: Kai'sa Runes Bug (?)
I think I will post this on this NA Boards aswell and update here if I get an answer there for anyone interested.
Rioter Comments
GLurch (EUW)
: Would banning him result in much of a change? Of course, for you, it'd be good to know. Which also reminds me, they do not inform you if they take action, since they want people to have some privacy. Anyways, it'd be one person more banned, but there would still be thousands running around. For that, they need the system. If the system can't catch them, it's all useless, since the Riot Support can't be trusted to manually punish all of them either. It would just result in another tribunal, this time run by Rioters, which would bring in a lot of downsides. There's also to everything the previously explained human factor, which would very likely result in false positives, which Riot can definitely not afford when it comes to punishments such as bans. I'm not claiming the current system doesn't make false positives either, but the numbers are very low compared to anything a system run by humans could ever achieve.
I didn't talk about the flaws in the report system. I talked about a troll not being banned after about a MONTH of potentially ruining games for others ,too. He didn't run it down mid like the most intentional feeder do, but fought back and sometimes even got a kill. So maybe this game I reported could be used to make the system better.
GLurch (EUW)
: Intentional feeding does not get chat restrictions as a punishment. That would be pretty... pointless. Intentional feeders get a 14 day ban as their first punishment and a permanent ban as their second, when they are detected. That's where the problem lies though. It's no secret Riots system isn't always good at detecting intentional feeding. Sometimes, it detects them upon the first time they do it, other times it takes 30 games or so. One of the main problems regarding this is, that Riots system learns using reports by the community, which means fake reports for intentional feeding when someone was just bad could mislead the system. To not instantly give these players who'd be falsely detected a 14 day ban, Riot has to be careful. When people end up getting punished on mistake, it supposedly creates a lot more attention than when someone is not punished at all for breaking them. Also, when you report something to the Riot Support, often (not always), they just leave the judgment to the system. There are multiple reasons for this, such as that humans can also make mistakes and maybe miss something, which could lead to problems for them, that I don't think they easily have access to something like a ban button or that manual punishments would be like not trusting their coworkers. Also, the length of chat restrictions was repeatedly tested by Riot. Long chat restrictions, such as for hundreds or even thousands of games, up to the point where they're endless, don't work. Short chat restrictions work the best for the majority of the people. Long chat restrictions just lead some people to get their anger out in another way, like trolling, which leads back to the other problem I already mentioned. Those people that would resort to trolling and such instead would usually be those people who'd be unaffected by short chat restrictions and instead end up getting 14 day bans as well, meaning, this way of handling them is way more effective.
I literally took 30 minutes of my life, to make a video of the player feeding, report it to the support, then wait like 2 days to get told in the response "yes this is intetionallly feeding" and still nothing happened. Thats's not a flaw in the report system, that's either laziness or not caring anymore, which is one of the reasons I'm disappointed, too. Of course it's a problem for the system that people abuse the report system to vent frustration, but in this case it's clear and not reliant on the system anymore, because delibrately chose to go the long way to make sure this person gets banned. Of course their is no such thing as a "bann button", but it should be in the realm of possibilities to bann this person in like a day after this incident.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: maybe write the support :) And ask them friendly if they could ask someone working for rito
> [{quoted}](name=PwnedAkkon ,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=G8YdvYOa,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-01-18T17:33:30.098+0000) > > maybe write the support :) And ask them friendly if they could ask someone working for rito Might do that, but once i hit the 2499.
Rioter Comments
markos1970 (EUNE)
: best champion vs LeBlanc at mid
Zed is really good against her. You just need to know, how to play the matchup. I learned it by watching Bjergsen play Zed vs. LB. You should be able to find Gameplays of him as Zed vs. LB.
Rioter Comments

Käsewiener

Level 174 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion