Nitrocean (EUW)
: Come back when you get annoyed by the item system.
The item system is fine, just needs more cards and more variety, which they are going to add!
: Just buggy, games can also last pretty long, like 40-60 mins. There's not really a fast option.
Yeah it is a bit buggy, still pretty good though!
: You know that you'll be able to play only on weekends. Everyday costs money. And the cheapest package is around 40$ if I'm not mistake. =)
Incorrect. There's no cost, it's not only on weekends as I've played otday and watched streams yesterday and the day before of people playing Paragon. Cheapest package is $20, and you can get in free if you stalk twitch chats like I did anyway.
: I got it, it's alright. it has problems.
Such as? They can't be too detrimental to gameplay, what I've seen on stream looks preeety good ^^
Rioter Comments
: I think it's always interesting to see how people gladly take full responsibility for any success but once a failure is to be stood in for they are quick to blame the universe and everyone else. (regardless of whether the universe making god dragon did or did not stomp them)
: Evelynn Sketch
That's bloody good.
: If you can shout at a dog when it's bad, reward it when it's good
People as a rule focus on negative things over positive things, especially if they can use to it direct the blame at them and avoid responsability for a loss.
Exoll (EUW)
: I understand. How would you suggest me to change the title into?
Perhaps 'New YouTube channel' or 'Starting my YouTube channel' would be a bit better, but to be honest you're unlikely to get much of a response on here anyway :/
: Worst april's 1st ever
What annoys me is that it's not even done well, it just looks like a cheap photoshop job.
alurosu (EUNE)
: I see. I'll think about this. Thanks. :D
No problem, as I read back therough my comment I hope I wasn't too harsh xD
: Thanks for watching and giving feedback. Ill get rid of the intro, i wasnt exactly happy with it either. Speeding up 4x would make the fps too low to handle for my laptop and i wouldnt be able to talk about certain scenarios, so any other ideas to shorten the video?
Well, other than getting a decent PC (which would cost around £300 - £400), my suggestion would be that you could cut the clips to show only interesting parts, adding in less interesting parts when you want to talk about something and focus more on that than what's happening in the gameplay.
CiPu KING (EUW)
: SoloQ moments
Lol, nice clips, entertaining to watch :) Are you looking to make a successful YouTube channel?
Exoll (EUW)
: Promoting my YouTube channel! :)
For some reason people don't like the word 'promoting', they relate it to sellouts and attention seekers - I'd for go for something different next time (I'm going to check out your channel anyways)
Rahmiesk (EUW)
: The ways of Malphite Support
It was alright, but there weren't really any awesome plays, the sound effects were repetitive and go annoying (you don't need to put sound effects on _everything_), and your build wasn't even full tank xD
0NeDESIRE (EUNE)
: My First LOL Montage. This time we have FULL AP Hecarim. Watch and Enjoy
Excellent editing, intro was a bit long but other than that it was really good. AP Hecarim was also a good choice as it's fairly uncommon and not seen as much as something like Full AP Malphite or Full AP Zac. Are you going for a channel similar to Calbel's or UberDanger's? It could work, but full AP/AD/Tank builds are already well known and the idea isn't very original - you;d have to think of something special to make yours different. Finally, your YouTube page is pretty bad - I know it's your first video but you should update it with basic things like an about page, have a little logo or something and it will look much better. Also, the video seems to have uploaded twice so you might want to check that! I'll subscribe and see what things you decide to do next :)
alurosu (EUNE)
: I created my own Big Plays series
The editing is excellent, but the gameplay is mediocre at best. 4 average plays and Talon last hitting 4 people at the end - very dull to watch to be honest. Maybe focus on quality rather than quantity - if you can't do a good video a week, maybe do one every 2 weeks or try to get more footage. Plus, the idea is already overused and unoriginal - you're very unlikely to be popular as there are just other channels that do it better and already have hundreds of thousands of subscribers. Type 'top plays lol' into YouTube and you'll find 3 or 4 really popular channels like Protatomonster, iFunzio and OPLOLReplay doing exactly what you're doing.
: Winning a 4v5 - a new youtuber
An intro isn't very important when you're just starting off, but if you're going to have one, please change it. It's so loud and obnoxious, which just annoys people and makes them not want to watch your video. Secondly, the video is too slow. There's gaps in between the speaking, lots of 'um's and 'err's, and it's too long. If you look at popular League Youtubers - Sp4zie, SivHD, Foxdrop, their videos are all around 3 - 8 minutes. People normally don't have the attention span to watch a 20 minute video, so if you want to commentate over a gameplay you're better off speeding it up more than 2x. That way you don't have to talk as much to fill so many gaps.
aNACÓNDa (EUNE)
: You have any weird lag spikes!!? UPVOTE & COMMENT
Rioter Comments
: Well, why is it called feminism then? The word itself emphasizes women. [Egalitarianism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism) is much better to be honest.
Because the female gender is the one being oppresed - sure, there may be some inequality towards men, but it's negligable compared to the oppresion towards females. Therefore it's a movement that supports women being equal to men - feminism. If men were being oppresed, perhaps it would be called 'menism' or something similar. Egalitarianism also works, but is less widely used.
Infernape (EUW)
: They have that connotation for a reason. Some reasons including the current legal definition of rape in the US/UK that excludes men, the perpetuation of false claims as fact, the push for unequal sentencing etc.
I don't understand what you mean, can you explain?
: > [{quoted}](name=rebelsAgainstg0d,realm=EUW,application-id=yTagKVTg,discussion-id=iyJv1VKh,comment-id=00010000000100000001,timestamp=2016-03-28T17:34:58.752+0000) > > Well that's what it's **meant** to mean. With today's feminists (not all of course) they want more rights for themselves than men. Nope, that's what you call either an extreme third-wave feminist, a "feminazi" or not a feminist at all. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
Thank you, someone who understands! Feminists have such negative connatations, which is completely wrong and people misunderstanding the term.
: > [{quoted}](name=Night of Hades,realm=EUW,application-id=yTagKVTg,discussion-id=iyJv1VKh,comment-id=000100000001000000000000,timestamp=2016-03-28T17:07:57.975+0000) > > Equal rights activits are people striving for equal rights between men and women, which is the same as what I put before. Besides, feminists haven't changed - people just claim they're feminists when they're not. Here's an analogy: > > Feminists are people who support gender equality. Some 'feminists' want women to be superior. People are angry and now believe feminism is just women wanting to be superior. > Footballers are people who play football. Some footballers stop playing football and start playing tennis instead. People are angry and say footballers are just people who play tennis. > > Does that make sense? No, because footballers will always be people who play football, the same way feminists will always be people who support equal rights between men and women - that doesn't change. I'm not saying people don't use feminism as an excuse to try and make women superior to men, but those who do aren't feminists by any definition. alrighty then let me put it in another way, i dont really care.
That's fine by me, but you did say 'feel free to correct me', and I simply took up the offer :)
: > [{quoted}](name=Night of Hades,realm=EUW,application-id=yTagKVTg,discussion-id=iyJv1VKh,comment-id=0001000000010000,timestamp=2016-03-28T15:23:54.554+0000) > > Feminists are literally people supporting equal rights between men and women. they used to be, that word have been corrupted, i call them what they really are equal rights activists. either way im not a politician so all this politically correctness is not my forte, but im sure people understand my point. if not feel free to correct me.
Equal rights activits are people striving for equal rights between men and women, which is the same as what I put before. Besides, feminists haven't changed - people just claim they're feminists when they're not. Here's an analogy: Feminists are people who support gender equality. Some 'feminists' want women to be superior. People are angry and now believe feminism is just women wanting to be superior. Footballers are people who play football. Some footballers stop playing football and start playing tennis instead. People are angry and say footballers are just people who play tennis. Does that make sense? No, because footballers will always be people who play football, the same way feminists will always be people who support equal rights between men and women - that doesn't change. I'm not saying people don't use feminism as an excuse to try and make women superior to men, but those who do aren't feminists by any definition.
: Believe in equal rights. Not feminists.
Feminists are literally people supporting equal rights between men and women.
Rioter Comments
: Well, I personally would build: {{item:3174}} (Even vs AD because the mana regen is superior to {{item:3165}} {{item:3285}} / {{item:3157}} (eg. vs Zed) {{item:3089}} {{item:3157}} / {{item:3285}} (whichever you don't have yet) {{item:3135}} / {{item:3151}} and {{item:1331}} somewhere in between it all, preferably in the mid game, but the enchantment in the late game somewhere. I would only get liandries if they were very tanky - for example, if they had 3 tanky champions (eg. {{champion:89}} supp, {{champion:32}} jungle and {{champion:36}} top. This gives 40% CDR (with masteries), some %mpen and a little MR, and gives her plenty of MS. It also gives more AP than Morellonomicon at full build. For runes I would take **magicpen marks**, health/**armor seals** (depending on lane opponent, although I just go with armor), **AP glyphs** (I just prefer extra damage over defences, so you could take MR if you see fit) and **AP quints**. My masteries would be 21/0/9, taking the standard 21 in offense, and in utility: - Phasewalker (1 sec off recall) - Fleet of foot x3 (1.5% MS) - Scout (15% range on trinkets) - Summoner's insight (summoner spells reduced CD by 10%) - Alchemist (durations of potions and elixirs increased by 10%) I don't find biscuits very useful, especially out of the laning phase when you won't really buy pots. Alchemist is still nice though for when you buy that Elixir of Sorcery. The one for longer buffs isn't really helpful if you don't get blue often, and you'll have max CDR with this build by mid game anyway, with a sufficient amount of mana regen. This is just how I would balance my MR, CDR and magicpen, and also have a load of AP ^^ What do you think?
I'm still referring to this whenever I go to play Lux xD
Saugisz (EUNE)
: Improving
Always play carry champions, and do your best to carry. Assume your team are dumb, and control the game as much as possible and have a large impact. I don;t really like to do it this way either, but a lot of people in Bronze and Silver too are just so braindead it's unbelievable. I'm Bronze 4 as well, just playing mid/top champions like Fiora, Kindred, Azir, Xin Zhao, Ezreal (a bit weird but Ez mid is my main).
314exeexe (EUNE)
: That doesnt really solve the problem if i want to show my team what i would like to pick for team playing purposes
That onyl really matter is plat/diamond elo or higher, my which time I would hope the players have half a brain. Besides, this can't happen that often sooo...
314exeexe (EUNE)
: Suggestion for the new champ select
Too complex, the system is okay as it is, but it's just bad team mates and being mean that's the problem. If you're having this problem often, just don't say who you're planning to play at the start of the game. They don't know, they can't ban. Problem solved :)
: If you can't keep attention in champ select for couple of minutes, how do you expect me to believe you can keep focus in game that last 20 to 50 minutes? I much rather swap you out for someone who stays focused. The 'lock in' is an AFK check. And you know what would happen if they shortened the time to, say, 20 seconds? It would be people like you, whining on the boards how short and quick the champion select is.
A couple of minutes? Fine. 15 minutes? No. In game, there's lots of things going on an important things to keep track of, lots of action etc. I'll be on the ball then, trying my best. Champ select isn't the same as in game. And I'm not whining at all, I'm simply making a suggestion that would improve the current state of champ select. It doesn't need to be 20 seconds, 25 -30 seconds would be just, with perhaps 10-15 seconds at the start and 5 - 10 seconds once all picked.
Micha9696 (EUW)
: Why does noone play Darius jungle?
* Heal on Q only works v champions * Has to be close to CC opponents * Easily kited * No mobility * Low base damages makes him extremely easy to kill early on with invades * Low base damages means very slow early clears Basically, he won't ever get close enough to anyone to CC them and is very weak early - if you don't want to play a ganking jungler, which Darius most certainly would not be, then there are much better farming/control junglers.
: Well I mean.... Its a reasonable request, I don't see why it wouldn't be made a thing. It just seems kind of silly though, when just paying a small amount of attention - adjusting your eyes slightly to the left and seeing the declared picks. They're right there.
: Because if you are not paying attention in champ select, i will assume you would not pay attention in game.
People would pay attention in champ select if they didn't give so much time for everything - 35 seconds to declare what you might play? 40 bloody seconds for each ban? Another 40 seconds to pick? Then, finally, another 40 seconds after all of this for what?? Game strategy? You don't even know what lanes they're going, and you can decide all that in game anyway. All that ever happens is 'glhf' and then more waiting. Dude, champ select can last over 9 minutes, and you wonder why people don't want to pay attention for the whole time? Not to mention the pointless lock in mechanic that means it takes forever to get through the champ select, as people always forget to do it. I'd say I easily wait 10 - 15 minutes to get through the champ select and into the game, and I'm only low elo. For higher elo players they wait like, half an hour.
SIEGE2UK (EUW)
: New champion Select Problem
Yeah having to lock in is stupid, I'd much rather have one less ban or just have the champion the player is hovering over as a ban, the mechanic is pointless and just ends up in half hour queue times, especially at higher elo.
Shadòw (EUW)
: still, it happens that you even ban first picks pick intend
Yeah, and if they're not last pick, you can still make the mistake with the other 3 players. If you see they're last pick and want to play a champion you'd rather ban, then go ahead, ban it. But if they're like first pick and you haven;t seen who they want to play, by mistake, there's no reason not to have it. I doesn't cause any harm!
Ronker (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Night of Hades,realm=EUW,application-id=ln3nNJrX,discussion-id=wTucktzf,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-02-05T16:54:54.057+0000) > > Why not have a warning pop up when you try to ban a champion that someone in your team has declared they want to play? I've mistakenly banned champions like Graves/Tahm without noticing my team's declared picks. Just makes sense to add a warning to let you know they've picked them, I think it would be a nice improvement tot he champ select :) How about you pay attention before pressing ban, you have like 30 sec to review your choice before u submit
Yes but if you don't, by mistake, this can prevent it. There's no reason not to have it, it doesn't cause any harm or have any negatives.
Emillie (EUW)
: I mean you could just look at what they declared.
Yes but if you don't, by mistake, this can prevent it. There's no reason not to have it, it doesn't cause any harm or have any negatives.
Fransiee (EUW)
: Definitely, this should be a thing. Like a blue outline when you select the champion or something like that.
Rioter Comments
: At risk of getting banned, looking for software to disable the ENTER-buttons on my keyboard
Everytime you go to type something negative, think: Will this help the situation at all? If not, Ctrl + A, delete.
: RIVEN SPEEDART | League of Legends Banner by RektboiHD
Interesting, original, and the end result was very professional. I seriously think you might be able to use this as a basis for your YouTube channel! The name 'Rektboi' is a bit cringy and certainly makes it less professional, however - if you were to show off your work or your website to an employer or company I think they might be a little less impressed. But overall, a very solid video with nice backing music and interesting content. Perhaps you could make a bit of money by selling the edits, or just giving them out for free and asking for donations? You certainly have the skills to become more popular on YouTube! Subscribed, best of luck in the future :)
: Overclocking------RIP fps
Don't do it if it doesn't work, you don't even need that good a framerate to play league. And a 125GB HDD? I doubt it.
: Role selection - some small features
I feel like there needs to be something in the boards that separates the humour, news and QQ threads from actual suggestions that could be implemented in the game and improve it. Just something that shows Riot has noticed and may be considering it ^^ Too many good ideas are just lost in the big jumble of threads :(
Rioter Comments
Mikez (EUW)
: What To do when you have fed and your "friends" complain at you
Did you go 5 premade with your friends, or people you don't know? If it's the second, then it's basically solo queue. Friends won't complain at you (only jokingly), they'll help you and offer tips and advice so you improve. They don;t sound much like friends to me.
: What do you guys think about Talon?
He's very snowbally - if you get kills early, you can carry easily and finish the game quickly. If you don't you become weaker late game, but can probably still assassinate their ADC.
Rioter Comments
: Looking for people who would be interested in joining a "Youtubish team"!!
I wanted to start my own channel, got a new PC and everything, but then school work started getting heavy so I left it for now. But if you're just looking for someone to play with, to talk and do funny teams comps, then I'd love to join. I'm only silver III, but I don't really play ranked much (as it's preseason and I only got my new PC recently). I love doing weird off meta stuff though, my favourites being AP Xin, Quinn top and hybrid Ezreal. However, I'd like to play games with you for a little while first before I do teamspeak and stuff, and hopefully the friendship won't break down and just go to nothing like it does with a lot of people on League. I'm 16, have a decent mic (I think) and am always happy to help wherever possible. I actually have 2 accounts, so I don't know how it'll work (do you mind having to add both?), but if you see this at the moment I'm probably playing around with Azir, who I have on my other account: Nightlock64 I hope you consider me, and contact me if you want to want to play! No one my friends were very enthusiastic about YT, so hopefully I can make some who are!
Show more

Night of Hades

Level 44 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion