Nxether (EUW)
: Can't get the mastery chest after achieving an S- rank (Screenshots below)
have you already earned a box with Kai'sa? you can only attain one box per S per champ per season afaik
: How do you know who has first pick anyways? It seems like in most my games enemy have priority over picks
when the lobby 'starts' over either your team or the enemy team will be 'First Pick'. I think it disappears either after banning phase, or after the first pick has locked in, unsure which
xAG Rewd (EUW)
: Teammates shouldn't be able to ban another teammates
i ban the same champion every game, what makes you think i am gonna change what i do to suit you (granted if you are first pick, i may let you have it, but other than that... %%%% NO)
DoomBird (EUW)
: Profile - Stats don't work?
i have played my placements and 11 further games over the past week or so, yet my stats pages says 'No ranked or normal games played this season, please play some games to unlock your stats'
Mada (EUW)
: laws don't matter
> [{quoted}](name=Mada,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6caWJkAA,comment-id=0000000300000002,timestamp=2019-07-08T13:54:50.218+0000) > > laws don't matter i guess thats why everyone goes around stealing from everyone else, and occasionally commiting the odd murder right? obvious troll is obvious...
: I think you are trying to analyze this too deep... You take every word too literally and then continue explaining stuff which maybe sounds smart but it isn't. You don't answer his question on how to avoid smurfs but just say "don't play it because it's against rules". Who knows maybe his parents agreed or his brother to terms of service. When did I say it's ok? Dude what are you smoking? With such toxicity in the game it may be bad influence for kids but having access to internet alone gives them ability to see far worse stuff. I never did say it was ok just because there are worse things out there. Honestly you probably break ToS rules daily without even knowing it. These are rules and not laws so I don't think 12 year old kid playing a game rated for 13 year old kids is something you could bring people to court.
> [{quoted}](name=GrìmoreWeiss,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6caWJkAA,comment-id=000000030000000100000000,timestamp=2019-07-07T21:31:20.089+0000) > > I think you are trying to analyze this too deep... and you are sticking your head in the sand, your point? > You take every word too literally and then continue explaining stuff which maybe sounds smart but it isn't. You don't answer his question on how to avoid smurfs but just say "don't play it because it's against rules". except i did answer his question.... answer this, if his brother stopped playing, do you think he would 'face trolls'? >Who knows maybe his parents agreed or his brother to terms of service. which, as i have stated would be FRAUD > When did I say it's ok? Dude what are you smoking? With such toxicity in the game it may be bad influence for kids but having access to internet alone gives them ability to see far worse stuff. I never did say it was ok just because there are worse things out there. so, if by this sentence you are not implying that because there are worse things that could be done (say, having unfettered access to the internet) that makes his rule breaking fine, and i am making a fuss about nothing, what is your point in making this statement? > Honestly you probably break ToS rules daily without even knowing it. These are rules and not laws so I don't think 12 year old kid playing a game rated for 13 year old kids is something you could bring people to court. you seem to think that the person making the account is the one breaking the law, when in actuality, it is RIOT breaking the law allowing them to play, while the player may not be brought to court, RIOT themselves are at risk also, as i have pointed out in other comments in this thread, please answer this. if this guy is free to break the age limit set by the ToS, doesnt that mean i am free to break the ToS concerning toxic behaviour? and if not, why not? wouldnt that be a double standard?
: You are not police so calm down man. This topic asks one question but suddenly it's like carnival were everyone is dressed like swat team and try to explain the law... Honestly any online game is bad influence to kids. Still only having access to internet let's the kids see anything they want which if far worse than a normal game where worst thing is people that can say mean things.
> [{quoted}](name=GrìmoreWeiss,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6caWJkAA,comment-id=0000000300000001,timestamp=2019-07-07T20:31:48.429+0000) > > You are not police so calm down man. where did i claim i was the police? >This topic asks one question indeed, and i answered that question (how do i stop my brother facing smurfs) by saying maybe he shouldnt play the game, considering the ToS says he shouldnt be playing... > but suddenly it's like carnival were everyone is dressed like swat team and try to explain the law... all i said was that the law exists (and RIOT are breaking it by 'allowing' >13yr olds to play) i wasnt trying to explain anything... > Honestly any online game is bad influence to kids. Still only having access to internet let's the kids see anything they want which if far worse than a normal game where worst thing is people that can say mean things. so you say any online game is a bad influence, then in the same sentence say its 'ok' because there are 'worse things that the kids could be doing' isnt that a complete contradiction?
Adama (EUW)
: So many people that dodge queues.
its not so much that they are 'wasting time for everyone in the lobby' its just that, if they wait and someone else dodges they dont get the LP or time penalty for dodging themselves, so they wait as long as possible to give other potential dodgers the chance to dodge. as to your second paragraph, i wholeheartedly agree, it can get very annoying very quickly ><
Fos (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Yraco,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6caWJkAA,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2019-07-07T11:04:57.477+0000) > > The ToS say that you must be 13 years of age and, if you aren't considered an adult, you must have a parent/guardian agree to the ToS. > It's highly unlikely that this will ever actually matter or get them banned though. I mainly asked if it was a joke for 2 reasons and you basically typed the same thing as the other guy's comment. First, the thread is about a guy asking asking for a solution to a problem, the problem being that smurfs ''exist'', the fact that his brother is mentioned in this thread is just a side thing, it's not the issue. Pretty much any 9 year old can make an account clamming that he/she is over 18. So anyone can bypass that. Which brings us to the second reason. Tell me who actually follows any age restrictions in any games? There is no reason for one even to mention this since nobody follows it, and nobody gets punished and why would they? For playing the game? The pocket is more important than the rules.
> [{quoted}](name=Fos,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6caWJkAA,comment-id=0000000100000000,timestamp=2019-07-07T11:27:15.626+0000) > > > First, the thread is about a guy asking asking for a solution to a problem, the problem being that smurfs ''exist'', the fact that his brother is mentioned in this thread is just a side thing, it's not the issue. > he is asking for help with a problem, yes i would agree, but the problem he is asking about has to do with his brother facing smurfs. his brother, according to the ToS SHOULDNT EVEN BE PLAYING THE GAME... if he follows that rule, the problem suddenly disappears for him... that was the point i was trying to make > Pretty much any 9 year old can make an account clamming that he/she is over 18. So anyone can bypass that. > you know that would be fraud right? > Which brings us to the second reason. > Tell me who actually follows any age restrictions in any games? > just because noone 'follows' the rules, doesnt mean the rules dont exist > There is no reason for one even to mention this since nobody follows it, and nobody gets punished and why would they? For playing the game? > if it is against the law, then yes they (RIOT in this case, not the player) SHOULD be punished > The pocket is more important than the rules. one of those rules is no flaming, am i free to ignore this rule too?
: wait, what are you talking about. Playing games that are over your age is not %%%%ing ILLIEGAL. Just against tos.
i think you misunderstand, its not illegal for the player to create the account, but it is illegal for RIOT to 'allow' under 13s to play, which is why section 1.1 of https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/legal/termsofuse is there i am not saying the player is breaking the law, i am saying RIOT is by having >13yrs olds playing...
: > [{quoted}](name=Neumím Riven,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=0UwxBgBd,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-07-07T16:14:38.852+0000) > > And? Typical day on internet. If you get mad about this thing you should either avoid this game or track that guy IP an deal with him IRL I'm not mad to be honest, it's just few days ago i responded to some other guy with human manners (No flaming, etc).. you can find the post of chat logs i made, anyways.. how did i get punished and this guy doesn't while using 'Insta-ban' words? that baffles me.
> [{quoted}](name=Snake Expert,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=0UwxBgBd,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-07-07T16:16:32.604+0000) > > how did i get punished and this guy doesn't while using 'Insta-ban' words? that baffles me. except its NOT an insta ban word, and certainly isnt 'zero tolerance' as RIOT would lead you to believe
: %%%%ing LUL I played Tekken when I was 10 wake up pls. It doesnt matter
it kinda does when it breaks the law....
: Lol but this game is PEGI 14 last time i checked, he should play fortnite or smthing that's for 12 yos
really? https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/legal/termsofuse look at 1.1
: this game is advertised as 12+ in some countries so it makes sense hes 12 and playing and i started as 8 year old but on a different account but it got hacked
i HIGHLY doubt that https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/legal/termsofuse section 1.1 Only people ages 13 or older may create an account or use the Riot Services. If you’re at least 13 years old, but not yet legally considered an “adult” in the country you live in, you must ask one of your parents (or other legal guardians) to read this Agreement and accept it on your behalf. You may not create or use an account or use any of the Riot Services on behalf of a legal entity or for a commercial purpose.
: NEW PLAYERS GETTING FORCED TO GO AGAINST A SMURF
your little brother is 12 and has started playing? you realise this is against ToS right?
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: i'm gonna pick mf ap mid against zed every time just to get people like you banned;) Reason: it's not a stupidly bad pick since you can easly harrass him and keep your distance. your only problem is lack of mobility. Also renekton in support is pretty busted when played correctly, but useless when played wrong
> [{quoted}](name=M3GTRDragon,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=AKs9oPZV,comment-id=00020001,timestamp=2019-07-03T12:37:14.914+0000) > > i > > you can easly harrass him and keep your distance. your only problem is lack of mobility. > > how do you keep your distance with a lack of mobility?!?
: Spectate Bug.......
Go to C:\Riot Games\League of Legends\Config and delete the file called LeagueClientSettings.YAML then relog.
: account stuck
Go to C:\Riot Games\League of Legends\Config and delete the file called LeagueClientSettings.YAML then relog. This happened to me a few days ago and doing this worked for me
: 1h45 and 30 min.later it is always 1h45min. Wtf:)))
: Riot shit company
you realise its a beta right?
Flendurs (EUW)
: TFT bug
champions can only be 'played' (or returned to bench) during the preperation phase.
: Human patience has a limit
chat bans are a HUGE contradiction and shouldn't exist imo
: are u sure it´s 30min? we are in queue for 40 now and nothing
what he/she means is, when you press 'play' you are not actually queueing for the first 30 mins of the counter, so in effect if its showing 40mins for you, you have only been in the queue for 10mins
: You clearly havent read what I said and now try to somehow win the argument my mocking with the most ridiculous way. What a pathetic attempt. Go back to kindergarden, child, you dont belong here. >There is no prisoner's island anymore So its just a coincidence that now that Im chat restricted, I have a lot more flamers/afk/inters? Is that what you are saying?
> [{quoted}](name=Android 18 Love,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Y6XgVBXZ,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-06-08T08:43:47.126+0000) > > > So its just a coincidence that now that Im chat restricted, I have a lot more flamers/afk/inters? Is that what you are saying? YES
: > [{quoted}](name=Conphucius,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=000000000000000100000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-30T02:07:17.374+0000) > > 'riot doesh't act upon private messages > > so you AGREE then that there IS an instance where they DO tolerate it then? > > all their policies are only applicable for the public chat > > care to explain WHY? as stated, there IS an instance where they tolerate what they claim to be 'zero tolerance' words, so their insistance that these phrases are zero tolerance is an outright %%%%ing LIE They don't tolerate it. They can't act upon it. Ever heard of the law ? You know, that thing that says Riot can't look at private conversations unless you disclose them ?
thanks for the implication that i am lying about someone telling me to kill myself.... just one question, WHY would i have need to doctor a screenshot for the purposes you state?
: > [{quoted}](name=Conphucius,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=000000000000000100000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-30T02:07:17.374+0000) > > 'riot doesh't act upon private messages > > so you AGREE then that there IS an instance where they DO tolerate it then? > > all their policies are only applicable for the public chat > > care to explain WHY? as stated, there IS an instance where they tolerate what they claim to be 'zero tolerance' words, so their insistance that these phrases are zero tolerance is an outright %%%%ing LIE They don't tolerate it. They can't act upon it. Ever heard of the law ? You know, that thing that says Riot can't look at private conversations unless you disclose them ?
'you know that thing that says Riot can't look at private conversations unless you disclose them' well guess what, i DID disclose them, i sent them 2 screenshots of the behaviour AFTER SENDING THEM SCREENSHOTS their response was 'because it was a private chat, we do not have access to what was said, therefore we will not be taking action' 'we do not have access to what was said' YES THEY DO I SENT THEM SCREENSHOTS
: > [{quoted}](name=Conphucius,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=0000000000000001000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-29T18:07:27.420+0000) > > so then, they are lying when they say they have a 0 tolerance policy, as there IS a place where it is tolerated, namely private chat. > > i had someone add me last month to tell me to kill myself, to get cancer and to get ebola, at least 2 of these are considered 0 tolerance, and i would hope the 3rd example i have listed is also considered the same, but when i reported the person through a ticket i was told that because it was a 'private chat' between 'friends' they couldnt access it, and claimed to not know what was said, even when i submitted multiple screenshots of the conversation... the guy had also said (vsible in the screenshot) that he was not worried when i told him i would report him, as nothing would be done, the support agent confirmed this and closed the ticket > > TL:DR telling someone to kill themselves is NOT zero tolerance as in private chats its tolerated I mean, it's known that Riot doesn't act upon private message as you added the person in your firendlist... All their policies are only applicable for the public chat.
'riot doesh't act upon private messages so you AGREE then that there IS an instance where they DO tolerate it then? all their policies are only applicable for the public chat care to explain WHY? as stated, there IS an instance where they tolerate what they claim to be 'zero tolerance' words, so their insistance that these phrases are zero tolerance is an outright %%%%ing LIE
: > [{quoted}](name=Conphucius,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=00000000000000010000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-29T17:43:49.840+0000) > > so what does that have to do with the number 0 and the word tolerance? > > to me, 0 tolerance means 'we have NO tolerance whatsoever for what we call '0 tolerance' and therefore any instance of such phrases will be instantly punished, at a harsher rate than 'non-0 tolerance' things' > > would you agree with this definition? Yes. And that's exactly what is described. No warning, straight and direct ban.
so then, they are lying when they say they have a 0 tolerance policy, as there IS a place where it is tolerated, namely private chat. i had someone add me last month to tell me to kill myself, to get cancer and to get ebola, at least 2 of these are considered 0 tolerance, and i would hope the 3rd example i have listed is also considered the same, but when i reported the person through a ticket i was told that because it was a 'private chat' between 'friends' they couldnt access it, and claimed to not know what was said, even when i submitted multiple screenshots of the conversation... the guy had also said (vsible in the screenshot) that he was not worried when i told him i would report him, as nothing would be done, the support agent confirmed this and closed the ticket TL:DR telling someone to kill themselves is NOT zero tolerance as in private chats its tolerated
: > [{quoted}](name=Conphucius,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=000000000000000100000000,timestamp=2019-05-29T16:58:48.331+0000) > > that does NOTHING to explain what '0 tolerance' means, all it says is they have a '0 tolerance policy' and that it results in skipping parts of the punishment 'escalation path' but doesnt actually say what '0 tolerance' means > > so i will ask again, what does '0 tolerance' exactly mean 0 tolerance is the fact that they skip steps for certain exceptionnal chatlogs.
so what does that have to do with the number 0 and the word tolerance? to me, 0 tolerance means 'we have NO tolerance whatsoever for what we call '0 tolerance' and therefore any instance of such phrases will be instantly punished, at a harsher rate than 'non-0 tolerance' things' would you agree with this definition?
: > [{quoted}](name=Conphucius,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=0000000000000001,timestamp=2019-05-29T16:27:43.033+0000) > > would you care to explain '0 tolerance' please No. Riot will do that for me. https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/207489286-Instant-Feedback-System-FAQ-#h1q4
that does NOTHING to explain what '0 tolerance' means, all it says is they have a '0 tolerance policy' and that it results in skipping parts of the punishment 'escalation path' but doesnt actually say what '0 tolerance' means so i will ask again, what does '0 tolerance' exactly mean
: > [{quoted}](name=Tinnywizzard,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=ZPM3l5pO,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-05-29T15:31:16.649+0000) > > oh but it was only for game doesnt seem fair If was only the last straw and you use 0 tolerance words. Guess what, making fun of disabilities like autism isn't fair either.
would you care to explain '0 tolerance' please
Lukelly (EUW)
: reread everything..... when did i state that this wasnt a bug???? im simply stating why this could have happened, **whether or not this is intended is the reason im saying this** i mean, look at the page title and category.
'she knocks the first champ she hits and since mao isnt immune' thats the specific part i was responding too, he SHOULD be immune to it, and yes i would agree that it is a bug unless he W to vi and 'hit' her before the dash finished, appearing in front of her, and therefore her Q in finishing its animation hit the now not immune mao which would imply it isnt bugged i may have misinterpreted what you were saying (because it wasnt very clear) apologies for that
Lukelly (EUW)
: but even tho vi q isnt a targetted ability, she knocks the first champ she hits and since mao isnt immune it probs registers it as a hit and stops the dash.
reread the second part... becoming untargetable during Twisted advance will _**PREVENT MAOKAI FROM BEING HIT BY NON TARGETED ABILITIES**_
Lukelly (EUW)
: well its probs because vi's q isnt a targeted ability, so you being untargetable doesnt really matter. she will dash foward, hit you and so stop the w. if you was completely immne from being hit at all or unstoppable it would make sense, bt you are merely untargetable.
Maokais W makes him untagetable to anything (he is underground, she would have gone over him) from https://leagueoflegends.fandom.com/wiki/Maokai Maokai will follow any dash or blink except global Blink or Dash ( Recall, Teleport, Paranoia, Gate, Stand United,...). Becoming untargetable during Twisted Advance will prevent Maokai from being hit by non-targeted abilities ( Flame Chompers!, Requiem) as well as stop turrets and non-champion units from targeting him.
: There where no 'grounding' champions on the enemy team. I used my W and Vi would use Q towards me and I would be hit by it. The only thing that I think might have happend is that the Q hits me just as the W almost finishes and that interrupts it.
in which case its wouldnt have been a bug, as her Q makes her root/slow immune, if you 'hit' her during her dash and 'appeared' in front of her, her Q would still have hit, however if her dash was already 'finished' BEFORE you popped up you should have rooted her, the timing is key here :) edit to ask: were you W to her or someone behind her? edit 2: i'm wrong on the immunity, thats her ult, my bad
: Possible Maokai bug
are you sure you were not trying to dash over a 'grounding' area (singed W/cass W etc etc) dont quote me on this, but this may disable it mid dash (kinda like if enemy becomes untargetable mid dash it ends Maokais dash)
Roxãs (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Humpelstilzche,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=VWkR932T,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-05-16T18:29:44.610+0000) > > Potentially yes. Insulting other players is not allowed. It doesn't matter why you think you have to do it, it's forbidden no matter what. Even if someone else is a waaaaaay bigger jerk than you are, that doesn't mean the rules don't apply to you anymore. They always apply. Flaming is never allowed. > > You can report whoever you want for whatever you want at any time. The question is rather if the report is going to lead to anything. Banning champions is not forbidden, so in this case this report would probably be useless. the support doesnt care for ticket reports since they always mention the ingame report function. but i guess when the insult is heavy enough, this would be noticed too by the support
> [{quoted}](name=Roxãs,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=VWkR932T,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2019-05-16T19:20:14.096+0000) > > > but i guess when the insult is heavy enough, no such thing as 'heavy enough' i had someone add me to tell me to kill myself, and RIOT didnt give a shit because it was 'private chat'
: fix your servers rito
noone can help you on the boards, i suggest, if its still an issue that you do what the 'notorious message' says and contact support...
Arcade Lulu (EUNE)
: racism, homophobic slurs, sexism, telling other people to kill themselves, extreme insults, threats etc are zero tolerance
except they are not... to me, zero tolerance means ANY instance of saying those phrases would be punishible which is just NOT the case, i had someone add me to tell me to kill myself, to get cancer and to get ebola, had a screenshot as proof of said conversation, which i sent to RIOT.... their reply was 'it was said in a private chat, we dont have access to the chat, therefore we dont know what was said (even with a screenshot as evidence) therefore we will do nothing so, being that there is an instance in which these phrases are free to be used without repurcussion, there is NO such thing as 'zero tolerance'
Arcade Lulu (EUNE)
: zero tolerance words are an instant 14 day ban *post chat logs*
no such thing as 'zero tolerance'
: Thats why theres a block feature.
so please enlighten me... why do chat bans exist? i mean there is a mute feature after all...
: So that's what's Riot games focusing on instead of fixing their dumb AI for example :D. Very stupid admin that banned him for that. People are allowed to speak about anything they want as long as you don't insult others
unless of course they do it in 'private chat' on friends list, then RIOT dont give a flying %%%%, even about 'zero tolerance' phrases i had someone add me to tell me to kill myself, to get ebola and to get cancer, then brag about how my report (i told him i had a screenshot and would send to riot) would do nothing turns out he was right, the support rep i spoke to said that because it was a private chat, that they dont have access to and therefore cannot see (ie. completely ignoring the screenshot i sent with the ticket) they would be doing nothing, yet funnily enough he was able to mention that the guy in question (who had told me to kill myself) was (quote) 'would deserve a punishment he is kind of right, we cannot take actions on private chats since they are confidential and we do not have access on them'. the support agent has now put the status of my ticket (after questioning this response) on hold for the past 24 hours and the 'ticket assigned to' field on the right of the screen is now blank so they are just ignoring my issue...
PREED1 (EUW)
: try writing k y s a few of time in all chat let see what happen mr you get not banned for telling people people to kill themself
i had someone add me and tell me to kill myself, tell me to get ebola and tell me to get cancer i made a screenshot of it and sent it to RIOT as part of my ticket RIOTs response 'it was said in a private chat which we dont have access too, as we do not know what was said (even with a screenshot....) we will do nothing' though strangely, even though they 'do not know what was said' the support guy was able to respond to the comment made in the private chat from the other guy basically bragging that my report would do nothing seeing as how it was a private chat...informing me that HE was correct, and basically telling me i was wrong to report someone for telling me to kill myself
: So Riot can ban people for spoiling a movie but cant ban People trolling and intentionally feeding
they also dont ban (or even do ANYTHING) to people that tell people to kill themselves...
: It is called private chat for a reason. They are not allowed to do something...
then RIOTS stance that telling someone to kill themselves is zero tolerance is absolute BS
: > but people who run down mid and are cursed at are free to do so False. Please stop spreading false information. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/264509145766428673/569776210372984872/Screenshot_2019-04-22_at_09.46.49.png My friend's account, who got tilted and ran it down in 1 game.
RIOT need to show consistency in this, they seem to pick and choose wehn they want to ban these people. a couple of days ago i had someone on my friends list tell me to kill myself and wishing me both ebola and cancer, all of which, according to RIOT are 'zero tolerance' offenses. i made a screen shot of said conversation, even where he gloated he was not worried (after i told him i had SS it and would send it to riot) because riot would do nothing about it since it was a private chat turns out he was right, zero tolerance phrases are perfectly fine when said in 'private chat' because (quote from ticket) 'On the other side, as much this guys would deserve a punishment he is kind of right, we cannot take actions on private chats since they are confidential and we do not have access on them so in this case I strongly suggest you not add these people or accept any unknown friend requests' so, the ticket reponse says 'they are confidential and we do not have access to them'... I SENT THEM A %%%%ING SCREENSHOT how do they 'not have access' to it? zero tolerance my ass...
HavickPT (EUW)
: its just me or reports do nothing?
i had someone add me to friends list only for him to tell me to kill myself, to get ebola, and to get cancer i sent a screenshot to RIOT i got the reply 'it was a private chat, we dont know what was said, we wont be doing anything about it' i SENT A %%%%ING SCREENSHOT how can you say you dont know what was said so much for 'zero tolerance'
Iakovia (EUW)
: What are these?
its your change in position since last game i believe (or possibly last log in if you havnt played ranked in a while, not sure on that)
: Yasuos windwall is definetely op. But the reason is the weird hitbox. Spell shields have to block the initial casts. But Backtrack, like you already described is like a zhonyas even after after being cc'ed combined with a retreat. Comparing this to zhonyas+ryze ult which riot stated clearly is a unhealthy mechanic. Blackshield needs to broken be otherwise the target is spell immune. It is extremely powerful but thankfully a signature ability. Killing urgot also stops the second part of his ult. Killing is generally op xD
> [{quoted}](name=Il Sten lI,realm=EUW,application-id=ETj6EdvQ,discussion-id=AYlRQ2IW,comment-id=00000001000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-14T23:05:58.994+0000) > > Yasuos windwall is definetely op. But the reason is the weird hitbox. > so it blocking the chains from his ult isnt OP (as you stated the thing that is OP is the hitbox) but backtrack doing the same thing (blocking the execute) is? isnt this a massive contradiction? >Spell shields have to block the initial casts. But Backtrack, like you already described is like a zhonyas even after after being cc'ed combined with a retreat. > yes sivir and noc have to block the initial projectile, but morgana shield can be put on after the projectile hits but before the chains come out to COMPLETELY nullify the ult, it isnt as though urgot can wait it out and then activate it, its that AS SOON as the black shield is applied, urgot ult goes on CD and the second part cant be used as far as i have seen (correct me if i am wrong) backtrack ONLY makes you immune if it activates DURING the pull, so if urgot ults you and you use backtrack, if he waits the teleport out, he is still free to reactivate it to execute you > Comparing this to zhonyas+ryze ult which riot stated clearly is a unhealthy mechanic. > not really, when a ryze is channeling his ultimate, and hits his zhonyas, he becomes immune to damage yes, but he STOPS channeling (because of the stasis effect) and therefore the ultimate doesnt go off, with backtrack there is no channeling involved > Blackshield needs to broken be otherwise the target is spell immune. It is extremely powerful but thankfully a signature ability. > nope, as soon as the shield hits, urgot can no longer use the second part of his ultimate, it IMMEDIATLY goes on CD, he cant wait it out as you suggest amd what does it being a 'signature ability' have to do with anything? > Killing urgot also stops the second part of his ult. Killing is generally op xD > and breaking the small shield and killing a 'backtracking' enemy stops the backtrack....
: PermaBan changes Please
the clue is in the name... permanent ban means just that... PERMANENT
Show more

Conphucius

Level 136 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion