Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
IkOerman (EUW)
: I like the general idea, i've always felt a video replay was missing from the Tribunal. _**(Riot: Hit 2 bird with 1 stone, if u save replays anyway, people should be able to view their own.)**_ > [{quoted}](name=IsmaeelH,realm=EUW,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=v9nA29mE,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-06-06T18:45:18.255+0000) > Other Features > - Reward good judges to give players a reason to do this. Riot has stated a few times before that they would not give any big _(read: usefull)_ rewards. Reason for this is that they dont want to give judges a motivation to just browse through the case as fast as possible, to gain ranks and rewards. I remember in tribunal, at a time, it was a few IP's per case, but it was so little that they were in fact negligible.
I Should of been more specific but I did want to write too much, bug the way I thought about "good judges" was as in if the punishment they suggested was close to the actual verdict they could gain XP to gain ranks bug if it was not then they would Lose XP (maybe ban them from being a judge if they get to a certain value) and higher ranked Judges would have a bigger impact on the final verdict than lower ranked Judges. It does not need to be an IP reward, maybe just A summoned Icon's like they did back in 2014 when they first released Ascension and you could Eran 3/4 different icons , each one being better and nicer than for the last achievement.
DogeRo (EUNE)
: That seems like a good idea . Nice photoshop there too xd{{champion:36}}
I don't know how to use Photoshop So I used Windows Paint XD
Ultearov (EUW)
: I don't like being negative on a good, constructive post, but couldn't this be easily abused by one person saying people deserve Bans no matter what happened?
True, but if you have 50 players review the same case it would be unlikely that one troll could make a big difference.
Rioter Comments


Level 62 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion