: I am happy that one for all will be comming back :) But is it really that hard to work on one for all while having a game mode like arurf running like normal. I mean you already have a lot of game modes working so you should be able to just activate them without problems and then keep working on one for all, right?
exactly what I commented before reading your comment. It doesnt make any sense
: Quick Update on Rotating Game Mode
lol why not just repeat one of the old ones that isnt related to any specific theme? Does that affect the development of the one for all mode? I doubt that
: finally somebody recognises the hell us junglers live in its a dark dark world >:(
all I got to say is, if you jungle properly you dont get flamed. I'm not even good at jungling but if you just gank lanes from time to time people wont complain even if you fail. Now if you afk farm and gank every 10 minutes you'll get shit. Not saying it justifies their behaviour but I just got perma banned on my brother's account (gg right?) because of one game where a retar ded jungler wanted to flame more than he ganked PS: I flamed him near the end of the game.
: But many players already have all champions and dont need more of them :/
it should stop giving champion shards to people who either have all champs or have past a certain level. New players actually enjoy getting champion shards
: > [{quoted}](name=FodamseBronzes,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2fUqddgp,comment-id=00100000,timestamp=2018-01-08T16:50:54.464+0000) > > I realize that I can't write some stuff (not even in my own language and not to my brother or friends) but as you said, they used previous games that had led to no punishment as the reason to maintain the punishment which is just wrong, the whole context of this is ridiculous > Yes, I do agree with you that it does sound pretty fishy that they justify a recent ban with old logs. It basically states that if you have been toxic in the past, you're still toxic today. System doesn't seem to understand what "reforming" means, which is pretty alarming. > PS: You make it sound like I'm lying when I say I was talking to my brother but as I said to them, do you think anyone who wasnt my brother would play even a second game with me after getting flamed like that? xD I mean "you could lie and say you talked to your brother" in hopes of getting the ban lifted. Most likely you didn't but if you would be able to get ban lifted by saying it was your brother, then every banned player would try to do that. This is something which requires human input to detect. Human input requires human resources and on a scale of LoL - there is no way Riot is able to hire and maintain that amount of human resources to keep the punishment system effective - hence an automated system is the only logical way. The downside of automatic system is this what you experienced, falsepositive detection of toxic behaviour which results in to collateral damage. If you had not flamed your brother - even as a joke - you wouldn't be banned.
dont get me wrong, it wasnt a joke haha i was flaming him for real but come on, we're brothers and he has flamed me too, the difference is he would yell from his room xD i didnt bother doing that
: Was this whole dilemma part of the "wrong chat logs ban"-stuff? Meaning you got a ban and the chatlogs were not from games that you were toxic in the first place? And after writing to support they aknowledged that the logs were wrong ones and they pulled of some old logs just to point out you have been toxic in the past? If that is the case, then it does feel sort of funky from Riots part and I am with you to that point. However, my opinion to the "new" old logs where there is negativity in portuguese and aimed at your brother - these are correctly labeled as toxic by Riot, these logs should've resulted in to a ban - but months ago, not now. Flaming is flaming no matter what the language is or abbreviations used. It doesn't matter who you flame - other players might not be aware of another player being your sibling, they are also not aware of how your brother takes this "brotherly banter". So as you should understand - there is alot of variables, if's and but's which rely on human understanding of matters of different levels - something an automatic system simply cannot understand. So if these claims that you 'flamed your brother as a joke" or "flamed myself" would be reasons to lift bans - every banned player would argue that they flamed a friend/relative/pet as a joke and get their ban lifted. This is why it does not matter who you flame and how - if flame is detected it should be banned - no matter what. To keep the system working and effective for the ones who really need to be banned from the game. You might not be a toxic player by definition, but you did actions which are considered toxic without context and thus you were "correctly" incorrectly banned and ended up as sort of collateral damage to ensure the system - you knowingly walked the line between ok and not okay and this time you fell down. Tldr: ban reason is valid, timing based on these reasons is invalid.
I realize that I can't write some stuff (not even in my own language and not to my brother or friends) but as you said, they used previous games that had led to no punishment as the reason to maintain the punishment which is just wrong, the whole context of this is ridiculous PS: You make it sound like I'm lying when I say I was talking to my brother but as I said to them, do you think anyone who wasnt my brother would play even a second game with me after getting flamed like that? xD
: https://i.imgur.com/1MUsyKc.png So you totaly never wrote that ?
I said I had 3 perma bans didnt say this was my 3rd perma ban, can you learn how to interpret a text?
: can you show me where are my insults? (apart from the ones i called him sad at the very start... if you can call that an insult)
you really don't get it do you? If i called you intellectually impaired would it be less of an insult than dumbass? Just because it doesn't sound as bad doesn't mean it isn't as bad. I'm not saying I'm an expert in the field but I sure know more about what I'm saying than you do. You just keep talking out of your a$$. And if you can still play the game, why do you spend so much time in the forums? No social life is it?
: If the ban is the result of an history of bad behaviour, but was triggered by this particular game, i dont see how it can be ridiculous to take the whole history of flamming into account. Anyway OP said it was his 3rd perma ban, I think it says it all.
i love when people who can't read try to comment. It's not my 3rd perman ban, it's a 14 day ban. The ban was based on a false positive and only on that game. This is an update to another thread. They just searched my history of games after they saw I had been banned by a false positive and found games to maintain the ban. Games where I'm talking to my own brother. If you didn't read the whole post don't bother making stupid comments.
Aezander (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FodamseBronzes,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2fUqddgp,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-07T22:54:04.224+0000) > > Ok you have a good point and I don't expect a full ban lift at this point but do you think I deserve a 14 day ban given these 3 things: > > 1- The ban was triggered by a false positive > 2- 4 of the games they used I flamed my own brother > 3-The only legit flaming situation was in October/November > > In my opinion given all these circumstances I deserve a chat restriction but it's not up to me Have you had any Chat Restrictions prior this 14-day ban ?
No, not at all. This is the first suspension in this account
: i know and i watched those videos many times but i'm still one big ass noob in farming. when i'm alone under the turret i can last hit them but when my minions show up they just make it harder because they hit all the minions together not just one minion
I'm not a great player myself but it seems like you're getting bullied in lane. Yasuos are pretty annoying to fight against and losing some farm sometimes is better than losing your life. Using abilities to secure minions that you think will get last hit by the turret is also an option it's just about the timing
Lsayu (EUNE)
: >They said that because of the games that I had flamed they considered the penalty well applied even though it was triggered by a false positive. Why does everyone here act like they know it all? That's exactly what I said. Calm down.
No mate, you said the false positive triggered an inquiry that led to my ban which is not true, I got banned by an automated system with no inquiry. That happened after I made a ticket and they still got it all wrong. I can talk to my brother as I feel like and if it doesn't bother him who is Riot to say I can't talk to him that way? My dad? My mom? Only one of the games was legit flaming and getting banned for one game from months ago is stupid, makes no sense. They just found a way of justifying a ban that was wrong when they should either reduce it or lift it
: the thing is my adc had less than 200 cs but still got S and i think it was S+. about the last hit thing it's actually hard to farm when you are against Yasuo and when under tower my creeps won't let me last hit. the early game is hard to farm in but late game is easy but i'm not the only one farming the lane i have at least 2 with me farming.
why don't you just listen to my advice? I told you go watch videos on how to last hit. They will all teach how to farm under turret with both AD and AP champions. Usually AP ranged champions will have reduced auto attack damage which makes it harder to farm under turret. For high base attack champions the sequence in early game is: Melee minions: Turret-Turret-Auto Casters/Ranged minions: Auto-Turret-Auto For AP champiosn with low base attack stats (such as velkoz and most AP mid laners) the only difference is for melee minions which is Auto-Turret-Turret-Auto I'm not 100% sure about this so, again, I advise you to watch videos about last hitting. They are very simple and useful.
Lsayu (EUNE)
: They didn't take into account the false positive. It only triggered an inquiry and then they discovered those past toxic games. They banned you because of those. Not counting false positive.
Excuse me? Are you acting like you know more about my situation than I do? I read the reply from the Rioter and I know very well what it said. They analysed my case in detail after I made a ticket not when I got banned by the automated system. The automated system did what I had to do, it caught very offensive words and issued a penalty. After I complained they realized it was a mistake and reviewed my case and found a history of flaming my own brother in my own language. They said that because of the games that I had flamed they considered the penalty well applied even though it was triggered by a false positive. Why does everyone here act like they know it all?
Coxis (EUNE)
: I'm just gonna leave this here: [link](https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/credulous)
and why would I be lying? I already made a ticket lying here wouldnt change anything. I'm just exposing the way Riot deals with things. Maybe you don't like that but that's not my problem
: Why is it so hard to get S?
104 CS in 34 minutes is very low, you would need at least 200 cs for the S if not more. You dont usually get S ranks with average CS per minute bellow 6 which makes 34*6 = 204 CS. My advice is check videos on last hitting and mid/late game farming. Just because you're mid lane doesn't mean you can't farm jungle camps.
dukynho (EUNE)
: Thanks for replying, first off. I'm sorry for my writing style, it's clearly bad in the post as I was kinda pissed/tilted while I was writing it. As for the game itself as I said I never had a game this bad on the champion, even in my early days of playing it as my early days of playing were in lower elo, now I'm much higher elo compared to that. Not the highest I ever was but whatever, it's preseason and I'm playing other stuff too so it's normal that I fall off a bit when I'm not tryharding. On the other hand I've had plenty of people like that guy in my games even at my highest point of elo playing on this account, boosted d5's and stuff, who CLEARLY inted, and yes I mean inted, I know the difference very well as they were literally running it down mid compared to what I did in my game. It's pissing me off that there's still no system that can work on banning people like that, I mean technically there is one but it's clearly not working as intended. And the false positive bans are happening too often lately, or for example people who flame once (or say a bad word once or something out of context for example) get banned permanently compared to the trolls/inters. I know it's clearly a part of the game cuz the player base is too large for its own good in a way, but I still want people who troll and stuff to be perma banned rather than the ones who say something bad. The flamers can be muted, the trollers can't. I was one of the flamers before, I'm glad that has changed tho, at least I'm glad it changed in time. :)
i see you read my post hahah I got banned for a false positive and they used previous games to maintain the ban, games that hadn't banned me. But back to your post, even I, a person who used to flame know that muting is the best option. Don't bother explaining anything to people who are flaming you they will eventually stfu when they see they can actually get back in the game and win. Maybe not the case for that game but you know what I mean. And yes you are very right about the inting/trolling ban system. It just doesn't work and it's a complete lie. You're better off trying to make those trolls flame you and report them for flaming than for inting. How can a system tell the difference between a 0 10 score in a game like you had and a 0 10 from a troll? If it tried to see if the player fought or not the could just auto a few times miss skillshots and get around it. And how do you distinguish lack of skill from inting? I played bronze 5 games and people there will just AFK auto turrets and die, tanks will fight in the same spot until one falls. Both these things could be seen as inting in high elo but not in bronze 5. The option to report for inting is a lie.
Lsayu (EUNE)
: >There is zero reason for him to ever repeat what was said, report calling is absolutely worthless aswell as being reportable and bannable in itself But in itself it's not worth a punishment of 14 days[. Here is an update of what support responded. ](https://boards.eune.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behaviour-en/2fUqddgp-update-on-my-unfair-14-day-ban)It seems he had some history with toxic behavior a long time ago and that's why he was suspended. Support said it was a false positive chatlog. So, it's not bannable after all.
That is incorrect. I got banned because of the false positive. They just used previous games where I had flamed my brother to maintain the suspensio but I appealed again. It's stupid that bans can be retroactive. Basically what I mean is, you say "%%%%%% %%%got" and no one reports you and you get away and then a year later they ban you because you said %%%%%% %%%got a year ago and they dont want to lift their wrongful ban
: you shouldn't talk about logical falacies as long as your post is proof that you don't understand what logic is in the first place good day sir!
Hahahaha you're so stupid, you talk like everything you've been saying so far is the undeniable truth. It's just your opinion. Teens are so obnoxious. PS: I studied logic in university and you come here acting like you know something LOL
Lsayu (EUNE)
: Does the false positive not count then? Is it erased from the toxic record?
nope that's why this is total bullshit, I keep my bad record and a 14 day ban. I replied to the ticket but I wating for a reply
Krubaver (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FodamseBronzes,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kt0F5pja,comment-id=00010000000100000000,timestamp=2018-01-08T01:36:36.807+0000) > > ok the first article has little to no relation to league of legends in my opinion. You dont see the relation between an editor of online, multiplayer games, making money out of in-game purchases, and another editor of online, multiplayer games, making money out of in-game purchases? > Now runes are free and the only available thing to buy with real money only are skins. They give players no edge in the game. nobody made that point, it's not the issue. What we're saying is, frustration keeps people addicted, and addicted people buy. >What activision makes is different. I don't know exactly what kind of in game content they refer to but it's probably gameplay influencing like a premium overpowered gun or perk, you get it? That patent wasnt made for a specific game, it's a system. They were trying to find a way to pair people together, to motivate them to buy stuff. "Omg that guy wins so hard with this super sword, I want the same". And this works exactly the same in lol. Dont remember when you started the game, level 3, and you saw that guy rekting the bots with his super cool yasuo level 15 with flash? "omg he's winning because he has an expensive champ and flash, I want the same" ---> boom, you buy rps for an experience pack and champs. If interplay was wokring on this, 3 years ago, it would only be logical that riot did the same. >That second article may have some truth to it but the first I dont see how it can relate to LoL You're thinking about specific details, this is about the game experience, how the game makes you feel overall. Have you ever won tons of games in a row? Dont you feel you had enough, you're bored? Then you'll just close the game and move on to something else. But if you keep losing, you might just try again and again, in hope you'll win next time. It's just like the casino.
i actually quit when i start losing too much lol that's how you dont drop leagues and I dont spend money on games anymore and I hate yasuo but I get where you're coming from. You're making it sound more simple than it is though
Krubaver (EUW)
: I mean, it's not like Game design ressources for pros would promote frustrating players, right? Right? https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/293508/How_intentionally_frustrating_players_can_lead_to_better_game_design.php
ok the first article has little to no relation to league of legends in my opinion. Now runes are free and the only available thing to buy with real money only are skins. They give players no edge in the game. What activision makes is different. I don't know exactly what kind of in game content they refer to but it's probably gameplay influencing like a premium overpowered gun or perk, you get it? Skins have no impact on gampeplay in League. Sure, some people might want skins to look like their favorite streamer but that has little to do with matchmaking. As for the second article I really can't say it isn't something Riot does. For example by adding annoying champs like Teemo they might be making people want to destroy every Teemo they see. I just played a game against a Teemo an hour ago and I camped him. I was an evelynn and teemo is an easy target for eve when in top lane and he was playing vs a shen (teemo counters shen really hard by outpushing him and denying under turret farm and any engages with Q) but my hate for teemo made me want to tilt him. He went 2-7-2 and we won easy because both me and shen were fed but I know that even though it was the right thing to do to win my hate for teemos just enticed me to do it. That second article may have some truth to it but the first I dont see how it can relate to LoL
Fajerk (EUW)
: Are you implying Riot employees cannot play the game?
no, not at all. But I doubt those "unmarked" accounts would be out posting random stuff like achieving silver playing AP trynd mid lane xD
: >https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/97/Faulty-Comparison that's not what this is but nice try
You came back for more? Thought you were in your cave already. Believe what you want to believe. These are 2 completely different realities and if you even bothered reading the article I sent you'd see the comparison made between brocolli and chocolate bars is more legitimate than this stupid thing you wrote about police and shoplifting. I won't go on about logical fallacies with someone who clearly knows nothing about the issue
: PORTUGAL CARALHO !!! Ás vezes a Riot é assim... btw o teu nome é abusado xD
: Geez, just suck it up for now. They've found a way to maintain the ban and it sucks, but hey ho nothing is perfect. Jf you take the passion you've put into this into the real world outside you'd get real far man. No, really! I'm not being sarcastic or jokey, you'd get far!
like being a lawyer because I find loopholes in "laws"/rules? ahahah
Fajerk (EUW)
: I never defended toxic players. And saying that toxicty creates more toxicity is proven scientific fact, even Riot acknowledged that. But discussing toxicity was never point, the point is how rigged matchmaking is used to make profit.
hey man what you're saying about him is not true xD he has a thread here about climbing to silver playing AP tryndamere xD its not a random unmarked acc
: > [{quoted}](name=FodamseBronzes,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Txmu7fWA,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-01-07T22:56:40.518+0000) > > Fair enough, it's just that those builds probably require very precise play style and any mistake can throw you to a defeat and you have 4 other people in your team. But if you win thats all that matters. Do what you do Any player of this game can everyday see other players fail horribly while they play the most possible meta champs with the most possible meta builds, which kinda suggest me that i will have to wait a long time before i feel that some game may have been lost truly and only because i was playing off meta.
hahah you have very good points there. I do go for meta builds although I have played a few off meta builds but only for fun in normals. I like mordekaiser adc for example xD works with blitz/thresh/nautilus better though
Fajerk (EUW)
: First, you cannot trust 3rd party sites in term of MMR, it's made up by them. Riot does not provide it. Second, Riot matchmaking is quite broken. Better said, it works as intended, it's just that Riot wants it to do stupid things. This game does not have fair matchmaking since it makes it more profitable. Getting bad experience is not by an accident. Maybe you will feel so bad that you gonna buy a skin to feel better right? Or you get tilted and start flaming ppl so they can ban your account, which means you will make a new one and buy same skins you already got once. Works like a charm.
holy shit haahah that's some tinfoil hat stuff there but makes sense, I dont buy shit from them maybe that's why I have 3 perma bans in less than one year LOL
: > [{quoted}](name=FodamseBronzes,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Txmu7fWA,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-01-07T22:40:00.405+0000) > > Why do you force yourself to play non meta picks? If you can climb playing that weird (and less effective) suff imagine if you were sticking to the meta (more effective) picks/builds? You could be even higher than silver Because being convinced that you must play what you are told is "more effective" or feel at disadvantage is for me a way worse limitation and i refuse to abide to it.
Fair enough, it's just that those builds probably require very precise play style and any mistake can throw you to a defeat and you have 4 other people in your team. But if you win thats all that matters. Do what you do
: I totally agree that the ban was unfair, but this is where you will ultimately come undone at some point. Riot have EVERY right to decide what yo can and can't say. It's their game, their servers, their little chat box you are typing in. They make the rules and have EVERY right to enforce them as they see fit. Trying to decide which rules do and don't apply to you because yo think you have a loophole won't work. Hence, you are banned. The bannable toxic language doesn't become less so "because it's your brother". They don't know, or care that it's your brother. They have a rule banning that language between players. You are both players. Don't do dumb shit on a moderated system. You want to flame, shout and swear at each other, set up a discord for the pair of you. So yes, THAT ban was unfair, but your attitude towards what you have the "right" to say needs to change. A quick summary; You cannot flame "because it's your brother/mate/cousin" You cannot flame "because you meant it as a joke" You cannot flame "because someone else flamed first" You cannot flame "because someone died alot and you think they are 'inting'" You cannot flame "because someone's straight up trolling the game" You cannot flame "because someone took your farm" You cannot flame "because someone took your lane" These same "reasons" come up all the time on here when people get banned, and they all think they somehow have the "right", that it's ok to flame so long as "reasons". You don't.
Ok you have a good point and I don't expect a full ban lift at this point but do you think I deserve a 14 day ban given these 3 things: 1- The ban was triggered by a false positive 2- 4 of the games they used I flamed my own brother 3-The only legit flaming situation was in October/November In my opinion given all these circumstances I deserve a chat restriction but it's not up to me
: well given that the account you're crying about is level 29 (btw 2 week ban at level 29. way to go!) and the one ure using to comment stopped being played on at the end of november it's likely that this one is banned. can you play an ai game on it really quick to counter this assumption?
no, im on my way to a game with an account called badzombiemovie
: Feels good
Why do you force yourself to play non meta picks? If you can climb playing that weird (and less effective) suff imagine if you were sticking to the meta (more effective) picks/builds? You could be even higher than silver
LazySlav (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Potchikir,realm=EUW,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=I1ynrIho,comment-id=0004000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-07T21:35:58.515+0000) > > U know girls can %%%% guys I don't know. And now when i do, i am kinda scared.
: had that been true, you wouldn't be so salty over 1 of them getting banned nice try!
just read the name of the account that got banned and the name of this one... you really are illogical and try to sound smart when you're just a jackass lol
: unlike you i can still play it {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
I got more accounts don't worry about me
: whatever you say. it's obvious you'd rather cling to irrelevant points rather than stay on topic and defend your faulty position we're done here!
hahaha like I said, crawl back. Or since you like League emotes and stuff, flash away. {{summoner:4}}
: >You're a damn hypocrite, you come here and label me as a sad person the get all worked up because I called you a dumbass. nothing inteligent to say at all... sad...sad... > It won't be you, it won't Riot or anyone else but my brother who will decide how I can talk to him. He didn't get offended by anything of what I said and it's you who is going to get offended? just because you and your bro find slurs funny, it doesn't mean that people who are not you two have to find them funny too. next time use skype or something! >Funny how you say they can speak more than English but the guy who answered my ticket was spanish and DOESNT SPEAK PORTUGUESE. what's your point? you're still thinking of loopholes to get away with using slurs in another language > And yeah I said I flamed 3 months ago in one game and you are here to tell me I deserve a 14 day ban for it? the day the punished gets to choose his punishment is the day punishments become meaningless {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}} >Who the hell are you by the way? not relevant to say
I like your answer to my question about who the hell you are. You're definitely not relevant. It's funny how you keep calling me sad and insist that calling people names is what people do when they have nothing intelligent to say. So you can call me sad but I can't call you a hypocrite and a dumbass? That's the definition of hypocrisy little teenager.
: Tbh at the very least you should've been punished for the chatlog where you admit you flamed someone. But that punishment should have happened 3 months ago and not due to riot trying to justify their f@#$ up.
I know that, I wouldnt mind a chat ban because it is the only game where I flamed someone who I don't know from anywhere. Riot has no right to decide how friends/family communicate between eachother but some people don't seem to grasp that. For the game I flamed that janna I deserve a chat restriction since it was just one game
: >They banned me because of a false positive as they admited but then instead of lifting it they go on to check my history of games to find a reason to maintain it? Like wtf is that? it's like you got arrested by accident and then complain that the cops still send you to jail because of a shoplift you pulled off 2 months ago but didn't get caught for at the time "Like wtf is that?" {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}}
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/97/Faulty-Comparison crawl back to your cave you dumb 16 year old troll PS: I love the face palm the statue is doing. It perfectly suits the moment.
: >the only legit flame was one game and they maintained a 14 day ban. so you admit that you flamed but still complain that a punishment exists in response for it. nice! >They used 3 where I was talking to my brother in Portuguese and used some slur abreviations that you wouldnt have a clue what they meant unless you could speak Portuguese the other one I was flaming myself. let me tell you a secret: riot can speak more than english :) it doesn't matter what language you use to flame, it's still illegal and they will still pick it up. stop looking for loopholes to "game the system" because you're gonna have a bad time! > You're the same dumbass that posted the same stupid video twice on my other threads and you come here to call me sad because I stand for what I believe in? Check yourself. you know who uses insults in replies? people with nothing inteligent to say quite sad
You're a damn hypocrite, you come here and label me as a sad person then get all worked up because I called you a dumbass. You just keep proving my point with every dumb comment you write. It won't be you, it won't be Riot or anyone else but my brother who will decide how I can talk to him. He didn't get offended by anything of what I said and it's you who is going to get offended? Funny how you say they can speak more than English but the guy who answered my ticket was spanish and DOESNT SPEAK PORTUGUESE. And yeah I said I flamed 3 months ago in one game and you are here to tell me I deserve a 14 day ban for it? Who the hell are you by the way?
: If is true that's pathetic. If a ban is the result of a "false positive" and Riot itself admit it, is plain absurd to then proceed to browse the entire history of the guy to find a reason to ban him anyway. IF the system is so good like Riot said he will get banned soon anyway if he truly deserve it: but when the system %%%% up and Riot admit it there is only ONE right thing to do: unban, period.
I posted the link to a picture of where they admit it and a link to the translation
LazySlav (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=FodamseBronzes,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2fUqddgp,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-01-07T19:59:55.669+0000) > > Hope my portuguese didn't offend you sir! OMG HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT TO ME!! !This is outrages !!! Reporteddddd
: >They admit it was a false positive BUT they went searching for toxic messages that i wrote just to maintain the ban. They went as far as october or november to find the only legit flaming so your issue with them is that they falsely accused you of that one time you broke the rules when actually you didnt and then proceded to find another time you broke the rules to keep the ban legit you're a sad...sad man
the only legit flame was one game and they maintained a 14 day ban. What about their escalation proccess? They used 3 where I was talking to my brother in Portuguese and used some slur abreviations that you wouldnt have a clue what they meant unless you could speak Portuguese the other one I was flaming myself. You're the same dumbass that posted the same stupid video twice on my other threads and you come here to call me sad because I stand for what I believe in? Check yourself.
: EUW > NA discord
I got to try this, I hope there are high elo players ready to shit on me
: If is true that's pathetic. If a ban is the result of a "false positive" and Riot itself admit it, is plain absurd to then proceed to browse the entire history of the guy to find a reason to ban him anyway. IF the system is so good like Riot said he will get banned soon anyway if he truly deserve it: but when the system %%%% up and Riot admit it there is only ONE right thing to do: unban, period.
it is truly ridiculous and the worst part is 4 out of the 5 games they used to justify it were games I was talking in portuguese and in 3 of those 4 I was talking to my brother. Who is riot to say how I can talk with him? Also, as I said above, probably the only word the Spanish guy who handled my ticket could understand was "merda" which sounds the same as the spanish word for sh1t. Most of it were abreviations of slang words that litreally almost no one can understand in League. The 4th game in Portuguese I was flaming myself
LazySlav (EUNE)
: Sir Teemo Sir Zoe ...
: Foste um pouco harsh com o pessoal bronze.
hahaha esta conta já foi banida há meses XD já não dou flame e podes ler o que escrevi ao meu irmao, esses porras agora querem dizer como posso falar com ele lol
: That would explain 1 player with low mmr (since his premade was high mmr) but that wasn't the case either. I checked and Xayah and Janna were premades (Janna doesn't even have a rank) and Xayah's MMR is 1,590 which is Gold 3. Jax and Xerath weren't premade and they still had low MMR.
I don't know exactly how Riot's MM system uses MMR but when you are unranked your MMR is around gold 5 I think. I remember my first ranked games I played with golds and I was not premade with anyone. I think maybe you start with +/-1300 MMR at ranked and since Janna and Xayah were premade maybe their combined MMR was of around 1600 maybe even more because it goes up when you are premade. This is the only explanation I can find PS: I checked their ranked WR. Both jax and Xerath have a 67% ranked win rate which kind of explains why they are there. Riot is trying to make them lose (geting their WR closer to 50%) by placing them in higher elo games
LazySlav (EUNE)
: Moral of story: Riot is right, even when they are wrong... Sad day...
Hope my portuguese didn't offend you sir!
Show more

FodamseBronzes

Level 34 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion