Triptaminka (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=GonahtanuGepardi,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=ri7BbdjZ,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-07-21T02:55:09.930+0000) > > They removed the flash taunt combo because it was the difference between pros and soloq. Like what? I don't know anyone who couldn't use that combo. Literally an idiotic move to remove it. Dude he wasnt played in pro for like 5 pathes. if you didnt notice you have now other sups played. Thats why so many ppl asking why did thye nerf him now, whats the point
Your information isn't exactly correct. During this summer split, galio has been picked 16 times in lck, 3 times in lcs and 22 times in lpl. He has definitely had presence during the last few patches. Personally i didn't even think he has been a good pick after they removed the damage reduction from his ult but apparently riot is tired of seeing him.
: > but. but. but. you have just said that a player in bronze can't have knowledge about the game and now you have just said that you wouldn't judge someones game knowledge after re-reading i know get what you mean and i was totally wrong, ignore this
I can respect that.
: > [{quoted}](name=GonahtanuGepardi,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=A86am1xE,comment-id=00040001000100000000,timestamp=2019-07-21T14:48:51.585+0000) > > The player wouldn't be bronze if any of those were true. That's kinda the issue. not necessarily. this is sort of grouping bronze players and saying that they must all not know much about balance or anything about the game, and myself being bronze (I'm still doing my first ever placements but still bronze) i have played with many bronze players who've shown amazing knowledge about their champion and many game mechanics (they may have been smurfs although) > I always look at the argument before the rank. Always. I'm never gonna say someone is wrong because of their rank. but. but. but. you have just said that a player in bronze can't have knowledge about the game and now you have just said that you wouldn't judge someones game knowledge
> i have played with many bronze players who've shown amazing knowledge about their champion and many game mechanics (they may have been smurfs although) They could have been smurfs or it could just be your personal opinion of them. As an example, back when i started in season 1, i thought gold players were very good with good mechanics and game knowledge when i was just below the bar of reaching gold. Were they actually good? Definitely not. The gold players back then were around the skill level of current low silver or even bronze. So I had the impression that people were playing well just because i was worse than them, when in reality, they were playing well at all. It's an illusion. Just like you are saying you have seen good players there. It could very well be that you are considering them good because they are playing well in comparison but they most likely aren't good. Maybe you just lacked the game knowledge to see the flaws in that person's gameplay? That's a reasonable argument to make at least. I leveled up a smurf this season and played from iron to gold with it. I didn't see a single even remotely good player during that climb and even the "smurfs" that i encountered were like gold players at best on their mains.
: > You only need to learn the very basics to get to the level of platinum. no. absolutely not. by using your logic i just need to know how to take down towers to become plat? just no
I said basics. It's a plural. Meaning multiple basic skills. That means just learning to take down towers is not enough. Don't call your logic my logic.
: > This is not true. A silver player is no wrong because he is silver. He is silver because he doesn't have the game knowledge to get any further which also means he doesn't have the game knowledge to argue about balance. His rank is the result of his skill and game knowledge. So he doesn't lack knowledge because he is silver, he is silver because he lacks knowledge. a silver player is silver because they are normally against harder opponents because that's how riots ranked system works, not because they lack game knowledge. i have no idea where u have gotten that into your head > As i said in another comment, there is a difference between an obvious case of champion being overpowered and a case where a low elo player just claims something to be overpowered. If a case is obvious, it doesn't mean the low elo player understands why the champion is overpowered. Irelia and akali after reworks are good examples of obviously overpowered champions and it's not the low elo players who bring attention to these champions being overpowered. I don't know if i explained that point well but i hope you can understand it. they dont claim something to be overpowered, they have a personal opinion that something is overpowered. and the way you are saying this is almost as if u are saying that they are always wrong.
>a silver player is silver because they are normally against harder opponents because that's how riots ranked system works, not because they lack game knowledge. i have no idea where u have gotten that into your head {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} What harder opponents? They are playing against other silvers (or to be more precise, people with similar mmr). So in other words, they are against their equals, not harder opponents. They can't climb higher because their game knowledge isn't better than the player's above them. >they dont claim something to be overpowered, they have a personal opinion that something is overpowered. Aka claiming that something is overpowered... >and the way you are saying this is almost as if u are saying that they are always wrong. If you actually read what i said, you would know i never implied that.
: > The player wouldn't be bronze if any of those were true. That's kinda the issue. I was bronze bcs I had not enough time due to my exams! Exams that I needed to take to evaluate my 4 year's knowledge of certain school subjects so I could get enough points to get to decent college! I was silver cause I was student of history and etnology and cultural anthropology and I always had full desk of literature to read so I could barely play one or two games per week ( in times of exams, 2 ~ 3 months without playing any game)! I was once again silver cause I had one year training as typist at state attorneys office as typist which required me to learn bunch of laws and practices! I am unemployed atm and I am learning and creating programs and application as programmer! And I am just gold, since I could play 10 games only per week! If I am in-between projects and job interviews then that count falls to 0! Would I sometime give invalid argument? Illogical argument? Yep! Would I make mistakes? Yep! BUT I would learn from those comments and arguments and I would read more about said subjects ( since that is easier for me than playing game atm )! Would you still say I am bronze/silver/gold cause I lack knowledge of the game mechanics? No! I am bronze/silver/gold cause I lack time to hone those skills (whats worse is that I do play a lot of games so yeah! And I do spend a lot of time on boards ;) )! But I do love to argument a lot :D So is my ranked placement a evaluation of my knowledge of this game and its understanding ( or lack of it)?
>So is my ranked placement a evaluation of my knowledge of this game and its understanding ( or lack of it)? Combined with your total win rate, yes it is. You could have only 50 games played and you are in silver but if you have a 90% win rate, i'm not gonna treat you as a silver player. If you play that few games, you naturally don't improve as a player or you have improved by watching videos and reading about it and it will show in your win rate. You only need to learn the very basics to get to the level of platinum. That's not hard or something you really need to practice by playing a lot. It's extremely arrogant when people claim they are good enough to climb but just don't have the time and yet their win rates clearly show that they are not as good as they think they are. It's completely different to learn from a video that csing is important and then applying it to your gameplay from learning about a riven fast combo and applying it to your gameplay. The csing one is extremely easy to apply in practice and it alone is pretty much enough to get people to plat as it is the most important basic skill by far. Riven combo takes muscle memory and repetition which takes time. Learning how to cs doesn't take time, just focus. It's also a lot different from knowing what the basics are but not yet mastering them than to know how a certain champion actually works in certain scenarios. The latter one takes experience from an actual competitive level of play and low elo simply doesn't offer that experience. As a side note, you did have time to play more. You just chose not to. I'm not stupid enough to believe you spent all your time either sleeping or studying or working because you had to. You either chose to do it anyway or you did something else which took away the time you could have used for league. That excuse doesn't fly.
Yraco (EUW)
: I don't think it's necessarily fair when rank comes into a discussion on balancing. A silver player is not wrong about game balance just because they are silver so bringing their rank into it is irrelevant and shouldn't matter unless you're trying to suggest they have no understanding of the game because of their rank. Darius could very well be overpowered, with stats to prove it all the way from iron to challenger, and any player can recognise the fact, regardless of rank.
>I don't think it's necessarily fair when rank comes into a discussion on balancing. It is entirely fair though. There is a reason why there is a minimum rank requirement on being able to work on Riot's balance team. >A silver player is not wrong about game balance just because they are silver so bringing their rank into it is irrelevant and is purely there as an insult or justification of why they are wrong. This is not true. A silver player is no wrong because he is silver. He is silver because he doesn't have the game knowledge to get any further which also means he doesn't have the game knowledge to argue about balance. His rank is the result of his skill and game knowledge. So he doesn't lack knowledge because he is silver, he is silver because he lacks knowledge. >Darius could very well be overpowered, with stats to prove it all the way from iron to challenger, and any player can recognise the fact, regardless of rank. As i said in another comment, there is a difference between an obvious case of champion being overpowered and a case where a low elo player just claims something to be overpowered. If a case is obvious, it doesn't mean the low elo player understands why the champion is overpowered. Irelia and akali after reworks are good examples of obviously overpowered champions and it's not the low elo players who bring attention to these champions being overpowered. I don't know if i explained that point well but i hope you can understand it.
: But you are putting every low elo player in a group that is unable to test things out, calculate things out and see cause => event => consuequence ( mainly teenagers and actual kids XD )! I just want to point it out that there might be someone who actually knows what he is saying, can give pretty good arguments etc etc but is only bronze! Why is he bronze? Did he recently switch from another moba and needs time adjusting? Did he change genre of games and is unfamiliar with mobas? Does he have demanding job and he cant develop skills ingame and adavnce in ranked but is actually amazing in regards to his logical skills and reflexes? Just look at argument first and see if it is logical or if it has some kind of practical use before you look at his ranked placement :D Btw I am not trying to justify those players that go: 'OMFG! Delete ! She is op and I lsot to her!!!!'
>I just want to point it out that there might be someone who actually knows what he is saying, can give pretty good arguments etc etc but is only bronze! Why is he bronze? Did he recently switch from another moba and needs time adjusting? Did he change genre of games and is unfamiliar with mobas? Does he have demanding job and he cant develop skills ingame and adavnce in ranked but is actually amazing in regards to his logical skills and reflexes? The player wouldn't be bronze if any of those were true. That's kinda the issue. >Just look at argument first and see if it is logical or if it has some kind of practical use before you look at his ranked placement :D I always look at the argument before the rank. Always. I'm never gonna say someone is wrong because of their rank.
: Does that mean after nine years and minimum of 2k games ( just recent seasons only in gold ) my comment of Riot not understanding balancing this or that champion has no value? No matter the possible logic about it? I guess I should just shut my mouth then ;)
It's a bit more complicated than that. There are obvious cases like akali and irelia that were blatantly overpowered after their reworks so even a bronze player could call them overpowered on the forums and be right but their reasoning as to why they were overpowered might not be correct. Considering how many times champions like galio have been touched after the rework, it is pretty obvious, even for low tier players that Riot doesn't really know what to do with him. But cases where it's not completely obvious like in the ones above, they really shouldn't argue with people who are more experienced and have more knowledge of the subject. They can make a post etc, but they shouldn't argue like their opinion is correct. If a higher skill level player comes in and tells he is wrong, he shouldn't try to argue with him but ask why he is wrong and try to see it from a different view point since he doesn't have the knowledge to argue with the point.
Lari (EUNE)
: You might as well delete Galio
They removed the flash taunt combo because it was the difference between pros and soloq. Like what? I don't know anyone who couldn't use that combo. Literally an idiotic move to remove it.
: Rank Shaming in 2k19
There are people who say stuff like "lol 500 games and still plat" and they are annoying and it doesn't even work as an argument to anything. However, often times people think that they are being rank shamed when in reality they are not. As an example, a silver player complains that darius is overpowered. Then a high elo player (like a diamond player) tells them that he is not overpowered and that the silver player shouldn't concern himself with game balance because he doesn't have the necessary game knowledge and level of understanding about the game to make any statements related to game balance. The silver player often takes that as an insult and rank shaming (more often than not) when in reality, it's just a fact and entirely true. Not to mention it has nothing to do with rank shaming.
: hm...true...still, it would be a lot easier if Riot just told us how those things work. it's not like they would be exploitable :\
They have told us how they work though. All debuffs with the same name only use the strongest effect. This means it applies to stuns, snares, slows, silences etc etc. So basically everything. Only the strongest applies at a time. It's the same for grievous wounds.
: you know what we need? we need Riot to actually say these thing openly (or provide the correct data to the wiki) because the only other option i can see now is to make a custom game but that would be tedious because, even if we can rush kled's test, kata's needs bot level 6 AND morellonomicon so...yikes...
You really dont need that much. Just level 6 and ignite.
: i am pretty sure it does stack
: it doesn't say anywhere that it doesn't and i don't know how we could even see that
Only the strongest heal reduction is calculated. Just like it works with slows. Only the strongest effect applies.
Maxolini (EUW)
: Btw this patch 9.14 introduced so many performance problems !!
Xerath q. Try dodging that with a screen freeze. I guarantee you that people are knowingly abusing these freezes.
: A Call to Arms: The end of toxicity in the game.
No need to punish verbal toxicity at all unless it's a real life threat or racism etc. Mute exists to combat verbally toxic players. Or use the disable allied chat feature that was just added into the game this patch. That way you don't have to use /mute all at the start of every game.
graabbuu (EUW)
: Thata not what im asking and why the downvotes, are yall om crack or what¿???????
That' exactly what you are asking and i didn't down vote you.
graabbuu (EUW)
: Disable team chat
/mute all. That's literally the command that has existed for years and does the same thing. The only difference is that you can still type when you use /mute all but if that is your problem, then you shouldn't enable team chat at all.
PØØTIN (EUW)
: Are your promos also magical?
: Horrible Micro stuttering and fps lag latest patch
Yeah i also noticed that every time enemy xerath used q, the game would freeze for a very short time. It didn't matter where he used it. It was annoying af and sometimes made it impossible to dodge his q.
: Bugs are inevitable, just something that happens. Any change that happens has a chance to introduce a bug and it’s entirely luck based. Riot can’t be to blamed for the bugs appearing, what we can judge them on is how they handle the bugs.
Riot did fix the bugs pretty quickly though, gotta give them some credit.
: > [{quoted}](name=Šªcrificë,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=cWWcHm8E,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-07-17T18:22:13.713+0000) > > Shaco is all buggy and weak, needs a rework, they just dont care for him camille needs an update as well :P
She really doesn't. She is completely fine outside of the fact that she pretty much loses every lane but her kit kinda makes up for it after laning.
: DON'T PLAY RANKED RIGHT NOW!!!
explain in a bit more detail please.
: So we now have the option to always mute chat from allies. Does this remove the entire chatbox? So if i want to rage i cant because the chatbox wont be there? Or can we still chat even though we muted automatically all games? Sometimes i get so heated i cannot control myself and start to flame. The chatbox being not there would help with that.
>Does this remove the entire chatbox? It doesn't remove the chat box because you still need to see pings etc. but it prevents your allies AND you from typing in team chat.
Crazybg (EUNE)
: Am I misunderstanding something about normal draft pick mode?
>1. I put allowed here in quotes because obviously everything is allowed in every game mode, but I hope you understand what I mean. Everything is not actually allowed in every game mode, especially ranked. This is a common misconception that people have. There is a very fine line in ranked between trolling and playing "off-meta". The most recent famous case is the nubrac teemo thing.
Rioter Comments
: Hey, anyone willing to help me?
I find it weird that you would call yourself a mid laner when there is only one mid lane champion in your top 7 most played champions, and he is not even you most played champion. It seems like you actually main jungle and, not to be rude, you are kinda bad at it. I mean, you have less than 50% win rate on every jungler except vi which basically means you are powering through the jungle and not actually knowing what you are doing. Now it's time to learn to play the game properly. First thing that caught my eye is your cs/min. For a mid laner, it's unforgivable to consistently get around 5 cs/min in a match. It can sometimes happen if the circumstances are weird but not consistently. You have around 5 cs/min on average per game. You need to work on your last hitting a lot. A gold player should already know how to last hit. You seem to use wards pretty well but do you put them in the correct places? Do you put them in brushes at the mid lane entrance to the river? Because if you do, stop putting them there. Their value in those brushes is extremely low because people can walk around them unseen and when they spot an enemy coming to gank you, it's often too late at that point. So put them in places where they offer more intel. A good place is the entrance to the river from the raptors. How do you use your control wards? You seem to buy them but do you actually use or buy them after the laning phase? Use them at objectives to set them up for easy taking and to deny enemy from stealing it. You should also look for flanks with Talon when people are about to do objectives. Make sure they have no vision with stuff like control wards and sweeper and enter their carries' butt cheeks from behind when their front line is too busy trying to fight with your team. It's hard to say what you are doing wrong properly without watching your games but those are some things you can start with. Especially the cs part. Csing is the foundation to everything. The general rule of thumb is also to only play a select few champions. Like 3-ish champions. I don't recommend touching champions that you have under 50% wr with.
Trias000 (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=IWDodgeTheGame,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=69H5cnvi,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-07-15T22:30:27.017+0000) > > Start permanently banning Ezreal or Riven.They're champions who need knowledge,positioning and require a lot of patience during laning phase.You dont want them in your team. There's a higher chance they will be on the enemy team. Especially if nobody on your team is hovering those champions. And if someone is then banning those champs could make that player tilt.
>There's a higher chance they will be on the enemy team. No there isn't. The chances are exactly the same for both teams, assuming you aren't the one playing top or adc.
: Did you even read the First Post? seams not. And what you call facts^^ gee* you should google such words before using em. Talking about YT you saw the Series where low ranks play at the high ranked games and win ? Well you seams to be a proud rito fanboy blind for everything that don`t fit into your world ^^ So i keep you there...HF!
Admit that you are wrong and move on. It's that simple. You are taking this too far.
: Its fine if you can`t take em seriously. Not like i know you or care about your opinion much. If you think Elo proves a point your main elo must be silver. If you are that interested into my person, you can read my forum posts on this and the German Board. There are my Account names mentioned up to Gold. Last Season i hit Platin. Does that proves anything? Well if you have anything related to the topic to add we can go on with this^^ Otherwise you have not said much relevant yet tbh^^
>If you think Elo proves a point your main elo must be silver. Thinking that it doesn't, means you don't understand the context. If you make a statement where you tell people how to reach diamond, you need to be at least diamond to make that statement. Someone, who has never been diamond or higher, is not qualified to tell people how to get there. That's just a simple fact. Rank doesn't always make people's arguments right by default but in this context, a proper rank is required. Imagine gold players making youtube videos like "5 easy steps to reach diamond". What an insane credibility...
: i have nothing to prove here on boards^^ this is a forum account^^ you are free to interpret or take from my words what you can. on a side note English is not my mother tongue so i hope you can forgive me ^^
>i have nothing to prove here on boards^^ You don't have to prove it but it's pointless to make comments that people are never going to take seriously then. >this is a forum account^^ Nah, this doesn't really fly. You have recently played normal games on this account without friends which suggests this is a main account. Not to mention the win rate, the time your account has existed and the champions you play are all indicative of a main account. So i'm sorry but if you aren't proving us that this is indeed just an other account, you can't expect us to believe you. Not to be rude. >on a side note English is not my mother tongue so i hope you can forgive me ^^ I can forgive that. However, i was hoping for clarification.
: Well you just have to adapt right?! This means, first don`t play the lane you rather want to play. Then don`t play the Champ you rather want to play. And finish the game before the 30min mark where teamplay becomes to big of a factor to win^^ That is reaching Dia btw. in a nutshell^^ Best Game ever!
>That is reaching Dia btw. in a nutshell^^ It really isn't. Not to mention you aren't really in a position to tell people how to reach dia, are you? Considering you have never been above silver 5. You are disrespecting actual diamond+ players. As a side note, your second and third sentences don't make any sense. They are not written in proper English.
: Most of them duo. If you look at successful streamers very few get ahead without a duo partner.
Most of them don't duo... like what? And streamers are not an accurate representation of the player base or how they behave or how well they do.
Smerk (EUW)
: How? And when? It seems I missed it. Do you have any source?
At the start of the season. It was meant to better the matchmaking for the positional ranks but the positional ranks were cancelled but the matchmaking and mmr system wasn't. https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2019/03/dev-state-of-ranked/ >Even though we’re ending the position ranks preview, we made a ton of improvements to matchmaking in the process of building the feature—like faster queue times and higher primary position rates—that we’ll be keeping. We’re also looking into keeping positional matchmaking, which would make off-position games more fair even without position ranks. We’ll share more when we have a solid plan. They have talked about it before and in a bit more detail but i don't have the energy to look it up further.
Smerk (EUW)
: What new system?
mmr and matchmaking system were changed this season.
DasIstNyul (EUNE)
: Good point, but this cannot be changed or punished due to the fact that junglers are **not obligated** to help lanes. Yes, they are **supposed to**, but not obligated. This is the sad truth to it. I wish Riot would introduce punishment/counter-measure against these kind of people, who ruin games, caring about no one but themselves.
>Good point, but this cannot be changed or punished due to the fact that junglers are not obligated to help lanes. Yes, they are supposed to, but not obligated. This is the sad truth to it. True and not true. They actually break the rules if they refuse to help a lane out of spite. However, if they do that without declaring it i, chat, the system can't know if they do it out of spite or not so it can't punish them in those cases.
DasIstNyul (EUNE)
: Team ruiners
Especially this season, there has been a lot of "soft inting" going on. For those of you who don't know what soft inting is, it means a player who is deliberately losing the game by doing subtle things that guide the game towards a loss. Example behavior is refusing to help an ally by acting like you are blind, being in a team fight and intentionally missing skillshots and refusing to attack the enemy. Getting caught "accidentally" at a crucial moment in a spot where he should have never been in like face checking a brush when he knows the enemy is in the area. These are all things that should be punished but Riot's system simply can't detect it and it ruins the whole experience for everyone. And let's not forget the snowflake junglers who are the most selfish players in the entire game, refusing to help lanes if the laners even dare to ask nicely for a gank. I mean, you can ping the enemy who is basically under your tower with 500 hp, the easiest kill of your life, and the jungler just says "muted and reported" and refuses to come top because you used pings a few times to get his attention. It's safe to say that this kind of behavior triggers me to no end. People tend to say that people always blame the jungler. Truth be told though, it most likely is their fault at least partially most of the time. Very rarely any death is the fault of just one player. If a laner has asked the jungler to come because the enemy is an easy kill if he comes and is overextending, if the laner dies, it's both the laner's fault for dying and the jungler's fault for not helping a teammate who is baiting the enemy to stay for him. Ofc, if the jungler explicitly tells the laner that he is not coming (can't come, otherwise it's trolling), then it's purely the laner's fault.
: TFT Suggestions .. Should give XP after every game and RNG in items is quite bad
They can't give you XP for TFT unless they make it so that you can't gain XP from it before level 30. Imagine a guy playing only TFT, he gets to level 30 and hops into ranked without ever playing a game of league. A disaster. Another thing they could do is add TFT its own progress bar and when it's full, you can claim a capsule that gives you BE but not XP. That way people could still buy new champs without feeling like they are wasting their time with TFT.
: Is there any credibility on it being harder to rank up honor after getting a ban of some sort? It said that was the case on an ask riot post but I'm still not sure...
I vaguely remember a rioter saying that there is a multiplier for honor progress that is affected by your behavior. So you basically get some honor progress over time and the multiplier basically determines how fast you can level up. However, there are obviously certain days when the system checks if people are eligible for a level up. As an example, pretty much all of my level ups have happened on Wednesdays. Not always, but definitely mostly. There might be multiple times in a week they check it. So as an answer to your question, yes. I think it's safe to say that it's harder for people who have been punished before.
: Firstly: There has been multiple posts showing that both honors and number of games doesnt matter. Secondly: You should get one checkpoint per 14 days (+-) if you are an active player and don't get reported.
I am one of those players who made a pretty detailed post about the honor system. The 14 days per checkpoint only applies to honor levels below level 2. However, i have been chat banned a while back for 25 games so my honor dropped to 0. I got checkpoints every 2 weeks like my previous experiments showed i would but now that i have reached honor level 1, i have been stuck at honor level 1 - 0 check points for a month now. There has to be a bug in the system currently because that shouldn't happen and it's honestly demotivating. The reporting part shouldn't matter if the reports aren't valid.
Zanador (EUNE)
: Oh, sorry. I didn't know you were there when the decision was made.
DarkG0d (EUNE)
: If thats the reason who not add a function to enable/disable IFS ? ... rremoving the problem is better than making a better system I guess
I don't know. Too much work to add another checkbox i guess lol.
Zanador (EUNE)
: And naturally, there can't be more than one reason behind a decision, right?
Zanador (EUNE)
: To make the system harder to reverse engineer.
That's not the reason though. Even riot stated that it was because the players who were part of the testing didn't want to see every message.
kriegnes (EUW)
: what do you mean with breaking the rules? what rules did they break?
By rules he basically means how the game is expected to go. Like adc goes bot but g2 often puts a mage there or pyke top even though he has no chance of winning the lane.
: ill go all out disregarding riots opinions because they are fresh out from the sh*t factory
Some of their opinions are but you can't really disregard them as they guide what they are doing with the game. One example is that in their opinion, a full ranked reset wasn't necessary after they fcked up with the new ranked system this season. It was false but they don't admit it. We just have to deal with it then.
Silent Note (EUNE)
: Did you even read the post?
He obviously didn't. I bet he only read the title.
: soo picking an sub 50% wr is lowering your team's chances of winning by not a huge but still margin, that means picking something that has sub 50% wr is trolling, no matter if you want to win or you main that champ, I wanna pick my sub 50% wr champ whenever i feel like, and it's not bannable even if i will pick duelist without cc on support bcs I main that champ and im still trying to win.
I kinda expected someone to get stuck on that without actually grasping the meaning of what I said. Picking sub-optimal and picking something that isn't viable aren't the same thing.
: ***
I think we both know your response would still be against the rules as it is a direct insult. Don't act stupid.
Show more

GonahtanuGepardi

Level 199 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion