BuppleBg (EUNE)
: Complaining about AFK's
Riot is just too incompetent to see the problem here. So many people have stressed it out, but "because there can always be technical difficulties or real life emergencies", they won't do shit about it. As if there weren't a NUMBER of solutions around that. But frankly I gave up on my hopes of Riot getting to their senses.
DunderMn (EUW)
: IDEA FOR RIOT: Dealing with afk players in ranked games
As if Riot would care about AFK players. Good joke.
: Delete Conqueror already
Tanks should be...well, tanky, and apply a lot of peel (CC etc.). They should _not_ deal tons of damage. I mean, I did not analyze it in detail yet, but since Conqueror exists, all trades are suddenly x10 harder.
: Delete Conqueror already
I see why Riot had to act on tanks being too strong vs other top lane classes. But they did it in the most unclever way possible. Why not just nerf tank damage instead of denying their only purpose, which is tankiness? Wtf? Riot made so many questionable decisions in S8, it's horrible.
Rioter Comments
: Sona melody change
With Sona, it's often more effective to use her empowered auto-attacks for poke and extra heal on allied champions. You can even heal allied players over walls by W -> Right click, if they are in AA range. Also, slows can be applied to enemies with E -> Right click. And take Kleptomancy. Ir's procced by every empowered AA.
: Ahri, Assassin or Fighter?
I go Dominion: Eletrocute / Cheap Trick / Argus' Legacy / Ravenous Hunter Sorcery: Mana Flow / Gathering Storm Electrocute lets you trade early very nicely, and Gathering Storm boosts your scaling a lot. Mana Flow for sustain etc.
: The reason people don't like support
Simply not true. I am playing both support and ADC, and sadly, supports are far more often clueless than ADCs.
Pyrosen (EUW)
: Name a champion that's actually >fun< to play
{{champion:17}} Teemo. Enemies always get super tilted when you wreck them, ideally with a lot of shrooms. So satisfying.
Shawue (EUNE)
: I dare u play Yasou and have a good score with him.
> [{quoted}](name=Shawue,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=IRsgZn7y,comment-id=0000000000010001,timestamp=2018-01-03T19:24:13.757+0000) > > I dare u play Yasou and have a good score with him. I thought about it already, but I feel so dirty just considering to buy him. I just can't...bear him. Ugh.
Fajerk (EUW)
: You do realise it's preseason and there are people who really do not care atm. It's going to be reset in few weeks after all.
> [{quoted}](name=Fajerk,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Z5eB96ti,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-01-02T04:43:37.569+0000) > > You do realise it&#x27;s preseason and there are people who really do not care atm. It&#x27;s going to be reset in few weeks after all. Either it's the end of the season, or pre-season, or <insert excuse here>. Literally the game is in a bad state for months from November to January, and this is far too long to just sit it out. I myself decided not to play ranked games. Like ever. Rank (especially in low elo) is not a display of skill, but a matter of who gets the decent team. And since the outcome of the match is really important, you get super tilted if people are just asses. So no, for a game that should just be entertaining and fun, that's not fitting.
Shawue (EUNE)
: Why wont people stop with this meme bro its very old now and have no sense hes a champ that actually requiers skill and its hard to win with him in higher ranks .
> [{quoted}](name=Shawue,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=IRsgZn7y,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-01-02T21:20:13.387+0000) > > hes a champ that actually requiers skill and its hard to win with him in higher ranks . Hire this guy, he's funny.
Luvalon (EUW)
: How is Cho'Gath balanced?
There is counterplay to Cho - dodge his Q. Champs like Riven have the mobility at hand to do this, then CC him and deal enough damage to always outtrade before shield-dash away.
: Autofill and secondary role should be removed
League is a game consisting of five roles. Learn all of them at least to the extent that you are not a hard-feeder. If you don't, you are simply not good at the game. If you played your favorite shooter, and got a shotgun instead of your favorite sniper rifle, would you complain as well? I think not. Truth hurts.
Potchikir (EUW)
: Champions that counter {{champion:157}} On MidLane {{champion:10}} {{champion:30}} {{champion:82}} {{champion:1}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:8}} {{champion:34}} {{champion:112}} {{champion:245}} {{champion:91}} {{champion:126}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:38}} {{champion:163}} {{champion:42}} {{champion:142}} {{champion:26}} {{champion:90}} {{champion:41}} {{champion:3}} {{champion:268}} {{champion:25}} {{champion:238}} {{champion:55}} {{champion:103}} {{champion:84}} On TopLane {{champion:74}} {{champion:57}} {{champion:86}} {{champion:10}} {{champion:59}} {{champion:92}} {{champion:164}} {{champion:39}} {{champion:58}} {{champion:80}} {{champion:122}} {{champion:36}} {{champion:27}} {{champion:54}} {{champion:75}} {{champion:91}} {{champion:50}} {{champion:1}} {{champion:24}} {{champion:41}} {{champion:78}} {{champion:8}} {{champion:62}} {{champion:126}} {{champion:223}} {{champion:2}}
> [{quoted}](name=Potchikir,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=68kEJAr0,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-01-01T13:33:36.043+0000) > > Champions that counter {{champion:157}} > > On MidLane > {{champion:10}} {{champion:30}} {{champion:82}} {{champion:1}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:8}} {{champion:34}} {{champion:112}} {{champion:245}} {{champion:91}} {{champion:126}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:38}} {{champion:163}} {{champion:42}} {{champion:142}} {{champion:26}} {{champion:90}} {{champion:41}} {{champion:3}} {{champion:268}} {{champion:25}} {{champion:238}} {{champion:55}} {{champion:103}} {{champion:84}} > > On TopLane > {{champion:74}} {{champion:57}} {{champion:86}} {{champion:10}} {{champion:59}} {{champion:92}} {{champion:164}} {{champion:39}} {{champion:58}} {{champion:80}} {{champion:122}} {{champion:36}} {{champion:27}} {{champion:54}} {{champion:75}} {{champion:91}} {{champion:50}} {{champion:1}} {{champion:24}} {{champion:41}} {{champion:78}} {{champion:8}} {{champion:62}} {{champion:126}} {{champion:223}} {{champion:2}} With two third of these champions picked, Yasuo would kick your ass. Especially projectile-reliant champs are just bad vs Yasuo, because he has so many no-brain mistake-forgiving mechanics (passive shield, windwall). I say the following with no exaggeration or toxicity, but just as my humble opinion: Delete Yasuo. This champion design is so bad, it's like a 12-year old made it. ("I want an Asian super fighter! He should have a powerful shield! And he can shoot wind storms! And he has an inpenetrable windwall! And he does incredible damage for free! Also, he's super fast!") I don't say, Yasuo is not beatable, but you have to put triple effort to it, though your opponent does not even need to use their brain.
: How not to get an S- S S+
In the current snowbally teamfight 20 min gg meta, it's incredibly hard to get an S. You just don't properly farm anymore, and frankly, you don't _need _to anymore. Why should I farm up if I can get 15 kills in 20 mins with a crappy CS score?
: dammit
qko pate (EUNE)
: Something that will happen if Riot make a ban system for a bad players
As people said, everyone can have bad games. Hell, EVERYONE has horrible KDAs when they are new to League. You need like 1-2 months to not be an UNintentional feeder, because this game has no decent learning / tutorial technique whatsoever. The only thing I wish for that if players feed hard enough, they are not allowed to participate in the surrender vote for that particular game. It really, really infuriates me if someone ruins the game by going 1-12, then blocks the surrender vote because he "has still fun", or "we can still win".
ˉˉIˉˉ (EUW)
: You can never guarantee to stay during a game. Why wouldn't the <5% thing I mentioned work for you ?
> [{quoted}](name=sei556,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=AdAsnj6G,comment-id=000400000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-12-31T00:15:09.104+0000) > > You can never guarantee to stay during a game. > > Why wouldn&#x27;t the &lt;5% thing I mentioned work for you ? In my opinion, that is just still too much. But of course you can debate over this. I play since over a year and I needed to leave the game twice (once due to technical failure, the second time due to my cat having an emergency problem). None of the premades I played with during that year ever had even any AFK issues ever. So yeah, I assume a free strike once a month is rather gernerous. And even if you get a 24h ban for the second strike, it's not the end of the world.
ˉˉIˉˉ (EUW)
: > Can you explain why you believe your system is fair and the current system is not ? As I said, your "System" seems flawed and unfair. You should explain why it's fair and why the current one isn't. Why bound it to 1 month and not to a percentage of games in a given amount of time. Let's say you're allowed to leave <5% of games in 30 days but only counting for 20+ games (if you play less than 20 games in 30 days it will count as 20 games, duh). Therefore you would be able to leave 1 game every 20 games you play, which is basically nothing if you keep in mind that one game is arround 28 minutes. => Every 9,3h playtime you would be able to leave one game without being in fear of getting banned. Additionally I want you to explain why you want those strict rules. I encounter pretty much no leavers and I'm playing against and with all elos from bronze to plat (rarely diamond). It happens in like 1 of 20 games that someone is afk and in 2/3 of the cases it's not an intentional disconnect.
> [{quoted}](name=sei556,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=AdAsnj6G,comment-id=0004000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-12-30T23:10:39.557+0000) > > As I said, your &quot;System&quot; seems flawed and unfair. You should explain why it&#x27;s fair and why the current one isn&#x27;t. > Why bound it to 1 month and not to a percentage of games in a given amount of time. > Let&#x27;s say you&#x27;re allowed to leave &lt;5% of games in 30 days but only counting for 20+ games (if you play less than 20 games in 30 days it will count as 20 games, duh). > Therefore you would be able to leave 1 game every 20 games you play, which is basically nothing if you keep in mind that one game is arround 28 minutes. > > =&gt; Every 9,3h playtime you would be able to leave one game without being in fear of getting banned. > > Additionally I want you to explain why you want those strict rules. I encounter pretty much no leavers and I&#x27;m playing against and with all elos from bronze to plat (rarely diamond). It happens in like 1 of 20 games that someone is afk and in 2/3 of the cases it&#x27;s not an intentional disconnect. Well, I have leavers everyday. Like really. I kept track for it for a while (even made several forum posts about it). And as someone else already stated, if you can't guarantee to stay during the game, don't player multiplayer co-op games. Saying "I might dc, but the chance is small, and I so much want to play" is just really selfish. Go fix whatever causes your risk of disconnecting more often and then come back. Or play non-coop / single player games, where you are the only person who suffers from a disconnect.
ˉˉIˉˉ (EUW)
: A free disconnect a month ? Because those accidents can't happen more than once a month ? The current system analyzes how often and at which part of a game someone leaves which is pretty fair imo. Why change it and therefore ban many innocent players ? Doesn't really make sense to me.
> [{quoted}](name=sei556,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=AdAsnj6G,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2017-12-30T18:55:28.948+0000) > > A free disconnect a month ? Because those accidents can&#x27;t happen more than once a month ? > > The current system analyzes how often and at which part of a game someone leaves which is pretty fair imo. > > Why change it and therefore ban many innocent players ? Doesn&#x27;t really make sense to me. If it occurs twice a month, you get a 24h ban, which is quite acceptable in my eyes. And if it occurs even more often, you deserve a punishment. Don't play if you have no time, don't play if your connection is always bad.
ˉˉIˉˉ (EUW)
: No. There can be many reasons why someone might leave a game. That's why this system workes this way. Riot even explained it. Imagine you're playing a game and suddenly you have to leave your pc for any reason. Maybe you have to call an ambulance or anything like that. Maybe your connection randomly breaks because of your internet provider having a problem. Maybe your power turns off or your pc crashes because of some weird spaghettie code. Now you come back to your game, you did nothing wrong but you're now banned for one week. Does that sound fair to you ?
> [{quoted}](name=sei556,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=AdAsnj6G,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2017-12-30T18:35:50.550+0000) > > No. There can be many reasons why someone might leave a game. That&#x27;s why this system workes this way. Riot even explained it. > > Imagine you&#x27;re playing a game and suddenly you have to leave your pc for any reason. Maybe you have to call an ambulance or anything like that. Maybe your connection randomly breaks because of your internet provider having a problem. Maybe your power turns off or your pc crashes because of some weird spaghettie code. > > Now you come back to your game, you did nothing wrong but you&#x27;re now banned for one week. Does that sound fair to you ? Give players one free disconnect a month. Then start with 24h bans, and increase the duration if the bad behaviour stays.
: why those people wont get banned?
Sometimes you get the impression that Riot is just fine with AFK behaviour. Watch the forum threads. The people that got banned, what were they banned for? AFKing? Not a single one. Write down every AFK player you reported, and check if their still playing ~1 wekk or 2 later. You will see. that none of them gets banned either.
: Please start banning for leaving immediately
Riot just gives a shit about this topic. It's ridiculous.
elin990 (EUW)
: Long waiting time queues, lobby dodges, declined ready checks, remakes. In bronze.
I always wondered why there is such a high rate of people declining ready check. Do they start match seeking and then a) take an enormous dump b) ~~screw their girlfriend~~ make love to their partner c) have a seizure d) die of spontaneous combustion e) get abducted by aliens f) ? Never got it. It's not too annoying, though.
: RIOT STOP DOING THIS TO ME
Reported for notorious AFK behaviour. -1 anti-mate
: Make Ornn E Damage turrets! (With a non-interuptable but CC-able channel?)
Yes, because towers are definitely not falling quick enough in the game. :)
SeanGoku (EUW)
: If everyone reports the players that AFK, they get punished. It's up to the community to take part in the ruling. Too few people actively use the function. After every game the lobby is nearly empty in an instant. And that's the core problem. It's not Riots fault the players don't take the time to train the system.
> [{quoted}](name=SeanGoku,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=9F5wmqf3,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-12-27T02:14:39.771+0000) > > If everyone reports the players that AFK, they get punished. It&#x27;s up to the community to take part in the ruling. Too few people actively use the function. After every game the lobby is nearly empty in an instant. And that&#x27;s the core problem. It&#x27;s not Riots fault the players don&#x27;t take the time to train the system. Just that they are not punished although reported. I literally kept track of it, and none the players I reported were banned. Don't know about LPQ of course, but I do not consider that a punishment.
: I think you should be able to enjoy the game even when you're not winning. If he continues going afk in games he will get a low priority queue. (Also I agree with whoever told you to stop posting about that, because if everybody who had someone in their game who they blame for their loss posted about it, the boards would be full of such threads)
> [{quoted}](name=Áseryo,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=9F5wmqf3,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-12-26T21:01:23.558+0000) > > I think you should be able to enjoy the game even when you&#x27;re not winning. If he continues going afk in games he will get a low priority queue. > (Also I agree with whoever told you to stop posting about that, because if everybody who had someone in their game who they blame for their loss posted about it, the boards would be full of such threads) But that's the point. If there were more complaints, Riot would give that topic a higher priority. I WISHED people would mass complain about it. And: 1. LPQ is a pity excuse of a punishment. 2. I am fine with not winning. I am not fine with giving my best, fighting as hell and then lose because some anti-mate decided to leave because he's gone 2-4 in midlane. 3. This would still be bearable, if AFK players would not occur on a daily basis on one of the teams. I proved this a week ago with screenshots, until I was told to stop. And it's still an issue. In fact, today it was the third AFK player in seven games today. If Riot is not capable of punishing AFK, maybe they should just officially allow it, and not blockqueueing when the former match is still in progress. So I could just leave as well instead of having to waste my time. Okay, might be a silly idea too. But hell, I just don't know what to do about that topic anymore.
Rioter Comments
: Typical day in League (small rant)
Just tried it, but my bot game didn't count as FWotD. It also says so in the description, as i just noticed. :(
Rioter Comments
: Batman VS All Lol Champions (Not Lore)

Ayanami3rd

Level 108 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion