: Hey Man Nice to see you are willing to improve before charging a free for your services. I'm always willing to be give you a chance at coaching. For what it's worth: i'm currently applying for some teams (Diamond +), but i could also use some of your tips for my SoloQ Experience Willing to have a convo?
Yes sure just add me, im always up for conversations especially deep ones or indepth ones about league :D
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Inugamí,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=kgEQUKiK,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-04-16T01:15:35.049+0000) > > Right now ganking is extremely important i agree to some extend depends on Elo kinda, in high elo a laner who gets a kill from his jungler can actually push his lead most of the time doesnt really happen in low Elo and i personally find especially in early levels if you choose the wrong ganks you might get heavily invaded and lose a ton of xp and that can be really punishing. I really often opt to invade and look for ganks lately but i can imagine that to be harder in higher elos master and grandmaster. > > And how exactly do champs like reksai and kindred powerfarm both crabs i myself play a ton of kindred and i know reksai and if you consider pathing and starting at crabs you can predict (if you ward the pixel brush at the right time you even can see where a jungler will take the crab) with that information you can always go to the other crab if you cant or wont contest the first one, so you trade which often happens often for champs like reksai and kindred since both of them dont have the best lvl 2's for a fight unlike for example j4, lee, xin etc. And i think its fair later in the game if you dont instantly show up for the crab and take one or contest it against the other that you can go emptyhanded, you might need to lower the income of the crabs so it doesnt snowball too hard if you get too far ahead, but if you play smart around it you should most often be able to take 1 crab the opposite one of your opponent if you dont wanna fight. But shrinking the value of the crab is something riot wants to do anyway already so i would like the addition of 2 crabs. if rek sai for example is 2/0 and there are no buffs, then she can just run bot to top side crab, the value of the Vision adn pressure provided by those crabs, gives a huge Advantage to the laners, meaning that Picking early game Champs who can snowball into midgame becomes even more important, because no other junglers can pass the river with the Risk of contesting crabs or face checking kindred/rek sai (both can go over the Dragon/nash wall and can catch enemy junglers fairly easy when they get a Speed Boosts/face check, ist very diffrent for elise and nidalee, who lack cc and cant catch the enemy junglers as easy as those two. Riot should just make junglers who scale better more powerfull than toplaners/midgame midlaners otherwiese thge upside of getting into the later stages of the game is too low for carry junglers to be played
Early is very important true, and strangely kindred is for many considered bad early and good in scaling terms which i personally disagree on i think she can have a really strong early not in everymatchup but often, and well she still scales well into late unlike reksai for example. The thing is tho that in competitive something like karthus is viable he pretty much only farms since you can outmove your oppenent and each player gets one crab so you can work your way around with scaling junglers very much and we had strong scaling junglers for a while, only farming is now not as effective anymore but at times still viable. The thing is if you could get stronger in terms of scaling as jungler than a laner in late game it would destroy lower or mid tier elo. People would just sit again in their jungle farm away and after 25 min come out of there and kill everyone as it was in S4 or S5 with the lantern and that is also rather boring to be fair. And the role of the jungler itself doesnt allow too many scaling champs anyway since Junglers have always been falling off late game since you cant farm as much and usually ap carry and ad carry are made to scale into late. Jungle impact early and midgame is the strong part of it and it always has been that way in competitive at least now more than ever tho
: I mained shaco a lot bot just as u said, its always the jungler fault :D even if i was 5-1-8, top or mid will just flame u since u left them alone ( who the %%%% would gank an 5 kill darius with shaco ??? ) But i think rather than the jungle camps, i think its hsould be MORE worth to get a successful gank as a jungler. Lets say : ADC or supp goes mid to get an extra kill : its should be the same as now. BUT : the jungler goes mid and make a successful gank ( i mean kill ofc ). then the jungler ( ONLY him, not the laner ) should get something extra. Making it worth to gank over farming ur jungle.
I dont know about that idea in that exact form at least, you gank alot as jungler and alot of the time you dont even want the kill for yourself especially not every kill for yourself since you want to make your laner stronger so he wins on his own so he can maybe roam to also help other lanes and yourself for objetives and invades maybe. But with this every jungler would take every kill and would try to make it his solo mission to carry the game. I dont think that would be good in a team game, and even if you would also get rewarded more on assists that would make you as a jungler too powerful since if you then gank alot yo u get so much gold you should probably never farm your jungle unless you cant gank anywhere at that time. And it would benefit heavily gank heavy jungler and would leave no place for farmheavy jungler or teamorientated junglers like ivern maybe.
Chrysies (EUW)
: Although I agree with you for the most part of that little rant, I do have a suggestion for you (this is no dig at you personally since a lot of people do the same). When writing posts this long, take the time to fill in some spacings and punctuation (even if you aren't a wizard at grammar). Just try and make it sound like the way you would say it irl, with natural pauses between sentences.
its quite long and that would take effort especially since it isnt my mother tongue as you probably noticed. And i wouldnt call it that much of a rant because i think i made valid points on real problems right now for junglers but im not a game designer of course and i can only hope riot makes good decissions in the future for the role.
: I agree with you, i've played jungle since season 6 and this has to be the worst the role has been since then. You used to be able to farm blue side for lv3, and now you need 44-48 cs to hit level 6. You are normally around the same level as the ad carry. Red and blue smite get nerfed, Scuttle crab is too important earlygame. Trackers knife and an item i actually enjoyed building, Poachers Dirk get removed. Worst of all, the amount of whiny players who just complain to the jungler about litrally everything wrong in the match is terrible. Since when was warding and looking at the map so difficult for players? Overall i hope they attempt to make this role interesting again. Its stressful playing this %%%%ing role and it's resorted to me recieving multiple chat restrictions because i can't keep my cool with my feeding laners using me as a scapegoat. To end on a good note, new wits end is amazing and butchers bridge should be the permanent aram.
I agree with you jungle has become very stressful at times, which certainly adds up. You constantly have to try to path efficent try to get ganks off on the whole map be ready to secure objetives like drake and baron/herald (and keep track of your exact smite dmg) you need to keep the same lvl as the enemy jungler, get deep vision for the team try to track the enemy jungler so you can countergank or be on the opposite map, look for the crab spawns and you constatly need to alter your pathing to keep it efficent if you wanna stay ahead, when i played in ateam and also had the role of shotcalling for the team for fights rotations and objectives it simply became too much for me personally i gotta say. And i also like to invade alot personally since i can track the enemy rather well in my elo but it can be so risky and the rewards can be kinda dissapointing, Riot has often declared how they want to reward invaders more and people who can pull of somehing like that butchers bridge was one of those ways sadly removed( although i think the item was not exactly the best design) there is nothing except for the xp advantage or the kills you can gain from getting yourself in enemy territory where you are surronded by enemy lanes who could gang up on you anytime. I mean yes you deny xp maybe but meh. Hope riot implements something intersting in that regard soon.
: Jungle is now more About who gets more "lucky" ganks than who has the better pathing/ Clearing efficency, had a adc main pick lee run around gank every lane and get 15 kills in a 20 min game. In my opinion the Problem is not the xp, but the Gold efficency of junglers, there are rarely any true jungle carry Champs in the current meta, because early game is way to imprortant, having both scutles be up at the same time is really bad, because snowbally Champs like kindred and rek sai can just powerfarm both scutles if they are ahead and still be close to the lanes to perma gank and Control the river
Right now ganking is extremely important i agree to some extend depends on Elo kinda, in high elo a laner who gets a kill from his jungler can actually push his lead most of the time doesnt really happen in low Elo and i personally find especially in early levels if you choose the wrong ganks you might get heavily invaded and lose a ton of xp and that can be really punishing. I really often opt to invade and look for ganks lately but i can imagine that to be harder in higher elos master and grandmaster. And how exactly do champs like reksai and kindred powerfarm both crabs i myself play a ton of kindred and i know reksai and if you consider pathing and starting at crabs you can predict (if you ward the pixel brush at the right time you even can see where a jungler will take the crab) with that information you can always go to the other crab if you cant or wont contest the first one, so you trade which often happens often for champs like reksai and kindred since both of them dont have the best lvl 2's for a fight unlike for example j4, lee, xin etc. And i think its fair later in the game if you dont instantly show up for the crab and take one or contest it against the other that you can go emptyhanded, you might need to lower the income of the crabs so it doesnt snowball too hard if you get too far ahead, but if you play smart around it you should most often be able to take 1 crab the opposite one of your opponent if you dont wanna fight. But shrinking the value of the crab is something riot wants to do anyway already so i would like the addition of 2 crabs.
Chrysies (EUW)
: Although I agree with you for the most part of that little rant, I do have a suggestion for you (this is no dig at you personally since a lot of people do the same). When writing posts this long, take the time to fill in some spacings and punctuation (even if you aren't a wizard at grammar). Just try and make it sound like the way you would say it irl, with natural pauses between sentences.
its quite long and that would take effort especially since it isnt my mother tongue as you probably noticed. And i wouldnt call it that much of a rant because i think i made valid points on real problems right now for junglers but im not a game designer of course and i can only hope riot makes good decissions in the future for the role.
Rioter Comments
: I found it an interesting topic to reply, but I hated you because I had to write a wall of text about it. Don't take it seriously. {{sticker:sg-lux}} Regarding Riot's statements about Neeko's sexual preferences, I think it's a pr move, in the sense that **they can add an attractive character to the game, without having to deal with negative feedback and complains about unnecessary over-sexualization or objectification** (such as those they had with Caitlyn, Kai'Sa or the first version of Quinn's valentine skin, or Blizzard had with Widowmaker and Tracer's victory pose controversy). You mentioned you like Illaoi as a character, so it's pretty clear that attractiveness is not a priority for choosing your champions. But most important for a company than adding more characters (which are free to purchase), is to actually sell some content. So, if you get skins and stuff for champions regardless of their sex appeal, then you are not the target group for this kind of merchandise (good looking champions that is). Regarding your claims about pedophilia, this may turn into another long post, but I speculate the attractiveness mostly comes from the facial characteristics. You will find many relative articles on the internet, for example, one such from Psychology Today (it's about a study regarding what people find attractive), says at some point: "_Although there was a healthy amount of agreement between the sexes on what facial features were perceived as attractive, there were also some areas of disconnect... **men consider women whose faces are closer to the population average, and with juvenile features, as especially attractive**. Nevertheless, women—in their self-perception—give a higher relevance to features that present greater sexual dimorphism [femininity]_" https://bit.ly/2EtJjKf I don't know if that actually ease your concerns :v but it proves youthful faces seem more desirable. If that's not your cup of tea, it's perfectly fine, however, when you design characters to sell products you have to take all things into account. Plus, let's not forget a good chunk of gamers (possible costumers) are teenagers, so an easy on the eye character around their age, makes more sense to them. Sorry for the delayed response.
Well now this is a way better text and consctructive, but i dont disagree there at all that was my stand Riot as a designer do what they do to either sell something or getting their image back in track just like other companies do when people raged over the stereotypical symmetry of overwatch characters on female characters they showed zarya as a response so i would say not every move has to be directly sex sells, like good lore or gameplay can sell as well maybe not as good, but sometimes maybe better i can imagine. but as you say and as i meant riot didnt do any wrong here as far as im concerned they are not oversexualising the character or stating her sexual orientation completly upfrond in her lore maybe there are hints for people to pick up and interpretate as they desire, and that can be fun and cool thing to do, i personally thought tho it was a little overboard with neeko especially if she is supposed to be a childlike character that may just be my interpretation anyway tho so ye. late answer anyway but i feel like that thing has calmed down now anyway so it doesnt really concern me anymore personally lets have fun with the game we love :) cheers
: > I just feel this is either a pr move from riot as just saying ye she is lesbian so all lesbians have a champ to relate to, since its the first one. I hate you. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}} I will say my point of view on this, but Idk where to start.. (that's why :P ) Some patches ago, I remember Riot saying they would try not to create oversexualized characters, because they wanted to be politically correct. Unless of course, this would get justified by their lore or something. So we saw the likes of Illaoi and Camille joining the cast, which they advertised as characters with very deep personality and lore. Now think about it. Since the time Illaoi was released, how many skins she and Camille got combined, with their _amazing _ personalities, compared to Lux. Who has a background story as interest as Fiddle's. Do you even remember how Lux's old skins looked like? Their theme was militaristic, tomboyish, you name it. After the Star Guardian however, she wears the same top and skirt in every skin since. People were saying about her Lunar skin that it was just one more form of Elementalist's. You know why? Because Riot finally discovered Lux is actually good looking and they should do something about it! A LoL girl doesn't have to be mature or provocative like Miss or Evelynn to sell skins. She can have great success just by being pretty and cute. Because like it or not, sex sells, that's all. That's something everyone knows in advertising. Good stories and complex characters, do exist and they are successful. Think of Jhin for example. And yet, nothing can surpass the demand for an attractive character. It's faster, it's easier, and involves less risk. But here's the problem. When they released Kai'sa, people complained about her attire. And Riot admitted it was -kind of- a mistake. More like something rushed, it didn't 100% worked out. For me, this shows that companies want to include attractive characters because that brings demand, they just have to justify it IF there is potential backlash. And now back to Neeko. Imagine for a moment she is a straight girl/woman. Now look at her art. Say what you want. Neeko is attractive af in this one. She has the most suggestive pose yet in the game. Justify it by being half reptilian, by being innocent, it doesn't change it. From the outfit to her good looks, to her posture.. it just shouts attractiveness. And that brings the same old complains, about sexual objectification- UNLESS there was a way to make her a hero and shut the mouths up. So in my humble opinion, they just threw in the "she is a lesbian" scenario, to prevent the sexist wars from erupting once more, by handing her over to the LGBT community, which they would support as one of them. Now you are thinking "but isn't Neeko closer to a teenager/child?" I have something to tell you about that. **Dead or Alive**. That game is notorious for making money out of oversexualized characters. Does it make that much profit? All you have to do is calculate how much the DLCs cost, which btw, are all skins :thinking:. Now make a quick search for the most popular ones for lewd content (if not the most), and who will you find? Marie Rose. Tell me she doesn't look younger than Neeko. BUT it's ok, because according to the developers she just looks young, she is actually over 18. So is with Neeko, who may mistakenly looks suggestive, BUT she is actually a lesbian and hates men ;) . If you are too sensitive about it to the point you won't buy skins or search Rule 34, that's fine. But I don't think so. Even Box Box commented (via his Twitter account) on the fact people had already flood the internet with Neeko's hentai content, long before her official release. So the interest is there. So, why did I mention Lux early on? I believe Neeko doesn't only look good, she also looks familiar. I **think**, her in game model resembles the quite popular Lux, more than any other female champion. I don't know why, does anyone sees that or am I alone on this one? {{champion:32}} It's just her figure and hair reminded me of the popular Elementalist Fire form. Plus her Q looks like an alternative version of Lux's Q. I don't say they have similar gameplay by any means lol. It's just that... Neeko doesn't look so alien, like Aurelion Sol did. And that's something I take into account when I try a new champion. I mean, I want to feel a little comfortable, especially when I try something new. Maybe it's something that adds up for success. I don't know if there is even one person who appreciates such long posts, I am sorry for that. I just want to say that for Riot, **Neeko is and will remain a Lesbian**, because it works wonders. (And.. i'm done {{summoner:3}} )
No clue why you would hate me tho really. If this little text tells you that much aye Ye but as you say sex sells so it is a pr move in the end ? so i dont quite get why you disagree with that ? And her reptialan look and the form she poses in and her that she doesnt have any curves makes her sexy or attractive ? I dont fiind her in anyway Sexy also im not pedophile maybe thats why :D, i have no problem with handling rule 34 its the internet what i dont like is that everybody cares about it so much if she is lesbian or not, while its not even a part of her lore and she acts like a child she doesnt just look like one. To be honest i dont find her design attractive either its a very different style than usual, and it seems like a more uncommon style to lift her up as a character from others like illaoi for example, ireally like illaoi's champ and lore and all idk if she is a slut hetero bi or lesbian or transgender tho its not in her lore really and it doesnt matter to the game and it shouldnt. I just tried to argue about this so less people would actually care about that but more about her actual lore and abilities but everyone can do what they want ofc, so i can aswell write my heart out about how i dont like pedophiles :P I personally will play neeko for her abilities and cuz she might fit well as a jungler or mid which i play both but miss me with that gay shit. People got triggered by my text that is good, triggering people gets their attention
: The fact that you decide to argue about something so irrelevant and write an essay about it makes me sad about you.
10 minutes to release my issue with this is not bad and you even checked on it lol and triggering people is fun tbh
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Zoru (EUW)
: Is gold 2 main mid ok?
Sure man rank doesn't matter much it's attitude and having fun :)
Rioter Comments
pbpj (EUW)
: Can u handle playing with silvers who wish to learn or is it too low?
1Sole1 (EUW)
: EUW New Silver/Gold Team (Tonight!) - Community Based, Consistent Practices.
Here is a jungler, but only for Sub role :D im probably not able to practice regulary but all the other things are ok
Rioter Comments
Kaan Baba (EUW)
: Looking for Plat+ Jungler MAIN
you could actually need some elder ppl criticism... :P ( i just came here fot that)
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Valentío (EUW)
: Infliction eSports Recruiting (Diamond Players Only)
I am looking for a team ^^ Name IGN: Avánti Age: 19 Role: Jungle Rank: Diamond 5 Nationality: Germany
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Abbett (EUW)
: hi avanit, i'd be more than happy to play sup for you anytime
Ye Support is just what i need, that's my worst role :D
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
fëgü (EUW)
: Ranked Team sucht Jungler!
Hm i main Jungle, I am Platin 4 atm, 18 years old, i can speak english if needed but im German too. I doN't know if im the right pick for you due to time issues i may have but we can find that out i guess :) If you are still searching answer me here or ingame ^^
Rioter Comments
: Looking for duo mate to grind Platinum ( must have experience )
I will add u later, Ingame: InuKamì I am in Plat since beginning of season 4 or something, got much experience and want to go diamond in the next couple of months.
Rioter Comments
Stano (EUW)
: what elo are you?
Plat 4 - both season 4 and 5 i already were in plat 1 tho, but meh~
Inugamí (EUW)
: LF DuoQ partner
Rioter Comments
: Looking for friends to play normals with
Jackal UK (EUW)
: Team Ravage EU (Plat 2 Team) - LF 1 Main Jungler (Plat Minimum)
It's tempting if only i could, if u need a Back up in Roster get on me :D
Show more

Inugamí

Level 389 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion