mistry (EUW)
: The problem you have, and many people like you, is that you only see LP and rank rather then your own personal skill and ability. Climbing has absolutely nothing to do with all these ranks that you keep looking at, climbing and progressing should come naturally with improving as a player, which is the only thing you should really care about. You said you want to become diamond? go and focus on improving and learning on how to get better and stop looking at your elo.
> [{quoted}](name=mistry,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=fHVRJ44w,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2020-01-12T23:54:05.977+0000) > > The problem you have, and many people like you, is that you only see LP and rank rather then your own personal skill and ability. > > Climbing has absolutely nothing to do with all these ranks that you keep looking at, climbing and progressing should come naturally with improving as a player, which is the only thing you should really care about. > > You said you want to become diamond? go and focus on improving and learning on how to get better and stop looking at your elo. **While you are right**, you are making a point which is totally irrelevant to the discussion. You're essentially telling him that setting goals is totally irrelevant cause all that matters is your skill. With skill, the rank will come. Yes. But what about time? That is what OP is saying. It is demotivating to see yourself climb to the same rank you've already achieved. Especially when league of legends is the most time demanding game out there. Also, rank is considered an indication of skill. So if you care about your rank, don't you care about your skill? You're also not taking time investment into consideration. It is hugely demoralising to have a number telling you that you've taken 5 steps forwards, and for some reason you're now forced to take 10 steps back. It is a poor decision on behalf of riot games, and absolutely should not be defended. This is a game after all. If the game makes you feel feelings that are the opposite of any kind of passion, then the devs have failed. That simple. New seasons aren't only for the current players, they are also for drawing new players in. A new player seeing a post like this could very easily be driven away from the game.
: like shaco's boxes and invisibility? or teemo's shrooms? you need that and the fact she has no counter play to an ability is bullcrap
> [{quoted}](name=MirirLightHammer,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=zKyL9zK9,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-30T12:44:04.700+0000) > > like shaco's boxes and invisibility? or teemo's shrooms? you need that and the fact she has no counter play to an ability is bullcrap Nice, but you are comparing shacos Tp+ invis to an akali where you can specifically see where she can be invis unlike shaco. That is a big difference. And his boxes can be countered with oracle lens, same as akali.... also his boxes give you a feer debuff. Teemos shrooms you can play around, same as you can play around akalis w, you walk away. Akali has 25 seconds where you can engage her after she used her w, so I dont see why youre complaning about it. She also has energy problems, which now even got worse. So to me it just sounds like you're complaining about a champion that has more strict "rules" to her kit than others. nice Teemo is ranged, has a cc which hard counters all AA champs. Also gets insane vision with his shrooms. so a very bad example.
: i mean for good. not "when she is near a turret she is visible" but "using oracle lenses or a control ward reveals her". also, they should put a regular CD on her Q and remove the absurd casting cost
> [{quoted}](name=MirirLightHammer,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=zKyL9zK9,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-29T15:53:56.015+0000) > > i mean for good. not "when she is near a turret she is visible" but "using oracle lenses or a control ward reveals her". also, they should put a regular CD on her Q and remove the absurd casting cost You can't have 1 75 gold item remove an entire ability that the champ is based on.
: > [{quoted}](name=Brochacho,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=xBddq89X,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-24T11:38:02.932+0000) > > Then we have the actual punishment system, where they perma ban you so that you have to create a new account and buy new skins. This is a fact. People who get permabanned rebuy alot of their skins, or buy new ones just because "I used to have that". If a permaban really meant that riot doesn't want you to play their game, they would IP ban you like they did T1. > You can't IP ban someone in league (you can but that would ban a lot of people) and they didn't IP ban tyler1. when ever he streamed league he got banned, as long as he went incognito with his accounts he was fine. So once riot found out who he was, they instantly ban him.
> [{quoted}](name=My Legit Banana,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=xBddq89X,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2019-05-24T15:26:51.507+0000) > > You can't IP ban someone in league (you can but that would ban a lot of people) and they didn't IP ban tyler1. > when ever he streamed league he got banned, as long as he went incognito with his accounts he was fine. > So once riot found out who he was, they instantly ban him. Oh, I was pretty certain he was. But alright, I'll take your word for it :) My statement still stands tho, the only reason they don't IP ban you is purely for monetary reasons.
RayleighTT (EUNE)
: well kids are more easy to get trap ,adults actually no give anymore a %%%% ... , is like %%%% effects why should i need them , and what's the point , someone asked me why i have 300 k on jinx and not upgrading skill level to 7 =)) , i shoulded told him that i never catched s =)) since then ,who the %%%% need lv 6 or lv 7 skill level
> [{quoted}](name=RayleighTT,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=qGmzlMtZ,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-24T21:56:20.712+0000) > > well kids are more easy to get trap ,adults actually no give anymore a %%%% ... , is like %%%% effects why should i need them , and what's the point , someone asked me why i have 300 k on jinx and not upgrading skill level to 7 =)) , i shoulded told him that i never catched s =)) since then ,who the %%%% need lv 6 or lv 7 skill level Yes, exactly, and this game is focused towards kids. Or rather our inner kid. as do all games. They have just figured out another way to monetize it. But yes I agree with you, You must certainly be... special... to actually rebuy skins. I have seen it so many times at this point, that people who argue against the fact that it happens are either in denial, fanboys or just blind. If riot specifically doesn't want you to play their game then they would IP ban, simple as that.
: > So using a system that is based on a 1 v 1 game is stupid. Just because everyone is calling it ELO system it's not the same. Winrate is the only stat that makes sense because all other stats influence your winrate. Of course it needs to be weighed according to MMR of other players in the game. > Saying "if he can, so can you" isn't either fair. This is absolutely fair. Claiming that games are always lost because of others is just plain bs. In the long run you are the only deciding factor on your games that you can influence. And the fact that players like Yassuo (and basically every high diamond player) can climb the ladder easily is enough proof that a players skill matters. > Also, well as I see it, I can let any of my mates play on my account. Boosting or not, still consider it mine, even tho it isnt. Riot writes in their ToS that they have the right to with or without reason to Perma ban your account, and /or take away skins or not, as you are only "borrowing" the account from them. Well, it isn't so simple. If Riot takes away content from someone without proof they are susceptible to law suits and additionally would lose trust of playerbase - that's why they don't do it. If you clearly violate their ToS then it is easy to perma your account without possible reaction
> [{quoted}](name=Il Sten lI,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=c3EhV3Yt,comment-id=000400010000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-25T11:26:42.129+0000) > > Just because everyone is calling it ELO system it's not the same. Winrate is the only stat that makes sense because all other stats influence your winrate. Of course it needs to be weighed according to MMR of other players in the game. > > This is absolutely fair. Claiming that games are always lost because of others is just plain bs. In the long run you are the only deciding factor on your games that you can influence. And the fact that players like Yassuo (and basically every high diamond player) can climb the ladder easily is enough proof that a players skill matters. > Riot writes in their ToS that they have the right to with or without reason to Perma ban your account, and /or take away skins or not, as you are only "borrowing" the account from them. > > Well, it isn't so simple. If Riot takes away content from someone without proof they are susceptible to law suits and additionally would lose trust of playerbase - that's why they don't do it. If you clearly violate their ToS then it is easy to perma your account without possible reaction Mate youre telling me that a basketball player that loses every game in the season is responsible for it? Not at all. Your team can drag you down, continously. Fair enough Diamond players and YAssuo can climb it relatively easy, but Yassuo himself has gotten stuck in low elo. You're really going to tell me that it is plain bullshit? Even hashinshin says it himself. He has specifically noted aswell that the queueing system works as such that you are queued with lesser players after have been queued with better. Hence winning streaks and losing streaks. If you even want to deny that, then well I seriously question how much league you've actually played. So please don't say that your team can't drag you down in every game, cause they can. If you still don't want to buy it, well that is your opinion. And well, if you read their ToS, it specifically says that riot has the right to with or without reason to take the account away from you
: Many diamond players are boosted. If it's an egirl main that, for example, doesn't mean much. But the real problem would be that almost every rank has it's own playstyle. If you want to carry you need to pick something that allows you to do that on the particular rank and you have to adapt to that playstyle. You'll usually will not see understanding of macro on low gold level. Like the example, if your kda is 20 and yet lose you failed to transfer your lead into the success of other lanes or objectives. Take someone like Yassuo as example - yes, he actually lost games in lower ranks but he still managed to climb very fast... And last but not least: there are 1v1 tourneys if that is your jam - LoL is a 5v5 team game so better not compare it to single player games. edit: > I have had diamond 1 players play on my account Account sharing and boosting can get your account permabanned.
> [{quoted}](name=Il Sten lI,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=c3EhV3Yt,comment-id=0004000100000000,timestamp=2019-05-14T05:23:35.075+0000) > > Many diamond players are boosted. If it's an egirl main that, for example, doesn't mean much. > But the real problem would be that almost every rank has it's own playstyle. If you want to carry you need to pick something that allows you to do that on the particular rank and you have to adapt to that playstyle. You'll usually will not see understanding of macro on low gold level. > > Like the example, if your kda is 20 and yet lose you failed to transfer your lead into the success of other lanes or objectives. Take someone like Yassuo as example - yes, he actually lost games in lower ranks but he still managed to climb very fast... > > And last but not least: there are 1v1 tourneys if that is your jam - LoL is a 5v5 team game so better not compare it to single player games. > > edit: > > Account sharing and boosting can get your account permabanned. Exactly. Lol is a 5 v 5 game. So using a system that is based on a 1 v 1 game is stupid. You literally just agreed to what I said. That with being able to transfer your lead into the success of other lanes or objectives, isn't as easy as you make it out to be. The "just do it" mentality is what gets people tilted. Cause you're taking away 9 other factors in the game. Inting is real, and not even Yassuo can carry some games. Champion pick is only that relevant. Saying "if he can, so can you" isn't either fair. Yassuo is a consistent challenger player. You can't really compare him to any other ELO as He has mastered aspects of the game that we aren't even aware of. Also, well as I see it, I can let any of my mates play on my account. Boosting or not, still consider it mine, even tho it isnt. Riot writes in their ToS that they have the right to with or without reason to Perma ban your account, and /or take away skins or not, as you are only "borrowing" the account from them. Makes the rules kind of pointless no?
RayleighTT (EUNE)
: i can assure you that they not spending more money on buying skins .. , expecially when they ain't confident about them behaviour and the posibility of getting back where they leaved from.
> [{quoted}](name=RayleighTT,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=qGmzlMtZ,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-05-14T12:55:55.157+0000) > > i can assure you that they not spending more money on buying skins .. , expecially when they ain't confident about them behaviour and the posibility of getting back where they leaved from. Really? I have at least 5 friends who have been perma banned, stopped playing for a short while, then come back. Then riot releases a skin for their select champ (as they only do skins for the most popularly played champs). Accept it or not but people do buy skins again. You are writing as if people are logical beings. They aren't. They are emotional. Not saying I am not. Just calling it the way I've seen it time and time again.
Aeffen (EUW)
: I'm tired of losing LP/getting timeouts for dodging because the client takes 5-10 seconds to lock in
PC specs: GPU: Rtx 2070 8GB OC Windforce CPU: Ryzen 2600X RAM: 3200 MHZ CL 16 1 TB of SSD B450 MSI motherboard. I have seen alot of the people posting on this forums blaming ones pc etc. But it is the garbage client which eats up like 10% of my cpu and was up to 30% on my i5 6600k. And for what? a few pictures and matchmaking?? Not to mention all the problems the client has every week. After reading countless of these posts I've come to the conclusion that Riot is simply too greedy for money. This is why: Client and game is optimised for low end pcs. It actively punishes you for having a high spec pc. Same reason why the graphics in the game are still horrible, I mean zoom in on xin zhao in game... Horrible. Or just the grass textures on the ground, you can literally see the squares. This to be able to appeal to an audience who are clearly not interested in playing the game seriously (which people are if they spend 20 -40 min/game), yet they are pushing their tournaments down our throates along with skins, that are way beyond overpriced. Then we have the actual punishment system, where they perma ban you so that you have to create a new account and buy new skins. This is a fact. People who get permabanned rebuy alot of their skins, or buy new ones just because "I used to have that". If a permaban really meant that riot doesn't want you to play their game, they would IP ban you like they did T1. So to answer your question, it is because of their own greed. If you can't afford a decent PC, then play on console, that is what they are for. The budget alternative to a gaming pc. And don't come with the argument that games are more expensive for consoles. You can buy them both preowned and/or wait for a sale. Not to mention the 6 free games you get every month with xbox live and ps plus.
RayleighTT (EUNE)
: that would mean that if the chat is removed ,automatly all permanent bans issued for chat behaviour should no longer exist and should be considered nule as there is no way anymore of talking and comparing people of what means normal behaviour or negative behaviour among accounts . At least in my teory this would mean no chat ,no chat punishments , no permanent ban for how you talked should exist and neither accounts banned for that if the game itself have a less component who can't anymore used to express negatively.
> [{quoted}](name=RayleighTT,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=qGmzlMtZ,comment-id=0000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-12T21:31:35.854+0000) > > that would mean that if the chat is removed ,automatly all permanent bans issued for chat behaviour should no longer exist and should be considered nule as there is no way anymore of talking and comparing people of what means normal behaviour or negative behaviour among accounts . > > At least in my teory this would mean no chat ,no chat punishments , no permanent ban for how you talked should exist and neither accounts banned for that if the game itself have a less component who can't anymore used to express negatively. What are you talking about? It doesn't mean shit, They just remove the chat and keep all the bans. It is like saying that Because riot is against sexism, it doesn't occur at their HQ. https://kotaku.com/inside-the-culture-of-sexism-at-riot-games-1828165483 Have a fun reading mate Btw Logic doesn't apply
schokioki (EUW)
: What purpose does the chat serve after champion selection? Why not remove it?
Cause riot is making money out of the people they get to perma ban. Those people simply create a new account, and buy skins. It is a win win, they keep the player and gets him to pay for skins. Yes it is easy to say what you should do and shouldnt, but reality is that people do just that, and riot has no reason to stop. HEll I even admitted to riot games support that I have a problem with writing in league chat, asked them if they could extend my Chat restriction or if there is someway to remove the chat, and all they said is "no"
cojibear (EUW)
: this bug is still in game??
Jcmana (EUW)
: Opt-in for longer queue with more narrow skill-level matchmaking
Legit, It would fix the problem with league of legends. Losing feels like shit while winning could literally be described with "meh". Because you end up with 5 year olds and play against 20 year olds. If you'd play a game that isn't based on "who ints first" you might actually have fun. But that game isn't league
: That's the only way to do it. If you have a kda of 20 and yet lose that simply implies you are a bad player. And all player MMRs are taken into calculation, too.
> [{quoted}](name=Il Sten lI,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=c3EhV3Yt,comment-id=00040001,timestamp=2019-05-13T06:00:43.873+0000) > > That's the only way to do it. If you have a kda of 20 and yet lose that simply implies you are a bad player. And all player MMRs are taken into calculation, too. You don't even play the same game (damn aram players...) and you're telling people they are bad for losing a game when their kda is 20? Or sorry it "implies" that you're bad. Like saying that drowning is an implication that you can't swim. I have had diamond 1 players play on my account, with a higher kda than that, who have stood up after the game and said: Uncarriable. You seriously think the mmr system is good for a game such as league? You even know where the system comes from? Chess mate, a 1 v 1 game, where your own actions punish you in terms of mmr. Leauge punishes you for the mistakes of others harder than it punishes you for your own mistakes. But hey "Just carry bro" "if you can't carry 0/17 you shouldn't even play this game"
Roselvet (EUW)
: Repercussions for reports regarding trolling, AFK and inting - (solution to a long standing issue?)
Too bad riot games as a company is too low iq to understand that using an automated system the way it is used, is just going to make the player base more and more toxic. Your suggestion is indeed good, but Riot Games is making too much money on people who get perma banned - they just buy new skins on new accounts. I mean you can't have a system that punishes you for using words, literally how the system works. Getting banned for using the word %%% in relation to ciggarettes... absurd. But hey, ban the guys using words, that YOU CHOOSE to read, instead of the guys running it down and just typing "?" Nice riot cucks Sexist bastards
Rioter Comments
Ulizakunje (EUNE)
: Permanent ban for flaming?
People here are legit either %%%%%%ed or 10 years old... There is a mute function for a reason. Not using it is YOUR choice. If you permaban an account, the flamer will just create a new one, same with trollers. Chatban is good. What these riot cucks are coming with are nothing but excuses. Riot games system is flawed and promotes discrimination to support their own policies. Riot games themselves have agreed with this, or at least their support has. Open your damn eyes and stop seeing a permaban as a result for everything. If a player gets chatbanned and then starts trolling, then yes, he can get permabanned, but not for flaming. It just doesn't make any sense. Simply a way for riot games to take your money and then tell you to %%%% off.
Rioter Comments

CasabIancas

Level 198 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion