: Not sure you can do that. You'll have to manually mute players (or pings, emotes...) in your games.
I just saw this on Midbeasts stream. Just /fullmute and you get rid of pings as well. This will be my saving grace.
: > [{quoted}](name=Foulvilecreature,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=krFGgIMp,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2017-12-01T02:45:05.310+0000) > > Are you a an undercover rioter or just a wannabe? I am one of those weird, fascinating creatures you might have heard of known as, "a person I disagree with". You might have heard of this particular species. I don't blame you for being cautious about interacting with them. > And context matters in every other aspect of guilt, everywhere else in the world. Just not in %%%%%% Riot land. Either that or having a reason to flame doesn't mean you didn't flame. How many more times am I going to have to explain this before you stop blaming everyone other than yourself? > You have no concept of logic, context, justice Prooooojection... > and i grow even more certain that you`re just a simple troll judging normal human reactions from your %%%%ing ivory tower. Well, assuming that I _am_ a troll and not just someone you disagreed with that you can only think to hurl insults at in the absence of an actual sound rebuttal, what does it say about you that you're effectively feeding me by coming off as more bitter, angry and juvenile? Congratulations, you outed yourself as easy trollbait faster than your chatlog did, and your percent sign-laden tirades are really dispelling doubt after doubt as to whether or not you're the kind of person pleasant enough to be undeserving of a ban. I again stand by my earlier point. You aren't disproving anything.
First of all, i am in no way projecting anything towards you. I stated my observations, and judging by your reply, i seem to have hit the nail on the head. Secondly, i in no way shy away from discussions just because someone disagrees with me. If i did, then there would be no discussions, would there? You strike me as someone whose disagreeing with someone just to be a flat out %%%%. Either that or you`re simply that much of a rule enforcer. You`re probably swell at parties, i imagine. And lastly, before i leave you, context always matters. In every situation in every aspect of life. Always. You can adhere to Riot`s dictatorship, but if you cannot see how flawed this system is, then go with God. This pissing contest is over, from my part. Best of luck in all your endeavours.
: There is no harm, it's just how the system is, suck it up. I got a suspension from "flaming" a premade mate that I know for some time. It's just better to not use the chat at all.
This, by default, means that the system is completely messed up.
: > [{quoted}](name=Foulvilecreature,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=krFGgIMp,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2017-12-01T02:45:58.240+0000) > > This has no validity here. EUNE post. The two boards are intertwined lol and you can even use an EU acc. to go post on the NA boards. Are you stupid by chance? Or are you suggesting EUNE is more civilized/ EUW is more savage by default?
Interesting that someone with such poor english asks me if i`m stupid. It was a meme, relax. Also his narrative had nothing to do with my case, which is why i somewhat ridiculed it. How you got to "EUNE more civilized/EUW = savage", well that`s something only you can answer. I certainly didn`t lead you down that path.
: > [{quoted}](name=Foulvilecreature,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=krFGgIMp,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2017-12-01T00:02:06.523+0000) > > So basically i should just take it up the ass, whilst smiling and offering to lube myself up? You mute, ignore and report. You do not retaliate and end up making a bad situation worse. Guess which option _you_ went for? > People harass me for absolutely no reason other than they are worse than their opponents during the lane phase, i have a mild response, and this is what happens? This mild response...plus the entire history of "mild responses" that led up to this punishment which indicated to Riot that telling you not to respond this way did not get through to you. > My negativity isn`t directed towards anybody Now, looking back at those chatlogs, that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call a "lie". > it`s more of a generalistic attitude that occurs due to the fact that i`ve been heavily abused up until this point. "They started it" is an excuse you were supposed to have grown out of after primary school. Don't try to dress it up with smart-sounding rhetoric, it's not convincing me. > That doesn`t matter at all, is that the way it should work? Certainly doesn`t work like that in any other aspect of anything. You my friend seem completely ignorant to the concept of context. Because context does not matter - all the context would show is _why_ you flamed. Like I've already said, knowing why you flamed doesn't change the fact that you still flamed. And flaming is something that nobody in this game would want, regardless of the motivation. People outside of your little chat window slapfight aren't going to see a flamer and a victim - they'll just see an escalating situation between flamers, and that's why context does not matter. I repeat - _context does not matter_. You tried to fight punishable behaviour with punishable behaviour and got caught, and that's why your punishment is justified. I stand by my earlier point.
Are you a an undercover rioter or just a wannabe? I _did_ not flame. And context matters in every other aspect of guilt, everywhere else in the world. Just not in %%%%%% Riot land. You have no concept of logic, context, justice and i grow even more certain that you`re just a simple troll judging normal human reactions from your %%%%ing ivory tower. There`s a reason the justice system has the term extenuating circumstances closely nit into it.
Smerk (EUW)
: Was there only one game?
In the report card, yes. I`ve had chat restrictions recently.
Cypherous (EUW)
: Well a valid report will carry a minimum amount of weight in regards to pushing you towards the threshold of a ban, the occasional outburst or salt won't get you banned, i mean i've never even had a chat restriction and i've gone full ham and sworn at players before, its fairly easy to avoid bans if you just read what you type before you say it Secondly the parts that are seen as negative are you telling them you're going to mute them and calling them annoying, yes its fairly tame by the average report standards but enough of those reports will raise a flag
So me telling other people that are toxic towards me - unprovoked might i add, raises a f ag? Duly noted. It`s like a cop reminding you that you`ve broken the law before he writes you a ticket.
: > [{quoted}](name=Foulvilecreature,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=krFGgIMp,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-11-30T23:42:49.195+0000) > > I can own up to it beeing a lot of chatter, and some of it might even be slightly insulting and negative - but two week suspension? From the one game alone? Atleast that`s what it shows in my client, there might be other games that for some reason aren`t shown in the report card. That's the most likely explanation, especially if you've received a form of punishment before in the form of the chat restrictions. In any case, you're not supposed to be "slightly" insulting and negative, you're supposed to not embody that attitude at all. And sorry to say, but your chatlog, while too mild to really be "worst of the worst", doesn't exactly come off as pleasant, given how you treat your teammates. > It`s also a point to make that every one of these sentences are made in response to direct attacks by three other players on my team. Good for you, but having a reason to come off as unpleasant to your teammates doesn't mean you didn't come off as unpleasant to your teammates. All you ultimately did was add to a bad situation. This defense means nothing, and I am not convinced that this suspension is undeserved.
I would like for you to point out to me where the harm is here. Since you seem unfamiliar to the concept of context, just ignore it. Based purely on its own premise, which comments do you consider toxic?
Cypherous (EUW)
: Well a negative attitude report will have been valid as you were negative so this ban is likely just from your account earning too many valid reports and this just happened to be the report which pushed you over the edge
While i know that is what happened, it just takes too little to push someone over the edge. It basically means you cannot chat unless you`re beeing undisputably positive for 100% of every single word you ever say.
: > [{quoted}](name=Foulvilecreature,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=krFGgIMp,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-11-30T23:42:49.195+0000) > > I can own up to it beeing a lot of chatter, and some of it might even be slightly insulting and negative - but two week suspension? From the one game alone? Atleast that`s what it shows in my client, there might be other games that for some reason aren`t shown in the report card. That's the most likely explanation, especially if you've received a form of punishment before in the form of the chat restrictions. In any case, you're not supposed to be "slightly" insulting and negative, you're supposed to not embody that attitude at all. And sorry to say, but your chatlog, while too mild to really be "worst of the worst", doesn't exactly come off as pleasant, given how you treat your teammates. > It`s also a point to make that every one of these sentences are made in response to direct attacks by three other players on my team. Good for you, but having a reason to come off as unpleasant to your teammates doesn't mean you didn't come off as unpleasant to your teammates. All you ultimately did was add to a bad situation. This defense means nothing, and I am not convinced that this suspension is undeserved.
So basically i should just take it up the ass, whilst smiling and offering to lube myself up? People harass me for absolutely no reason other than they are worse than their opponents during the lane phase, i have a mild response, and this is what happens? My negativity isn`t directed towards anybody, it`s more of a generalistic attitude that occurs due to the fact that i`ve been heavily abused up until this point. That doesn`t matter at all, is that the way it should work? Certainly doesn`t work like that in any other aspect of anything. You my friend seem completely ignorant to the concept of context.
: Just do what I do too. (I was 2x perma banned because of same thing as person above me described). Now I got new account on where I do not say almost anything except few commands. But best way to do is just report each and single game 9x people for litteraly anything, (best hate speech,int,verbal abuse - mostly perma ban for it) Report them from top to bottom even when they say gg but game was 4v5 or something like it :) They want to make community like this ? They will get it :) REPORTS Everywhere :)
I can adhere to this. Muting all and reporting everyone from now on.
: when someone is toxic u either mute them or ignore them and stop replying to them u want a tip to not get banned again,STOP DEFENDING YOURSELF its useless if someone says he will report u nothing will happen if u are innocent if u keep replying again and again u are risking to become truly toxic other people's action dont matter only u matter in your case stop chatting unless its to make a strategy for the game or sth dont call anyone noob or troll or to tell them to die irl or sth.REFORM!
So if someone is toxic towards you, you are not allowed to a) say that they`re toxic or b) defend yourself - even in the nicest, most on point fashion. You basically have to bend over, take it up the ass and wait until they behave like that for atleast 2-3-4 more games. And to you that seems fair? If you arent allowed to chat, then why have a %%%%ing chat function in the game at all?
Cypherous (EUW)
: Hardly injustice, loads of places use the same system, you commit enough offences and you will get punished for it, it shows your disregard for the rules, its on top of multiple previous instances of toxicity
"Rules". A set of rules that are made by fairies. How about instead of banning stuff like this, you instantly permaban the ones that use hard racial slurs, violence slurs and wishing of various deceases slurs upon other people? Or calling other people %%%%ing %%%%%%s? These people get the same amount of punishment and chances at bettering their behaviour as someone who proclaims other peoples toxicity. Thats a fact, i`ve seen it happen multiple times. But hey. Let`s encourage that kind of behaviour, as long as you don`t do it again. A lot.
Hansiman (EUNE)
: > But this is my most toxic moment, and someone like this deserves a PERMABAN? You were warned in the past for your behaviour, no? Since multiple warnings haven't made you change your behaviour, what option does Riot have left?
Develop a ban system that doesn`t treat people like children? Apparently the only thing you`re allowed to say in this game, is kind words - but not too much of that either before it turns into spam and that makes you a negative influence! Doesn`t it bother any of you that Riot is the only company to enfore such ridicolous ban rules, yet you can still play on other accounts? So basically you can get a new chance, as long as you fund us by purchasing RP. Start punishing inters, trolls and the really hard flamers. Competetive people saying things that are close to the line shouldn`t equate to punishment. In fact, the fact that Riot enforces such a strict and imo ridicolous set of chat rules only makes the community more toxic. It`s dumb and a good business strategy since Riot knows most people will make a new account and put RP into it since they just lost an account that had champs and skins on it - and they want to speed up things.
Rioter Comments

Foulvilecreature

Level 36 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion