LoveYouAll (EUNE)
: Transfer issue
Last update we got was that it's scheduled to return in February.
Genitto (EUW)
: Im not a toxic player, never got even chat restricted, got a warning about afking but it was due to pc problems, and im still against the permabans for toxicity, but not because i feel its too harsh, but because its an easy way to solve the problem, while there are harder but more effective ways. First comes to mind something like low priority normal queue. Lets be realistic, even tho toxicity is really high in the game, u never get more than 1-2 flamer in a game. Lets take a random nonexistant (well, probably existant, but its an example, not a real person) player, who spent, lets say, 1k$ on his account, which is not the biggest amount of money u can spend on one lol account, but still plenty, he's been playing since, i dunno, s1, so he has rare kayle skin, and maybe even ufo corki. This guy is mostly playing ranked, it doesnt even matter, what rank he is, point is the guy is playing for competitive reasons even if he's hardstuck silver 5 for 9 years. He doesnt want to play normals or arams, he plays like 3-4 games of rotations gamemodes and come backs into ranked. So this guy loves his account, but he cant handle his anger and tilts quite easily which translates into flame, trigger words so the system has to punish him for his toxicity. Instead of giving him warning via chat restrictions, which he will obviously ignore, u could lock any gamemodes such as rankeds, usual normals (both draft and blind) arams etc and make available something like low priority queue (not the one we have now for leavers) where he will be playing ONLY normals with people who got detected by the system for flaming like he did. So basically this is the final punishment, and until his behavior improves, he sits in there, unable to play his favourite gamemode (it could be ranked, aram, normal games with an actual humans) make it like existing honor system, better u act, faster u get checkpoints and levels(so better u act, faster u get out of low priority queue). When his behavior improves, u let him play any mode he wants, if system detectes that he's toxic again, put him into lpq again but on a longer amount of time (but dont make it permanent, whole point of such punishment is lost if u do so). If u take account away from someone who's toxic, he's either gonna leave the game, which is a lose of loyal customer for you (in terms of profit ofc), or he'll create a new account, and keep acting like he used to act since "hey, i already got punished the hardest way possible, what they gonna do, permaban me again? pff". Permaban is a dead end for him and he knows it, he may whine in boards or in support ticket about reasons for him being toxic trying to justify it but u know it, i know it, he knows it u wont unban his account no matter what he says. So u r taking his account forever, but when u punish such guy WITHOUT baning his account, he has a hope of coming back, even if he put into lpq for a god damn month (in case he has perfect behavior and not a single swear word/passive-aggressive phrase typed during this period), he knows he'll be able to play whatever gamemode he wants on his beloved account. PS: damn, that is a long text. pog
Ranked restrictions were tried out for a while, but they didn't really show good reform rates. The main thing that happened was that you shifted bad behavior from one queue to another. All of Riot's behavior penalties are designed with player reform in mind. That is, all but one. Permabans are only issued once all other forms of penalties have been exhausted without the player showing signs of wanting to play by the rules. The penalties are designed to reform players, but to simply remove them. If the person wants to create a new account, there's no stopping them, but if they want to keep up with their behavior, Riot would rather they found something else to play. The amount of money a person spends does not matter, since Riot treats everyone equally. Having spent money isn't an excuse to be forgiven more than those that don't spend money. The rules apply to everyone, and being rich doesn't give you special rights in this game. --- > if u take account away from someone who's toxic, he's either gonna leave the game, which is a lose of loyal customer for you (in terms of profit ofc) Toxic players are one of the main reasons non-toxic players quit the game. Those non-toxic people have the potential to spend far more money in total than the permabanned toxic group of players that leave the game for good. Not banning toxic players in case they might spend money is simply bad for business.
: so why are smurfs allowed? are you stupid lol
Allowed, but not condoned. While in the ideal world there wouldn't be smurfs, it's a rule that would be simply impossible to uphold.
Sîmsline (EUW)
: Client needs an update
If it happens almost every day, I'd do a complete reinstall by uninstalling the game completely first. --- > And also, it downloaded 200mb more than there was shown as you can see in the picture. It downloaded 1480MB instead of 1255MB It's not actually downloading extra, it's just a display error that can happen when files are being moved around by the installer, making it count as if it's downloading it.
: Why Riot rescheduled the start of 2019 ranked season and 9.2 and didn't say anything about it? That's not the best way to treat players. I actually dont mind this, i have patience, i can wait, but Riot should communicate with players better.
But.. they did? Also, isn't it normal for a season to start then?
: ranked starts tommorow
If you sleep for over 24 hours, sure. 9.2 is scheduled to arrive on thursday.
: patch postponed by 24 hours.. so it will be on thursday?
Yes, it's scheduled for the 24th then. The client also states "2 more days" today.
: Actually no because I am too scared to reinstall the whole game because I already have a lot of Problems applying small patches {{sticker:sg-zephyr}} Sounds like something I should try tho..
It's not a guaranteed fix, but it's what I'd do. =/
: Applying Patches FOR EVER (120+ Mins)
Have you tried to completely uninstall the game, and download it again?
eron00 (EUW)
: What Time will the season Start?
I'd expect ranked to go up soon after the servers have been patched, at least within the same day. Patch is postponed by 24 hours due to Martin Luther King day, which was on monday.
Gavarta (EUW)
: im not saying to perma ban them im saying it would be much better if they put some ranked games restriction similar to the chat restrict in which they have to play 5-10 or more games on normal so they can calm the f down instead of being toxic %%%%s all the time and starting to tilt the whole team before the game even starts
Ranked Restrictions were tested out in the past, but it didn't really do much. If a system shows that it's not reforming players, there's no point in keeping it around. All it really did was move the problem from one area of a game to another, and that's not a solution.
Rinns (EUNE)
: I reported bug 3 times and its still not fixed!
> Network Operations – 09/01/2019 > We are currently looking into reports of clients displaying the wrong level of tier rewards from season end. This will not affect your current placement or matchmaking. [Service Status](https://status.leagueoflegends.com/?en_GB#euw).
DavidK14 (EUNE)
: Bad teammates cause bad behaviour. Not our faults the system doesn't care to look how the stuff started. > Permanent chat restrictions were tested out for a while, but it didn't work out, which is why it's removed. Didn't work? In what world would it not. Permanent chat restriction = no toxicity from the player and the only one they would be able to express is through their own feelings in the real world. > So what if they've spent money. The rules still apply to them just like anyone else. Yes they do, but I was not talking about that. I was talking about the fact losing an account due to one bad teammate that cause something to leak out from you isn't a great thing, is it? > If a player doesn't improve their behavior after multiple chat restrictions, what good will even more chat restrictions do? They've already shown to not be effective on that individual. More chat restrictions could give the person some information they should calm down, possibly just /mute others. a 10 and 25 games is truly nothing in the big run and can be ran through fast, 100 games? not so much anymore. > Nobody is banned due to bad teammates. They're banned due to their own behavior. That is completely true, but the system never did and never will understand who started the downhill chain. Unless it was another person who made the X player leak out, I don't think that's fair much, is it? Self-defense exists, right? I am 100% sure that there were situations that caused some fighting, and the person who got attacked on defended himself, after the game he ended up getting banned and the person who started it never did. > Penalties for verbal abuse come from trends in ones behavior. You think so? Alot of the community already know what the system instantly targets as punishment worthy, so I don't think any "trends" make sense here.
> Bad teammates cause bad behaviour. Not our faults the system doesn't care to look how the stuff started. That excuse doesn't work. You're responsible for your own behavior, nobody else. Everyone has a bad teammate once in a while, but that doesn't mean we all start being toxic. --- > Didn't work? In what world would it not. Because people that misbehave to the point where this penalty was required simply found other ways to ruin the game when they got mad and were unable to chat, such as intentionally feeding. It only allowed them to ruin even more games before getting the permaban they should've gotten in the first place. --- > Yes they do, but I was not talking about that. I was talking about the fact losing an account due to one bad teammate that cause something to leak out from you isn't a great thing, is it? But nobody loses their account due to a bad teammate, so I don't know why you raise that as an example. I've been active in the PB community for 6 years, and I have **never** seen anyone lose an account due to your example. --- > More chat restrictions could give the person some information they should calm down, possibly just /mute others. a 10 and 25 games is truly nothing in the big run and can be ran through fast, 100 games? not so much anymore. Increasing the length of the chat restriction is not likely going to help. Again, we had permanent restrictions, and they didn't help. --- > Self-defense exists, right? Yes, it's called the mute-button. That's self-defense. Retaliation is **not** defending yourself. --- > and the person who got attacked on defended himself, after the game he ended up getting banned and the person who started it never did. Again, after 6 years I've never seen someone "defending" themselves get banned, because defending themselves is muting the offending player and reporting them once the game is over. Once you start retaliating, you're not longer defending yourself. You're just being toxic.
DavidK14 (EUNE)
: Discussion about toxic behaviour punishments.
If a player doesn't improve their behavior after multiple chat restrictions, what good will even more chat restrictions do? They've already shown to not be effective on that individual. Permanent chat restrictions were tested out for a while, but it didn't work out, which is why it's removed. --- > And yes, I do understand that it is the player's fault they are being toxic, but often times it's one simple bad game that can ruin a great account. Penalties for verbal abuse come from trends in ones behavior. It would only punish you for a single game in cases of extreme abuse, such as homophobia, racism, death threats, etc. You can't blame that one a bad game. --- > What if the person has spent alot of money (let's say $150 on the account) and because of a bad teammate he ends up getting a permanent ban. So what if they've spent money. The rules still apply to them just like anyone else. **Nobody** is banned due to bad teammates. They're banned due to their own behavior.
HitYourHead (EUNE)
: Well maybe, but still how you feel to be told you lie in your face that you didn't watch enough when you knew you did watch hours of live stream. Anyway I don't care about support, this post was more for people that constantly contradict somebody and downvote someone and keep invent excuses, maybe you didn't log in, maybe you didn't do that or that!
There's absolutely no need to be so aggressive towards people that were simply trying to help. The missions worked for a lot of people, so it's not like everyone had the problem. While I don't know why it took so long to get a notification up on the service tracker, Riot support has confirmed the issue for a while already.
RayleighTT (EUNE)
: just 1 question...
You'll need to get the S when the chest is available. Otherwise you could just farm S for a week on many champions, and keep getting a steady supply of chests for the rest of the year without having to do anything.
: They will have to tune it to a significant level though. Losing 5 LP is not going to be much of a loss for these particular players.
Again, the dev diary actually specifically mentions this: It starts low, but ramps up if you keep losing.
Vegito101 (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hansiman,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=zbyxB033,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-01-22T13:46:30.781+0000) > > If you read the dev diaries on the matter, you'll see that there's "lp splashing", so losing on autofilled roles will impact your main roles. I don't get it what is the difference then...what means"lp splashing"???
It means, in the case you presented, that if you lose when autofilled, you're going to lose some LP on your main roles as well. This is to prevent people from trolling.
Vegito101 (EUNE)
: There is a big problem in New rank system.i don't know did anyone tallked about it before .. So problem is off role that you get as autofill...Now people would not care to win on autofill.they did before because they get or loose lp ... Now if your autofill have no impact on your main role lp why would you care giveing a shit about it ..So you just go full troll mode and ruin other 4 teammates experience with 0 real cost to you and your main role lp...
If you read the dev diaries on the matter, you'll see that there's "lp splashing", so losing on autofilled roles will impact your main roles.
: New season starts tomorrow - Season 9
https://images2.imgbox.com/54/e0/CBcurEic_o.jpg Starts tomorrow in two days. So tomorrow, it starts tomorrow. https://static-cdn.jtvnw.net/emoticons/v1/1787441/2.0 --- > Did anyone else widen their roster for season 9? Can't really say until season 9 begins. I play what I play, and change if I see it doesn't work.
Natsukoii (EUW)
: Friend didn't recieve gift
Send in a ticket to support directly with all the details. You can contact them [here](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new).
MrTeTe (EUNE)
: what about the troller and the annyoing dodging in the game it clearly show how many people don't like being autofilled i just had like 4 dodges in a row in my team
> what about the troller People who intent to actually troll will do so regardless of what system is in place. They'd just justify their actions by making up some other excuse. Most people that are autofilled do actually play like they should.
MrTeTe (EUNE)
: atleast it makes the match more fun for the player tbh i would rather wait than play a role that i don't want to play and in this way we can get rid of the trolls and dodging in the game and like i said in the end you can always just play normally without that option so that you don't have to wait
> i would rather wait than play a role that i don't want to play You, maybe, but not the majority. Autofill is a compromise to respond to the majority demands of shorter queue timers. Before it was introduced, higher areas of the ranked ladder had 60+ minutes wait time to get into champion select. Even on the lower ends, people often had to wait 10+ minutes in queue. --- > and like i said in the end you can always just play normally without that option so that you don't have to wait Including that option makes **everyone** wait, not just the ones who opt in for it.
MrTeTe (EUNE)
: The Issue With AutoFill And How Riot Can Fix It
> they can add an option that can guarantee your role. Adding this renders the entire autofill system pointless, thus bringing back the problem of terrible queue timers we had that forced the system to be implemented in the first place. This doesn't just cause the people signing up for the option to wait longer, but rather it forces **everyone** to wait longer.
: 20 min low priority q glitch
If your computer goes to sleep, you leave the queue.
: I see where you are coming from. But hey, that's what this is for. How many champs do you own? All of them? Ever feel like it takes you forever to get that single champ that you've been craving to try out and discover how they work? Its just discouraging at times. I do appreciate the addition of events (a much needed addition). When did you start playing because yes this iteration of currency is quicker than what it used to be, it does show that but still the almost once a level where you obtain a 'worthy' amount of BE feels unsatisfying with RNG and the unreliability of getting a certain amount for a champ and having to grind another level in order to close the final gap if you are not far away.
> How many champs do you own? All of them? No, I'm missing about 50 I guess. --- > Ever feel like it takes you forever to get that single champ that you've been craving to try out and discover how they work? More so in the past, when grinding took longer. --- > When did you start playing because yes this iteration of currency is quicker than what it used to be End of season 2.
: Thank you for responding to my post. Firstly I would like to say that personally, I don't want to go back to the old system either. I do enjoy the new way league works, besides the RNG that can make levelling feel less rewarding than ideal. An example being told within the original post. I just feel as though there must be a better way to obtain BE for players rather than just crossing our fingers and hoping to get a decent amount each levelling cycle. That's why I decided to put my thoughts here and see what happens, including thoughts and concepts for how the system might be improved for other players. I understand what you mean about the daily mission, fair point and now I do agree with it more thanks to you. But for the missions, I feel as though waiting around for each event spree can be a bit annoying. Lets take the last one as an example. I completed every mission that was posted, and obtained the low level exchangeable goods for the tokens. I felt underwhelmed though as I didn't really progress BE wise which reminded me again of the RNG will eventually face, numerous times over. Maybe im just blabbering here but what changes would you make, if any to BE?
I don't see why it needs changes though to some extent. Even by RNG, you're getting more than you used to. Upgrading shards is the cheapest way to get new champions, because you get a discount from what the full champion cost is in the store. The downside of this is that it is RNG which champion you'll get to unlock next. If you are after specific champions, you can disenchant the shards you get and unlock them for full price in the store. Even through this method, you'll be unlocking content faster than with the old system. In the past, there was rarely any events or missions that gave us any bonus IP. Now, it's very common that we get missions that grant us BE.
: Okay, total bullsh*t, but okay. Banned for having fun, great. It is always so easy to talk about bans if you were not there anyways, and then just stick to garbage arguments, but ye that's what Riot does every time. If you were in my position, you would have talked a lot different. Seems that random reports work, so I advice to everyone, just report everyone after each game and it will result in random bans everywhere! :DD
There was absolutely nothing random about the report against you.
: Oh yes I know who, since there was just one mad person and the other 2 left immediately. And that person didn't report me because of that (since it wasn't meant to him) :)
What does it matter who reported you anyway? You broke the rules by using hate speech, and it's your behavior that got you punished; not the reports of others.
: The Blue Essence Problem
Personally I don't want to go back to the old system, considering it gave us less currency than we get now. The new BE system (with capsule drops upon leveling) grants you a higher amount of BE than you got IP after every game in the past. It's designed to help people unlock content faster, something it does. --- > Bring in more daily missions as well as bring in Weekly missions that reward BE There's been a bunch of missions that have granted you a lot of extra BE if you completed them, generally tied to events. --- > For the past months the daily win just felt unworthy at times in regards to BE, not the XP The daily mission is intended for its XP value, not BE. Originally it only granted XP (at a slightly higher value), but some XP was traded out for 50 BE instead.
: But my brother didn't report me, and the gp player didn't report me for that, since I didn't say it to him. It's just finding a reason... But they can see mine, so what? If I didn't flame them, that doesn't matter, right?
A lot of players will report you if you're using hate speech, even if you don't target it at them directly. There's never any reason to use such slurs. Someone reported you, and you won't know who. Your punishment is perfectly valid.
: Things I had been banned for, according to Rioteer: In game: TimingTaurus (Sejuani): %%% Post-game: TimingTaurus: Ty ezreal for assisting enemy team TimingTaurus: Why are you crying, you have won the game x) TimingTaurus: Must be sad TimingTaurus: We are praying for you, gp To clarify: %%% is verbal abuse and ban worthy, IF used as a way to insult people, which it wasn't, since I said it to my brother like brothers do (maybe not all, but we do that)... Crying thing was about the enemy, they were complaning and flaming each other post-game, and I was just wondering why they were doing that, while they won the game.. (Don't see the negativity in that) The praying thing to gp: I don't know what gp said in game, since I muted everyone in game, as I did last 5 months after the 14-days ban, which I can admit I deserved it. But post game the first thing he said (to mybrother) was: "Nami (my brother) %%% please", and later on "bunch of disabled people" to us as well. I decided not to flame back to him, because it makes no sense anyways, so I just said that. Wasn't mad the entire game, went 11-3-23 with sejuani so I was just quite happy. And then the pop-up of penalty pops up and turns out to be a perma ban, just because gp was mad and just reported us.
I answered you in another thread, but I'll paste the reply here: --- > To clarify: %%% was against my brother in a way brothers do.. There's 0 tolerance for homophobic slurs, as it's considered hate speech. Claiming that it was towards your brother isn't a defense here, because it's still not tolerated. --- > (I muted everyone anyways, except my brother) That just means you won't see their messages. They'll still see yours.
: TimingTaurus: gj TimingTaurus: gj TimingTaurus: meestal met ezreal TimingTaurus: hello yasuo TimingTaurus: altijd zo fijn als mensen ss'en enzo ..... TimingTaurus: waste TimingTaurus: yasuo ss..................................................... TimingTaurus: once TimingTaurus: ze heeft ult gebruikt nu iig TimingTaurus: nice TimingTaurus: Yasuo can you stay alive for more than 20 seconds now :DD TimingTaurus: what TimingTaurus: hoe was dat niet raak TimingTaurus: why are you still trying TimingTaurus: -,- TimingTaurus: %%% TimingTaurus: lol TimingTaurus: risky TimingTaurus: predictable TimingTaurus: 1-11 ezreal call boys xD TimingTaurus: how freaking stupid Things where i have been banned for according to rioteers: TimingTaurus: %%% TimingTaurus: Ty ezreal for assisting enemy team TimingTaurus: Why are you crying, you have won the game x) TimingTaurus: Must be sad TimingTaurus: We are praying for you, gp To clarify: %%% was against my brother in a way brothers do.. (I muted everyone anyways, except my brother) Gp was the flamer that said to my brother: "%%% please" and to all: "bunch of disabled" About the crying thing: I was just wondering why they were complaining, since they (enemy) won the game. Plus the fact that I wasn't even mad. I went 11-3-23 or so with sejuani so I had no reason to flame, but Riot thinks i'm a really bad person that flames every game...
> To clarify: %%% was against my brother in a way brothers do.. There's 0 tolerance for homophobic slurs, as it's considered hate speech. Claiming that it was towards your brother isn't a defense here, because it's still not tolerated. --- > (I muted everyone anyways, except my brother) That just means you won't see their messages. They'll still see yours.
: It does trigger based on a single game + there is no tolerance. I muted my team and other team last 4 months and didn't flame (cuz why would I). Then there is just another game, same stuff, wasn't mad or something, didn't flame anyone. After the game someone wishes someone else's death + calling others disabled and I responded in an ironic way, like: "We will pray for you". But because this guy just reported everyone, because he was mad, I got a permanent ban :DDDD To empower my statement of not being mad: I went 11-3-23 or so with sejuani, so there was simply no reason for it. You can't say "Riot has some tolerance", cuz they haven't. also, that was the only game, showing up in the chat log :D
> It does trigger based on a single game + there is no tolerance. In cases of extreme verbal abuse, yes. But that won't trigger a chat restriction, but rather a 14 day ban. For milder cases of toxicity, the type that leads to chat restrictions, it requires more than a single game. --- > But because this guy just reported everyone, because he was mad, I got a permanent ban I would love to see the chat logs you were issued, because I highly doubt your story. --- > also, that was the only game, showing up in the chat log :D The reform card is not a complete history of all the games you misbehaved in. It's just a sample.
: Nowaday bots
Bots are banned in waves, rather than individually. This makes it so that it's much harder for the people that use, and develop, botting software to know exactly how they're being detected, ultimately making the problem less than it could be. Generally, bots will only exist in the lower MMR ranges. If you keep climbing, you'll stop seeing them.
Karnisse (EUW)
: Can not get the available Chest with more than a S- grad
You need to own the champions in order to get a chest. Playing one on free rotation won't count.
Gavarta (EUW)
: that chat restriction is the most useless thing riot could make ... the toxic flamers who get restricted still use the times when they can talk to still flame :D honestly ranked games restriction would be much better
It holds a higher reform rate than the short bans that existed in the past, which is the main goal. --- > honestly ranked games restriction would be much better We had that for a while. Know why we don't anymore? It doesn't work.
Dinzyy (EUW)
: HELP! Have some troubles to get rewards. I found out my whole account/profile seems to be F'd up.
The level was updated once you posted on the boards. It forces a sync to happen. However, I've never seen that match history problem, and I'll see if there's someone I can ask about it.
Kaluchi (EUW)
: I like intro's which are good. I enjoy good intro's. however if its boring, too long or just bad i press skip. That's why i wanted to share this with you guys on the boards. Would you guys skip this intro or skip the vid in a whole? Making intro's btw is a way of recognizing a certain channel if its played enough times.
If you're asking me personally, any 15 second intro on a channel would make me find other channels to watch. Ofcourse, other may have a completely different opinion. --- > Making intro's btw is a way of recognizing a certain channel if its played enough times. But quite honestly, your intro isn't anything special. It's a rather overused formula of having a bunch of random scenes cut to some music. There's nothing recognizable about it that makes me say that this video can only belong to Kaluchi. It could belong to any of the hundreds of generic intros channels use.
: im not sure about honor reset tho sicne the chat restricted have time til february to reach lvl 2 for their rewards if it resets at season start it would amke it kinda easy for them to get this done so i think riot will delay the honor reset not sure tho some official answer would be cool if any riotler reads that
Honor should reset together with the season, but resets are only for those honor 2 -> 5. Those that are honor 1 or 0 would have to climb themselves anyway, since the reset does not impact them.
Wooterrr (EUW)
: Exclusive hextech malzahar skin
Try to relog. Generally that'll solve it.
: Imo end the intro where Lucian points his guns. As the other user mentioned a 15 second intro is far too long, and that way you should be able to keep it around the 10 sec mark.
Personally I'd say even 10 seconds is too long, and I don't see why it's needed with flashy intros that your viewers will probably get tired of anyway. Look at Voyboy's youtube intros: It's very simple, and lasts roughly 5 seconds. --- I'm actually one of those that don't bother skipping long intros, but press that "back" button in my browser and find something else to watch.
Lari (EUNE)
: I got the message of chat restriction for 2 games but the Bot of the support said that i have been reported the last 12 games. But that does not mean that the reports where on point people tend to report randomly so if they thought i did not gank match they will probably report me for harassment even though i never flamed them. And the AI would think that "i can not gank you cause your lane is fed" is flame
> But that does not mean that the reports where on point people tend to report randomly Not really actually. People tend to report cases of misbehavior. A threat of a report isn't the same as a report. If you were reported in 12/12 games, I'd honestly expect that to be abnormally high. --- > so if they thought i did not gank match they will probably report me for harassment even though i never flamed them. So what if they reported you? False reports are filtered away anyway. Reports can only trigger an investigation to happen, nothing more. Once an investigation takes place, it's your behavior that's judged, nothing else.
Lari (EUNE)
: To be honest it said the last 12 games to me that is 1-2 days of gaming so i got chat restricted for having a bad day. That is why there was no tolerance
If you were stepping out of line in 12 games, that's pretty high tbh. But did it specifically say 12 games, or was that something support said?
Lari (EUNE)
: You know before the last chat restriction i was positive no matter what the other said it did not matter i was just muting them. But at the 1000th time someone wished for the my mothers death or he was harassing me and cursing me in game , i gave an answer (not flaming ,) r when someone was cursing me because he is bad at the game i also answered. But i did not flame. There should be some tolerance here. I don't know how often do you play the game but i play a lot and i deal with that daily. It is only logical that this will get in your head for a while. I know there are people who say just mute everyone, but i am not antisocial i want to communicate with the people i team up with.
If you were chat restricted, then you were issued a log containing details of what you said in your games that triggered the restrictions. --- > There should be some tolerance here. And there is, because Riot is well aware that we're all human and have emotions. Chat restrictions appear once you've displayed an unwanted trend in your behavior recently. It does not trigger based on a single game. If you got restricted, that simply means you've been stepping out of line a bit too much lately.
Lari (EUNE)
: Question about chat restrictions
> I have always wondered why do people get chat restricted when they answer to flamers or why if 3 premades report you, you get instantly chat restricted. In short, you don't. --- > why do people get chat restricted when they answer to flamers Honestly, people tend to think that retaliation is "answering" to flamers. If you're flaming someone flaming, are you not just flaming? --- > why if 3 premades report you, you get instantly chat restricted. You don't. They don't hold extra reporting power over you. Their reports will **never** get you chat restricted. It's your behavior that gets you in trouble.
: Its not working for me either and ive been watching lck too! and i have the cookies set up correctly they have been unchanged since worlds and it was working back then
LCK is known to not be working atm. Try watching a VOD from the Brazilian league.
Shamose (EUW)
: Nice biased thread. Of course the decline is all about how Riot is running the game into the ground. Not about how a new Free2Play title has exlpoded in popularity or how a long time juggernaut MMO just released a new Expansion. But of course, _Rito bad._
There probably is a bit too it though, but I highly doubt the decline is simply based on that. Most likely, the main reason for the decline is the release of Fortnite (which happened mid-2017). Prior to this, LoL didn't really have any proper competition from large games. Fortnite has quickly become the largest game based on revenue, at $2.4B. It's likely that a lot of people that would normally have spent money on LoL have now spent it on Fortnite instead. Their move to Fortnite may simply be caused by them having played LoL for so long that they're tired of it.
takar36 (EUW)
: I didn't know that prior to the ban. I just thought it was some random words. Is there by any chance a list of words I could restrain from saying ?
Not knowing is not a defense in cases like this. No, there's no specific list to go by. Racist words are a no go, regardless. If they were to issue a specific list, players would simply be racist using other words and claiming they can't be banned because it's not on the list.
takar36 (EUW)
: 14 Day Suspension
You're using a phrase that is considered a racial slur towards chinese people. There's 0 tolerance in this game for behavior like this.
Show more

Hansiman

Level 95 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion