Teemofied (EUW)
: https://imgur.com/a/4xlhL https://imgur.com/a/JMJLn Dont Know if it worked to put the links in the post so i do it again
Looks like they're just friends and playing together. Boosting defines as exchanging currency or monetary value for services to increase one's rank.
Rioter Comments
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
>Throwback at the "insults are socially unacceptable" part. This doesn't really enlighten me on how passion and unfriendly criticism are mutually exclusive aha >And? You also aren't the one to decide how people are going to take your words. You were punished for a good reason: you broke the rules. Trying to argue against this simple concept is useless. That's exactly the point. You just said: >You wanted them to have substance Now you're saying it doesn't matter whether someone wanted them to have substance because it's not them to decide whether they do? You're switching your argument around lol Once again, I have not disputed whether I deserved the ban. Are you not understanding my words? I broke the rules. I got banned. I deserve the ban but think the rules are ridiculous, the system inconsistent and Riot's standards as encouraging a mindless, authoritarian society. That's this whole debate right now. I'm not saying that I think I shouldn't have been banned. >It doesn't matter how "minor" your offense was, when you're on your last strike before being booted out for consistent rulebreaking. That's why the reaction of the recipient of your words doesn't matter. He reported you -> you got banned. Speculating that he did it because he's emotionally frail actually reveals that you're trying to feel better about your ban by demeaning (again) the one that got you banned; you have no basis to support your speculation. Sigh. Guess I'm going to have to debunk this too. >It doesn't matter how "minor" your offense was Never said it did. Used the term minor to emphasise that insulting someone's gameplay is different to insulting someone. >He reported you -> you got banned. Yes. >Speculating that he did it because he's emotionally frail actually reveals that you're trying to feel better about your ban by demeaning (again) the one that got you banned This is another fallacy. You don't seem to understand that I have accepted my ban. I am not disputing my ban. Please stop insinuating this has anything to do with my ban. These have been my emotions on League since the requirements for a ban have slowly gotten stricter. FIrst of all, let's ask whether it's really a speculation > if someone takes substance to a single person calling them bad at a low elo, then they are unbelievably emotionally frail because obviously if I call someone bad but am the same rank as them, I am just as poor In order to feel offended by someone calling them bad they must feel insecure about having their gameplay ability called to matter. If this gameplay is called to matter by someone who is approximately the same skill as them, then it means that they are not judging the other person's ability to judge their skill, but are accepting the possibility that they have the means to, without evidence. This insinuates they are already insecure about their gameplay ability and being frail about something as absolutely arbitrary as that, unless there is a significant factor that relies on it (i.e. your career [professional players] or something else miscellaneous) they have fragility in their emotional state in accordance to said topic. A speculation still? Yes, this relies on a psychological analysis of course, which, without tests cannot be concretely evidenced. But an invalid speculation? Not in the slightest. >you have no basis to support your speculation. So there's my simplified support to my speculation. :)
: > [{quoted}](name=Joyi,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6nvNE4fX,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2018-03-30T19:39:29.217+0000) > > Nice comment {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}} Well at least you specified in the title FIRST that you were permabanned and THEN that you leave, not like a couple of jokers that a day or two ago went like "Goodbye League!" and then you open the thread and read "Ok i was permabanned...but the 10000th insult i received in the last game (of course i was banned for defending against it) after X years of playing LoL made me understand that i'm done with it so i would not have stayed a minute more anyway!!!". Yeah, such tough understanding and decision :D...
I'm mainly done with League because I guess I'm just not having fun anymore and my permaban represents that. Anything else on this thread is just like a "cherry on top" if ygm
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
>They are mutually exclusive in any group environment. Sorry, I don't understand - can you explain how so? >You wanted them to have substance. You wrote those words so that they would have substance. You don't even know if the person who reported you actually got offended, or simply reported you on the basis of your rulebreaking -- you don't get offended when a burglar robs your house, but you still report it to the police because it's breaking the law. Whether the perpetrator wants an insult to have substance does not decide whether it does. I've had "I hope your family get cancer" thrown at me countless times... they have. But this doesn't get to me at all, his insult doesn't have substance because he doesn't know me. That's factual. It'd be different if I was playing with a friend and they said it. The words I used were towards someone's gameplay ability, which is comparatively minor in comparison to my example above - if someone takes substance to a single person calling them bad at a low elo, then they are unbelievably emotionally frail because obviously if I call someone bad but am the same rank as them, I am just as poor.
: > That however, is doubtful, since despite atleast 40% of the community toxic, very few % are banned and even less, permanently ("40%" is made up statistic based on my own experiences across a range of elo). "in my experience something-something happened therefore there is no other explanation for how things work" *sigh* http://www.conservapedia.com/Black-swan_fallacy *The black-swan fallacy is an inductive fallacy that states that if something has not occurred within the speaker's experience, it cannot occur. In other words, the fallacy states that just because something has always been a certain way in the speaker's experience, it is always that way as a matter of universal principle. The example that gave its name to the fallacy is "Every swan that I have ever seen is white; therefore, there are no black swans."* https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2015/10/13/103073957-GettyImages-475064080.jpg?v=1483631044 >This is a completely straw-hat example. https://imgur.com/a/tzvZU I think you mean straw-***man*** also it isn't one. i suggest you stop using words you don't understand > as you have not read my chat logs. given your general attitude in this thread, checking out your chatlogs doesn't seem necessary >I did, at no point in either of the 2 games evidenced in my permanent ban, directly target or insult someone for a trait or mechanic that was outside of that within the game. i don't see how it's relevant wether you were rude to someone in relation to irl or lol
>i suggest you stop using words you don't understand Do you understand what you just read? The very quotation you made and are attesting to states that, _"that if something has not occurred within the speaker's experience, it cannot occur [...] always been a certain way in the speaker's experience, it is always that way as a matter of universal principle"_ Yet my very comment is inclusive of the term "("40%" is made up statistic based on my own experiences across a range of elo)". Let's focus on that shall we? The very inclusion of the acceptance that ones own statistic is made up, opens it to the possibility that it has a likelihood of being incorrect, this, akin to the fact that I have not tried to argue it as if it is factual or actually correct, completely illegitimates it from being a black-swan. >I think you mean straw-man Also, yes, you're correct. I did indeed make mistake with my reference there. However, it was understandable, was it not? Now were those your only points or do you have something else to say? "also it isn't one. i suggest you stop using words you don't understand" I've explained why it is a straw-man. The burden of proof rests in your lap, or are you going to throw around another baseless statement like you did with the black-swan fallacy? As if quoting the definition somehow further evidences it lmao
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
>No, it isn't. You want to make the person you're insulting feel bad for not being up to your standards. That's demeaning, not passion. You speak as if demeaning language and passion are mutually exclusive. >Basic human psychology disagrees with you. Hurtful words have meanings, hence why it's socially unacceptable to use them to insult people. Hurtful words have meanings, any statement does. The argument is whether they have substance and it's your choice in the matter.
: You got permabanned, I'm glad you're gone because you're toxic
Nice comment {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
>Insulting people isn't a sign of being passionate, it's a sign of being unable to control yourself. Don't mistake passion for the right to be verbally abusive because you're upset at someone. Insulting someone is a sign of being abusive. Insulting someone's work or actions can very well be a sign of passion. >You didn't get the point, didn't you? It means that the existence of preventative means doesn't suddenly make the things they're meant to prevent, legal or allowed. Like your rulebreaking - you don't get a blank card to insult people just because they insult you first. I'll quote what I said in the other comment quickly: >Why do I believe that a mute button existing excuses MINOR flaming? Because I believe that people have a an ethical right to express their emotions. I've been flamed before, I've been a "victim" as you might describe it - but I don't get angry at someone else just because they're angry at me. That would be illogical. Some random person who doesn't know me or my mum calling my mother a slut [not that I even went that far myself] - so what? A world with a filter is a world where no one can be even remotely real. If you are seeking that form of authoritarian community then I can direct you to a list of countries where you can immigrate to. >Edit; Don't get me wrong, I emphasised minor for a reason. While it's subjective where people draw the line, I absolute detest racism (or forms of discrimination) and sexual abuse comments. I believe there are limits. Being angry does not excuse innate bigotry, stupidity or extremism When looking at justification of actions, I believe the most important thing to do is to evaluate the effect of the actions on the other person. There are preventative measures to stealing, do I therefore believe stealing is fine? No, of course not. Stealing has a lasting effect, monetarily and time-wise on another person. It's dishonest. What do hurtful words do? Clearly hurtful words don't have a real value like stealing, so what do they do. Do they have a psychological one, do they make someone angry/sad? No, they don't. Someone chooses their emotional response in situations like this. "How do you choose an emotional response?" you ask? By looking at the situation with logic. This is seemingly ironic, because, if someone can choose their emotional response based off logic, then why did I make any comments at all? Great question. That's why I do not dispute my ban at all, in fact I agree with it as aforementioned. League is becoming a more and more sensitive game, and the type of players it encourages are sheep. It wants a community of sheep, similar to a few current and historical world leaders. Filtering does not encourage removal of negativity, filtering encourages avoidance of detectable negativity and a nonfreedom to criticise. League does not try to educate people who are propagators or victims of toxicity on how to deal with it, the game wants only to remove it - that is a failing system and there has been millennia of real world evidence to this.
Hansiman (EUNE)
: > Maybe I deserved the ban but to say that's because the system is doing its job would be the most fallacious and naive statement to have ever existed. How so? Together with your 14 day ban, you were told that **any** further violations on your part would net you a permanent suspension. Within 3 games, you decided to break the rules yet again. How is that the system not working? The system that punished you hands out punishments based on verbal misbehaviour, something you did. --- > game where a mute button exists, yet people can get banned for swearing. And in a world were alarms exist, it's still illegal to break into places. Just because there's a safe guard in place, doesn't mean it's ok to force people to use them. You were also not banned for swearing. You were banned for being verbally abusive towards others. That's very different.
>How so? Together with your 14 day ban, you were told that any further violations on your part would net you a permanent suspension. >Within 3 games, you decided to break the rules yet again. How is that the system not working? >The system that punished you hands out punishments based on verbal misbehaviour, something you did. I've explained in another comment. It's not that the system didn't correctly act against me, I'm saying that it doesn't correctly act against the vast majority of players. I do not believe at all that I didn't deserve the ban, even if remotely. The first thing I thought when scrolling down the game chat logs was "Yep, I deserved that. I hope the people that trolled and flamed alongside myself were also banned." That however, is doubtful, since despite atleast 40% of the community toxic, very few % are banned and even less, permanently ("40%" is made up statistic based on my own experiences across a range of elo). >And in a world were alarms exist, it's still illegal to break into places. Just because there's a safe guard in place, doesn't mean it's ok to force people to use them. This is a completely straw-hat example. The two scenarios are inherently different at risk and value and are used by people who don't have a proper example to try and create propagandised hyperbole within their point. Shall I compare picking £5 off the floor to raping someone in response? I also explained why the mute function is important when looking at the severity of verbal abuse in my reply to the first comment. Take a look if you want to see my response. >You were also not banned for swearing. You were banned for being verbally abusive towards others. That's very different. I was banned for general toxicity. I find the term "verbally abusive towards others" a little demeaning as you have not read my chat logs. And while I've uninstalled league otherwise I would show you, I can only acclaim to the statement that - I did, at no point in either of the 2 games evidenced in my permanent ban, directly target or insult someone for a trait or mechanic that was outside of that within the game. If, my friend, you consider calling someone 'bad at a game' - verbal abuse, then I can only hope you never receive a real world position of power for it would be absolutely disaster for anyone who is passionate about anything.
: > but to say that's because the system is doing its job would be the most fallacious and naive statement to have ever existed. And why is that? You broke the rules as well by insulting other players. Just because someone else is misbehaving doesn't mean you have the right to do the same. > A game where the people who are punished aren't the ones intentionally trying to lose the game. Except they are. However, detecting that kind of misconduct is rather complex, for reasons that should be obvious. You have to prove one's intent, not just look at their score. Verbal abuse, however, is different. Everything is crystal clear in one's chat log(s), hence the higher punishing rate. > A game where a mute button exists Often used as an excuse by people who have a tendency to flame. This doesn't mean you're allowed to verbally abuse others. If you have to mute someone, the damage has already been done.
>And why is that? You broke the rules as well by insulting other players. Just because someone else is misbehaving doesn't mean you have the right to do the same. Because a system that cannot effectively and equally enforce its rules and punishment system is not a functional system. Imagine a country where only 1/3 of **evidenced** criminals were punished because the other 2/3rds didn't fit into the system. >Except they are. However, detecting that kind of misconduct is rather complex, for reasons that should be obvious. You have to prove one's intent, not just look at their score. Verbal abuse, however, is different. Everything is crystal clear in one's chat log(s), hence the higher punishing rate. Your first sentence was "except they are" and then you tried to justify why they aren't as much as those who verbally abuse. You contradicted your own point. Next, >Often used as an excuse by people who have a tendency to flame. This doesn't mean you're allowed to verbally abuse others. If you have to mute someone, the damage has already been done. Maybe so. However let's look at this on another level. Why do I believe that a mute button existing excuses **MINOR** flaming? Because I believe that people have a an ethical right to express their emotions. I've been flamed before, I've been a "victim" as you might describe it - but I don't get angry at someone else just because they're angry at me. That would be illogical. Some random person who doesn't know me or my mum calling my mother a slut [not that I even went that far myself] - so what? A world with a filter is a world where no one can be even remotely real. If you are seeking that form of authoritarian community then I can direct you to a list of countries where you can immigrate to. Edit; Don't get me wrong, I emphasised minor for a reason. While it's subjective where people draw the line, I absolute detest racism (or forms of discrimination) and sexual abuse comments. I believe there are limits. Being angry does not excuse innate bigotry, stupidity or extremism
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Ìxeas (EUW)
: Sounds like V-Sync. You can disable that in video settings in-game.
unfortunately isn't :(
Rioter Comments
Aseraan (EUW)
: Solo and DQ players hear me out.
Before Dynamic Queue there was a Soloqueue/Duoqueue option and everyone complained about duoqueuing so what are you talking about lol
: Banned for laif
Just create a new account lol nothing is gonna stop my flaming xx
Larry (EUNE)
: I'm Quitting these boards
Just go on the NA boards because Riot actually engages there
: I prefer not muting players. I am a very calm person and other peoples flaming can't tilt me. So I prefer to read the flaming, with every single insult being entered in chat making me more confident that this person will get his punishment. The problem with muting or the problem that causes people not to mute is that it's not the reading of insults that upsets people, but KNOWING that someone attacked them. Those people who are easily upset by getting flamed can't just solve their problem by muting people because they feel like they have to "win" this flame war in order to safe their ego. Just not seeing the insults because you muted that person is not enough, they still know that they got attacked. Of course this is stupid/childish and only based on peoples inability to bear attacks on their ego, but it's kind of understandable. The mute function simply isn't the solution for some peoples problem. Getting a more stable ego would be.
If you can control your emotions and not respond then I think that's a very good trait to have, it makes you more mature. The problem is, half the community can't do this and feel like (as you said) they need to "win" in order to be validated.
Rioter Comments
Dainank (EUW)
: Well, I am Plat 1... but k
I just didnt see anything impressive lol, you got fed, then either the enemy missed key skillshots by being trashkids or you were fed enough that it didn't matter what they hit lol just another stomp game, I get a fair share of them as an adc main myself
Ultearov (EUW)
: TL'DR Dynamic queue may be annoying, have many, many problems, but your rank being inaccurate is not one if you play solo. AAAAnd another person whining about this. I have played Dynamic Queue with premades against premades with solo/premade vs. premade/solo and solo vs. solo. I can confidently say that when I am with solo vs. premades my teammates are individually better 95% of the time, and lanes are won by my team except sometimes when the enemy jungler decides to camp one lane. Now, teamfights are harder yes, but I rarely lose these matchups simply because by the time we get to teamfights my team is fed. The same has happened when I am matched with 3-4 man premades, where my team sucks and despite some skype coordination the enemy is just straight up better than us and we lose. Then again, I have had games where premades overpower your team or the enemy team because of superior conversation, but I see both ways happening and the system is, in my opinion, balanced. And I am Silver, thus I fall into your category of "low elo" And finally, as a solo Q player I have a 62% win rate as SUPPORT main. People who b*tch that premades win more just want a reason to bitch. It used to be "Im in Elo Hell!" now it's "Im against premades!" Just look at yourself, reflect on what you could have done better. No one will disagree if I took you and replaced you with a platinum player (assuming you are "low elo - bronze, silver, gold") the game would have been won, despite the enemies being teamed and your team solo'd. Why? Plat players are mostly far superior to you (no offence, they are far superior to me too xD ) and thus can climb by carrying. **If you deserve higher ranking you will still climb in the new system.** It may take a little longer for some because of luck/unluck depending on the communication levels of premades in your game, but over 1000 games it'll still be about 500 games that were yours to lose (your team is better) and 500 yours to win (your team is worse), all that matters is how YOU play. If you are above your elo you will end with 501-499 at the absolute worst, and thus still climb (without counting the games you will lose after ranking up which cannot drop you)
Wrong. That system of 50% winrate would only work in a system that is consistent. Matchmaking include a RNG factor and is therefore luck based to some extent. Even in the old system, a 50% wi nrate over 1000000 games was not guaranteed due to the presence of duo queue, although it was significantly less prominent to change. Duo-queue DOES have an impact in this sense. Riot literally released statistics and ADMITTED in their discussion that if you premade you can get boosted, EASILY, up to a certain level (usually high plat/low diamond is where premade boosting peaks at the absolute max), boosting to gold is incredibly easy through the premade system as the lower elo you go, the more voice chat is effective as long as you have a reasonable idea of what you're doing. Tl;dr - System was never perfect and never gauranteed any win rate due to the presence of RNG and duo-queue. New system makes it even worse with fluctuations of 40-55% win rate as a solo player depending on your enemy team and your team. leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/features/dynamic-queue-and-future-league "softened" statistics for dynamic queue win rate (e.g. not showing specific win rates for scenarios such as 5 premade vs 5 solo): leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/features/dynamic-queue-and-future-league
: Premades & Balance
Riot already released statistics saying that 4/5 premades have a 55-60+% win rate vs lesser premade teams (i.e. soloqueue/duo/trio-players) lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll they just cant admit it's a broken system so they're trying to fix it by "balancing mmr" so that if you're premade you get put vs higher elo players instead of just putting soloqueue/duo back which actually works lol
Dainank (EUW)
: Platinum top laner plays Caitlyn...
"platinum" "high elo" lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Illazuel (EUW)
: +1 for explaining it so that I didn't have to. Nice explanation too. Would also add that riot encourages the toxicity by allowing players to taunt and laugh at each other via game play.
25% of the problems in league of legends can be fixed by simply adding a voice communication feature like cs:go or overwatch which allows you to mute people etc
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
Logical counter-counterargument: Riot has a system where they put 5 random players on one team in an extremely competitive environment with no voice chat or ease of communication aside from typing and expect them to be nice to each other even when 1 player sabotages 40 minutes of the other 4 player's time?
: League of Legends is sh*t.
I think you're mistaken, the game is just that, it's a game and if you don't like it, that's fine. I like League of Legends. I fucking detest Riot Games on the other hand.
Zero000 (EUW)
: How did he know that the other had a dc too if he isn't ingame anymore?
Also it turns out it was riot's fault, otherwise enemy teamw ouldnt have got loss prevented and disconnected and i wouldnt have got half lp
Zero000 (EUW)
: How did he know that the other had a dc too if he isn't ingame anymore?
because before you fully dc, it says "x champion has disconnected" but ofc i had 12k ms and the "reconencting" screen so i couldnt move
Rioter Comments
PhantomVII (EUNE)
: 6.11 Low leveled players in high elo NORMAL games
"high elo" "gold and platinum" lol what
: Remove armor pene/magic pene from items.
You're probably not very good with tanks if you dont know how to play one correctly.
: Anyone Jelly ?
what am i supposed to be looking at
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: when it comes to competitiveness, It only matters in things like tournament level gameplay. There people do have voice communication. Dota 2 and CS:GO are good examples of how it is used in non-professional manner. People shout, people flame, people play horrible music, people might want to communicate properly but their accent or mic make it very hard to understand. People use the voice chat instead of TS3 etc. and it annoyis people and people use their own languages even though no-one would understand. Sure, add voice chat. But allow the usage of it to plat+ players only. This way it is more likely to be used as it is supposed to be used.
But that's the thing. Don't want to hear it? Mute them. Easy.
Rioter Comments
: Change Vayne's %HP true damage to scale it with her maximum AD
this is such a bad idea considering vayne isn't meant to scale with ad but attack speed in order to proc the true damage quickly. It'd jsut change the vayne meta to max Q first again.
: 300-400Euroes I have no problem about OS No need for periferals No need for monitor other games would be World of warcraft,Smite,overwatch ( if possible)
This build is slightly less than 400 euros. Replace/Add an extra HDD when you have money as 250gb isnt a lot but should last you till then. For some reason, Seagate barracudas werent showing so I put in the second best (western dig) Case isnt included and may cost an extra 30 euros. Optical drive isnt included so you may need. No way you're going to fit an OS into the price range so if you want to keep the cost down to around 400 euros then torrent it to a usb or use an existing key of yours. This build is pushing your budget and isn't too great but I put in one stick of 8gb ram as you can keep it for your next pc and the difference between dual porting is minute cpu/gpu mix should last you a few years with graphics ranging from low to high dependant on the game. Will easily max out league and overwatch. Should do pretty well dependant on the zone youre in on max wow graphics. (the trouble with fps in wow is based on entities not actual graphical requirements). PSU wattage is low but tried to keep price down, should be enough for this build but you will need to buy a high power one if you want to add or upgrade pretty much anything PCPartPicker part list: http://de.pcpartpicker.com/p/Fwyv8d Price breakdown by merchant: http://de.pcpartpicker.com/p/Fwyv8d/by_merchant/ CPU: AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor (€98.82 @ Amazon Deutschland) Motherboard: MSI 970A-G43 ATX AM3+ Motherboard (€66.76 @ Amazon Deutschland) Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory (€27.00 @ Amazon Deutschland) Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 250GB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (€39.90 @ Amazon Deutschland) Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Video Card (€110.94 @ Mindfactory) Power Supply: Corsair Builder 430W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply (€44.20 @ Mindfactory) Total: €387.62 Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-21 02:19 CEST+0200
Çhaòs (EUW)
: How to play Taliyah.
: Ezreal still owerpowerd?
Play Lucian: Deal more damage. Have more range. Have bigger prescence. Have more mobility if u use your aa/e combo along with some cd reduc
: I Wanna buy a new computer at low price , any spec recommendations to handle league?
What's your budget? OS version preference? Do you need peripherals? Do you need a monitor? How lenient is your budget? Which _other_ games?
: Season 6 matchmaking unfair as it can be.
: Then go {{champion:67}} (6.11) {{item:3078}} {{item:3153}} {{item:3006}} {{item:3026}} {{item:3022}} {{item:3071}} tanks wont be able to kill her to easy but she will still hurt like hell on tanks.
That build is disgusting. Bork/greaves: decent TF/FM: Acceptable GA: Eh BC: Why
: I started playing in early season 4. s4 was def the best season league has ever had. Now it feels like riot are only focusing on making as much money as they can before the hype of this game is over, because trust me it will not last. I can understand that Riot wants to succeed as a company but i get so frustrated when they cant even maintain the game properly. In the latest two seasons there has been so much problems every time a new patch comes out. As a (very well) paying customer u should at least get compensated when they cant deliver their product. It feels bad to say but i dont like Riot at all, and league is not what it once was.
As someone who's been maining adc since s3. I vote for s3 because adcs were op 8)
l Jay l (EUNE)
: So you want to shut down a champion with a button. You don't want do dodge or something, you want just to press a button and kill Fizz or Zed. How it would be if there was a spell that stun you for 5 seconds and you can't aa, unfair right ? + Adc are made to be late game monsters, they need protection, as and ADC you shouldn't be able to go mid or top and kill the enemy champion just by aa. You don't want a fair game , you want a game where ADC destroy everything , anytime.
A champion which isn't dependant on his R to kill a carry (just Q+E is enough)? A champion which doesn't have much out play potential (if any)? I want the game to be fair and for me to stand a chance. Unfortunately, aside from lucian, adcs are the most underpowered role rn.
: 6.11: they add AP rations to marksmen, too. zhonya's will be built on any carry :D on ezreal, koggy and corki, you might even start building it now.
Hopefully they also give us a 90% damage damage reduction/cc nullifying malphite shield like malzahar too!
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
tolistnl (EUNE)
: riot has banned my acc because using overwolf.
Show more

Joyi

Level 44 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion