: It is in patch notes. new skarner passive. riot said loads about this
For someone who doesn't play skarner, i had no clue what they did.
Rioter Comments
: Ok so you're contradicting my experiece of solo play with your experience of playing with the same people? No offense but I do believe I have bigger numbers to cruch than you. Also it's "easy" to be sportsmanlike when you're with friends, or when you're a streamer and hundreds/thousands are wtching you... when you're solo and no one you know is judging you, you just don't care. Especially since (at least in lower elos) no one has mercy, so after a few times everyone gets the habit that you should take whatever win you can get because other will (almost) never return the favor if you're nice.
Nowhere in my comment will you read anything that would take you to infer that my intentions are to 'contradict' you. My only intention is to share a different perspective in a group case AND in my individual case, i do not get happy with afks in soloQ.
Samaritan (EUW)
: I do not understand this punishment system...
You should know that riot has an afk detection system, so, even if you're not best friends with your team mates and they are flaming you until your third generation, i strongly suggest you follow the following steps: step one: say nothing step two: mute'em all step three: find new objectives that might turn the game enjoyable for you until it ends Personally, in those rare occasions i get those kind of teams, i wont even mute them, i just ignore them and keep doing my game until i excel and get the best score out of our team. During this, they will flame you in /all chat and beg for reports. Most of the times, the enemy team will honor me, and report them instead. You just need to be better than them.
: 0% of the statistics are 100% accurate (including this one, maybe) Doesn't mean there is no truth behind it. Doesn't mean that you can just reply with stupid sarcasm (I don't mean to attack anybody, that's just how humple's answer is : it's sarcasm and it's stupid). You sould try using some reasoning, would help a lot. The least one should do is say his experience contradicts the given figure, at least this kind of answer brings some information to the discussion. The one I gave is accurate enough regarding MY experience, which covers a few thousand games, and my on ELOs that cover bronze and silver (wich includes 60% or 70% of the player population IIRC, If you kind sirs allow me for an approximate statistic) Your experience may be different, but mine is pretty clear. And I'l say 90% of the time (approximate figure from my own experience, once again) : - people are happy when there is an AFK in the enemy team, most particularily in ranked - worse, when there is an intentional feeder thay are happy to take whatever kill/assist on him instead of just let him suicide on a tower - if a long time AFK come back, they keep focusing him for easy kills, even if he's underleveld and undergeared So I will repeat myslef : instead of oppinions, give me some PROOF that what I said is wrong. Or maybe you have the same issues understanding the difference between "proof" and "oppinion" as you have understand the difference between "reasoning" and "sarcasm"
Can't put my finger on those numbers but i can tell you this: I play, normally, with the same group of 5 friends. Most of the times, we're 3 players playing together. We're players from bronze, silver and gold. We do not enjoy a game with an afk. We do not enjoy an easy game. We strive to get a nice balanced game until the very last second of it. When an enemy team has an afk, the game loses it's interest (even though sometimes the remaining 4 put up quite the fight, and we even had ocasions where our team just surrendered to give them the victory). Sometimes, we get the afk. We try our best to win the game anyways (done before, might happen again, we never know). -- Now, i can understand why a new/younger player might be happy when the enemy has an afk. They're hunting for their first wins, they are farming ip for their next champion, so it's quite understandable why that happens.
: > Replaced is wrong. Its used for the time being as a substitute till the new tribunal gets active this year. Please do tell me how it really is a mistake to say "replace" instead of "substitute". It's basically the same meaning. > Well i doubt i need to comment on how judgemental you are.... First I don't see how this is a "misinformation" I am spreading. So instead of answering my question you are replying with my behavior wich is off topic. Nice rhetoric skill, but that won't get you anywhere. Also, I'm still less than most if the people that frequent this subforum. Most of you are lecturing anybody that come here about the rules. When we try to discuss how we MAY improve those rules and how they are implemented, your only answers are "the rules are the rules". As if we didn't have the right to discuss them. SO what's the use of this board? Just reminding people of the rules? In that case just put a message with the complete rules and lock the board. Would do a better job than allowing judgmental jerks to go lecturing and talking as if they were some kind of official judges. Their arrogance make a poor job at convincing people that the rules are good and must be followed. Also, you may want to ask me how I can be so certain that i'm less judgmental than the people I talk about : At least I read a decent amount of their oppinions to forge my oppinion on their behavior. Were they have been spiting their arrogance since the first post I ever put on this forum. > And then we have this here where you are short of attacking me for not understanding my point: Once again I fail to see how I am spreading misinformation. But at this point I understand you reply more for the sake of stating why you don't LIKE me and not to proof that I was WRONG and that you guys are just RIGHTFULLY CORRECTING me. Well I can't say that I'm surprised anyway. Now to answer your point, even if it's off-topic : Puting the important part of a message in caps is atacking? Are you the kind of guy that reports for flame whenever someone tells you in chat to stop doing something (like "stop going solo")? > You are very agressive, quick to judge and you don´t properly think about what others write. Baseline I'ld say you are the one quick to understand a message as an attack. The guy I called out as a stalker was answering the majority of my messages when I decided to take action. You jump on the assumption that I'm attacking you from one message that isn't even patricularily agressive. Funny then you dare to say that I am the one quick to judge. You don't know how many messages I've read before I "judged" this or that. But anyway, at this point I have reason to think try to use whatever element goes in favor of your oppinion without taking the time to think a little bit deeper and see if there isn't another way to look at things. And then I am the one that don't think properly of what other write. Ok so do you actuallt think you're in my head? Know ecactly what are my though processes before saying what I've said? Are you some kind of "profiler"? Caus I think you should just stop acting like it, or at least not take your assumptions on me as certainties. > Thats why i think that you are not really someone that should shout "stalker". Especially if its untrue. How much fo this do you KNOW, is true or untrue? Your opinion is truth? I asked for proof that I was spreading misinformation. Your aswer is basically "I don't like your oppinion and how you express it that why we stalk you". Think you're gonna convince me that you guys are justified in your actions?
> Also, I'm still less than most if the people that frequent this subforum. Most of you are lecturing anybody that come here about the rules. When we try to discuss how we MAY improve those rules and how they are implemented, your only answers are "the rules are the rules". As if we didn't have the right to discuss them. SO what's the use of this board? Just reminding people of the rules? > > In that case just put a message with the complete rules and lock the board. Would do a better job than allowing judgmental jerks to go lecturing and talking as if they were some kind of official judges. Their arrogance make a poor job at convincing people that the rules are good and must be followed. > > Also, you may want to ask me how I can be so certain that i'm less judgmental than the people I talk about : At least I read a decent amount of their oppinions to forge my oppinion on their behavior. Were they have been spiting their arrogance since the first post I ever put on this forum. Unfortunately, many are more focused in judging anyone that posts in these boards, than be unbiased and simply try to reply with usefull information.

Mindroot

Level 30 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion