14:24:05.251+0000) > > Hi ISNEEZ (bless you :) ) > I can't disagree with Paulimus, but trust me that what he says, does not apply to me. And why does what he say not apply to you? He litterally only said things that are true, not just specifically for you (and I doubt you are an exception to those rules) > ...and yes, "the system" is the problem. :) > When you, as a game developer, see the stats of a bunch of players that somehow are bad at the game, you must not trow them in games with the other bunch of players that are performing well. Everyone has bad games. The 'system' that is so flawed in your opinion doesn't know what stats someone will have in a game. He 'throws' players together that have similar MMR (which is based off consistency and thus has the highest chance of being accurate and making fair matches), and obviously sometimes players play worse and others play better, but that will be the case in every single team based game. If people are good at the game, they will climb, if people aren't good enough to climb, they will stay at their elo. > Imagine me putting you in a race against Usain Bolt, Justin Gatlin, etc. ...what are your chances? But the system doesn't place you against those people. You have silver mmr, you get mached against people with silver mmr. Usain bolt and justin gatlin wouldn't be silver players in racing, and thus wouldn't be matched against you. That's the entire point of MMR
Hi ...my smart friend, Who is responsible for MMR? Me?
: toxic ppl will get their ban 100% ;) riot is very strictly banning those and death wishes get insta(maybe a few days later) 14 Day ban and after that a permanent one... so just report them (u dont need enemys to report them too 1 Report matters to trigger the bot that scans for bad behaviour) and if one is really hard raging like get cancer etc. u could also send it to riot and he will check his history if its filled with toxicness the riot boy will likely perma him right away
Hi GGOD, I play the game for fun, not for reports. I remember when I was playing against AI that players there were also reporting for KS and/or funny stuff like that. Players do not understand the word TEAM. They want only a perfect KDA ratio. No one will give a damn about the other 4 player stats. GLHF
iSneez (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=vonov,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=WTPFdbrU,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-05-20T07:54:02.627+0000) > Question: am i the only one getting bad teammates? > Question2: If my ranked trend is upward, why do I gen team players from the bottom of the tier?(me silver3, the rest of 4 are below bronze2) > Question3: why the enemy team gets(always) 2 gold, 1 plat, 1 smurf(booster) and 1 silver? > > Hi, I am 36yol :) q1- I can't play anymore without muting all, I use for couple of months "/fullmute all" in 95% of the games which mute chat and especially pings because for me pings are more toxic and annoying then chat. q2 - from my experience while you progress and win like a big winning streak, you get stronger enemies, but your teammates stay same, and they look bad and noobs comapre to the strong enemy, but if you played with them before the win streak vs a lower enemy then they seems good players, just the enemy being better make them to feel bad players. It's just a perception. q3- gold. plat,silver doesn't matter or impact the matchmaking system, just the mmr dose so a plat 5 can have gold 3 mmr and gold 2 can have plat 5 mmr, also a silver 1 can have gold 3 mmr. The problem is that a silver 1 with gold 3 mmr (after a huge winning streak) if he never played in platinum before and he is just a good but inexperienced player he will never have same game knowledge as a platinum 5 with gold 3 mmr (after a huge losing streak), so they are in same team or face each other as enemy both having gold 3 mmr but the platinum 5 with his experience and game understanding will almost always desoty the silver 1 with gold 3 mmr but inexperienced. Even if he don't win the lane against him he will bring more to the team with his experience then the inexperienced skilled player. But the system cannot place people on their experience and game knowledge but by their mmr so this can't never be fix and it's same in every game not only in league. MMR system try to match you with similar skilled players base on multitude of factors, so you have a fair game, but it's not perfect and wil never be perfect because the system try to place you with similar skill players but it's hard just base on statistics to be accurate. Since we are humans not machines with good or bad days or periods, it's impossible for a machine using mathematics and statistics to compare humans so it just make a rough approximation but never perfect.
Hi again :) So there are 2 problems ... me and MMR :) Problem solved. I just need to find solutions. GLHF
iSneez (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Paulimus,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=WTPFdbrU,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-05-20T08:19:45.985+0000) > > To people that complain about always having bad teammates I always say this: > Every player that goes into queue is a potential "bad player" that is going to feed. So the enemy team has 5 players that could potentially be that player. Your team on the other hand only has 4 players that could be the "bad player", because you (allegedly) are such a good player that you never feed, you are the constant. So, eventually, since the chance of your team losing because of a feeder is lower than that of the enemies, you should climb. Of course only if you're that good of a player like you say that is. Man, I want to congratulate you, this is the most smart and logic answer I see as a response to people that think its their team fault or the system. I always tied to explain it myself in many replies but I never find the right words, this is just perfect. I will copy/paste it and use it for now but give you credits :) Funny is as majority of this community can't handle logic, and see logic as flame becuase it hurt their brain so it must be toxic, you already got a downvote :D, while no logic person can't argue with this they prefer to downvote from the shadows.
Hi ISNEEZ (bless you :) ) I can't disagree with Paulimus, but trust me that what he says, does not apply to me. ...and yes, "the system" is the problem. :) When you, as a game developer, see the stats of a bunch of players that somehow are bad at the game, you must not trow them in games with the other bunch of players that are performing well. Imagine me putting you in a race against Usain Bolt, Justin Gatlin, etc. ...what are your chances? That is my logic. Write/wrong, only time will give me the answer. GLHF
: Answer 1: Yes you're the only one in this game getting bad teammates, and the whole world is against you and tries to stop you from getting challenger. Of course. Answer 2: That is because of your MMR, you can google it if youre interested. Answer 3: From what I myself am seeing in your match-history you only play against low silver-players. Maybe elaborate on that? To people that complain about always having bad teammates I always say this: Every player that goes into queue is a potential "bad player" that is going to feed. So the enemy team has 5 players that could potentially be that player. Your team on the other hand only has 4 players that could be the "bad player", because you (allegedly) are such a good player that you never feed, you are the constant. So, eventually, since the chance of your team losing because of a feeder is lower than that of the enemies, you should climb. Of course only if you're that good of a player like you say that is.
Hi, I never said that I am good at LoL, for sure I am above average. Opposite team have(once in 3-5 games) a feeder...but not like 3/15, more like 7/9. I'm not crying for mercy, faith or...whatever. I had to(again) release "the pressure" in my head by writing here. A1: if I am the only one...then I will accept the fact that i am bad at the game(I don't play for challenger, read please that I stated "play for fun". A2: I would say that MMR is fine(or I don't understand what you say) A3: I've done a little search before, those "low silver-players" ...well...are they silver players or I can't read their ranks.(trust me i know a low silver-player goes around..according to you, I am a low silver-player) I usually play Top and I do my best to be at least constant in the game, I run with team, I try not to feed...rarely inting. The issue is that a game can't be won by a constant player. The issue is that my other team mates don't understand the basic principle of the word "team". Since they don't understand the word, they can't apply the principle. Example is my last game where the ADC managed to get in line with my logic and i did my best to be his front line. I will take a brake and try again in 1 week, maybe i am the problem :). Thank you for you time and thoughts!
Rioter Comments

vonov

Level 67 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion