Drda (EUNE)
: Shh ekko main
Lolwut? You accuse me of protecting the overloaded, or waht?
Eldian (EUNE)
: Nerf %%%%ing Ekko.
> stun for no %%%%ing reason increased from 1,75 to 2.25. a %%%%ing 2.25 stun at level 1. You have so much time to leave his circle of stun. It should pay of with something at least, don't you think so? As for the rest... Yes, Ekko is a very overloaded champion, who can deal you a ton of damage, apply CC, tank several turret hits and then teleport away, healing up to 100% HP. On start he was even more annoying than Yasuo.
Gerbster (EUW)
: This would be a great QOL addition! Having to click click click ect gets a little tiresome.
I wonder, will they ban you, if you use macros here? :D
Bæka (EUW)
: Exchange all tokens to BE
Yep! [Forge] [Forge all] Those are two buttons we need.
Kazasumi (EUW)
: problem is thats physical violence. this is about league of legends. a game thats supposed to be fun and games. learn from the mistakes in a game by playing vs better people. dont start crying about people beating you in a game just because you suck. when you start a game you know they can potentially kick the living shit out of you in game, and you can do the same to them. difference is most people brag about it when they do the kicking and cry on forums and/or make impossible/extreme comparisons to try and make a point thats really not there.
It is no problem, really. Physical violence is just a more understandable thing. Let's take another game. Let's take chess. And in the chess federation you've got ratings and rules that prevent grossmeisters playing against newbies unless they both choose to do so with their eyes open. That's healthy. And forcefully stomping those who're miles below your level (specially hiding your real rating to get another easy win, which is the case of smurfing), is not. Let's take football, if you like. World champions do not go anonymously to a small local country football clubs to beat the newbies 22/0.
: What would you call a reasonable answer to his question? He didn't even asked if it SHOULD be punishable, he just asked if someone gets punished after getting reported for smurfing. I could have just said "No." if that's what you call reasonable.
I call being reasonable not missing the point. While Mr.Putin-style jesting is quite the opposite thing. And why talk of what SHOULD be, when the thing that matters is what WILL be?
: You're missing the point of the discussion :)
Of course he is. Most of the Boards' active community is like that. Few actually try to be reasonable, the rest just tread on people's fingers here, because they can't do enough of that in game.
: To those who are crying about smurfs, should actually learn from them to get better, or u can stay and cry for everything that game brings you.
Well, when your little kid gets beaten to blood by elder kids, tell him to better learn from them to get better instead of crying. Hope that helps.
: Just a tip on language use
Honestly speaking they should have said "November 19, 00:00:00". And that would be exact time where the season ends, unlike "midnight of a certain day". BTW in Russian they wrote that the season would end "On the **November 18-th** when the clock strike midnight" :D
: Senna = Pyke 2.0 ?
Senna is strong. But she's no assassin, come on! She needs her farm (her 50+ stacks) to actually become a killing machine. She can't snowball like Pyke, can she? And she's no full support,either. She's a mix of support and ADC. So that you build heals and shields and AP as a supp , and you build AD, mana, and IE if you play ADC.
: How many more 4v5's do I have to play?
5 games in 10 hours? Man, you were lucky! I played 4 matches today (even though normals, not rankeds) and 3 of them had AFKers. How would you like this kind of chance?
: Forget about it, you still didn't understand what i wrote, leave it i ain't got no time
Ah ye sure it's everyone around who don't understand and it's you who understand whether they understand or not. So typical )
: It's just a logic, 1 is equal to 1, do i need to prove it? If i say 1 + x >= 1 it's logical. ( | x belong to N) 1 is the current state, x is the time it may increase, if x is reasonable it's fine. I'm not arguing anymore with kids.
Well, hope those kids of yours are happy you do not, it must be pretty boring for them. Again. Matchmaking is not 1+1. Unless you try to model it as a system, at least mathematically, there's nothing to talk about seriously.
: Useless comment without a reason to exist, you could just not reply. (as this one) Btw in the worst case scenario you just have a little bit longer queue (little bit), if the idea of the autofill works, you'll have the exect queue time and noone will be autofilled with their excluded role, win-win.
> Btw in the worst case scenario you just have a little bit longer queue Babble without numbers is babble. Go on. Or maybe do the math to prove it?
: No problem more easier to solve. Put that feature as a preference ("I'm not confident play adc"), matchmaking will try to found a suitable team in a reasonable amount of time, if it wont find it then it'll ignore the preference. The "problem" is the tuning of time, you'll solve it with a test period over a region.
Test period over a region? AHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHA! Sorry. First, you've got no idea what you're talking about. Just do an experimental matchmaker rework like THAT and just send it live is a huge risk to break all the queues at once in case something happens that you did not account for. And that means server downtime and a hotfix to reverse all the latest changes. And that means people leaving because of tech problems, and money losses. And all that just to test some simple mechanics that you could test in a sim? You just do not do experiments like that on live production server. You do the modelling first. Second, I never suggested Riots to do it. I addressed this to you, guys, who fight autofill in the comments with all the fierceness and cunning of a kid who wants his mom buy him a candy. Have you ever TESTED what you demand, huh? Or is it maybe not so easy as downvoting?
: Just wondering, what about disabling the ‘Autofill protected’ option along with restricting the primary search time to 3-5 minutes? Wouldn’t that resolve the issues?
Try modeling it yourself. You will see that waiting time for a match depends on the waiting time for the role in the worst shortage. If everyone hates playing ADC, then you will not be matched until you find 2 players online and in the same queue who are willing to play ADC now. Now, guess, what will happen if you let people exclude a certain role?
: How to play Lissandra/Cassiopeia/Diana Top Lane Bronze1/Silver5 elo..
IDK for Diana, but Cassio is a pure damage dealer, ability-based glass cannon, and she's got more or less the same building path everywhere. Healing? Hardly so. But you can try defending yourself from dashes and blinks with Grounding, and you can hit with your Q to get that movement speed bonus. Basically, you just farm for free with E (mana refund on kill), and once you hit someone with your Q/W, you start melting him down with E, E, E, E. Of course, you should have enough mana for that... Also, the shield on Seraph may help you survive a bit, and Rylai scepter, too (and that little passive slow will let you keep your distance a bit easier). And Lissandra had been a nice toper for a long time. Until rework! You just build her defensively (something like RoA, Banshee and Zhonya, maybe Liandry), poke through minion wave with that Q shatter, and kite your enemy using W-root and E-blink. You're ranged, he's not. Passive won't help you much before teamfights, but it may work against a gank in case you manage to kill one of the two (which is hardly the case, since you build tanky and your burst is low).
: and it all depends on what ELO you are in and what you term as Trolling... I play new champ Senna adc and get called troll all the time, but I not lost a game yet playing her that position. Does that make me a troll or everyone else narrow minded?
But Senna IS ADC, lol! :D She's an ADC/Support mix, same as Kog was mage/ADC once, long ago.
Aethesth (EUW)
: But if someone says: hi guys my bro swain needs a win (swain is in opponent team) Then locks in Janna mid with ghost cleanse. Is that being narrow-minded or is that just straight-up trolling in queue. Edit: I got a print screen of this. But I don't think I am allowed to post it.
Saying things like that maybe trolling in its original meaning: i.e. being provocative to bait other people into doing something that would earn them banhammer strike. You never know unless you spend half of an hour for that match.
: Define a troll pick? You are allowed to play whatever champion or summoner spell you want in whatever role you choose. As long as you don't intentionally ruin the game for anyone else (e.g. your teammates) you haven't done anything that can be considered bannable.
And since no one can define what "ruining a game" is (except just dying again and again as soon as you get spawned), then you're entitled to do pretty much anything. Just turn off the chat.
: Nerf windwall duration. common 4 seconds...
Kog'Maw, Tristana, Vayne, Varus: build Attack Speed to kill whole team within 2 secs Yasuo: EAT MY WALL, IMMA BEST SUPPOR, Ctrl+7. No, seriously. Blocking skillshots is okay, but blocking whole ADC's kit is a bit too much. How about the wall just makes AA projectiles weaker but lets them pass?
Xplosion101 (EUNE)
: I remember them though... If you can't try to write 'em down somewhere, just in case.
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: yes and the moment i notice that my account has changed e-mail and i have the e-mail "if this wasn't you please contact the support team" what do you think would happen?
Ah, man, I am not going to fight you to the win! It's your account and your choice. Warn you is all I can do.
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: when i lost my username i gave them this info and no you won't be able to steal anything as i knew my password and my e-mail
> and no you won't be able to steal anything Of course having _only this_ is nothing bad. But in case one compromises your acess to teh acc, he can say that he also lost access to the email (yours email) and made a new one, and as a proof he can give this crucial piece of info. I ma not going to steal anything, this is just security basics: you don't publish info that's supposed to be known by you only. So you'd better remove these names, seriously, unless you're in a risky mood
Clαps (EUW)
: is yasuo top weak right now ? build advice ?
Go ADC. I heard it works this season.
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: i started season 2 the champions i played almost exclusively until lvl 30 were: mord, brand, riven it's not bullshit but it's expected that you remember your first few months of the game
well... now I know how to steal you account! :D And everyone else, who is reading this. Maybe I should start the topic about card numbers and CVV? ) I could name couple of champions that I purchased at the very beginning. But no more than a couple, and I am not sure, whether they really were exactlly the first ones purchased.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Rainfollower,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=x1No7P4h,comment-id=0000000200000000,timestamp=2019-11-12T15:14:38.171+0000) > > I've got no idea how your personal experience of having certain players in your games should influence the whole balance system. While the fact that some players come here to whine that tanks are dead should compel RioT to do EVERYTHING she can about it because, hey, must be true. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
Well, you tried to say something non sequitur, but accidentally hit the point: actually, yes. Maybe not at once, but eventually so. The reason being: if Riots know their business, then they are already full aware of the current state of tanks, but people complaining at the boards en masse, consistently and truthfully, only designate that well-known state as _problematic_ one. In the end, this is the only thing that is meaningful about balance: whether people want to play the game or not.
: > [{quoted}](name=Rainfollower,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=x1No7P4h,comment-id=00000002,timestamp=2019-11-12T14:41:30.468+0000) > > Saying it shortly, the decrease of complexity is the problem. We're moving from point A to point B, where point A was the place where most roles could be useful in carrying a game, if utilized properly, and point B is where there're only the Snowballs rolling downhill and the snow in their path. I would agree with that if i could see less players feeding horribly in the first 10 minutes and then DEMANDING that somehow they should still not lose lane (which in itself, has nothing to do with the duration of the game). When you can't play, you deserve to lose. It's simply pointless to make games last 10-20 more minutes and hope that feeders would somehow salvage it. When they are REALLY able to (rather than give up, trolling or going AFK), it can happen now already.
I've got no idea how your personal experience of having certain players in your games should influence the whole balance system.
: As a matter of fact "meta" always used to mean "most effective tactic available" (or something like that). So, if the new "meta" now involves playing something different form the last, what's the problem? I mean, at the end of the day, any player plays what he is convinced to be the best, either by his choice, or because he was told. What's the point of arbitrarily decide that something is wrong and something else is right? Who exactly told you which is which after all? {{sticker:sg-lux-2}}
> As a matter of fact "meta" always used to mean "most effective tactic available" (or something like that). So, if the new "meta" now involves playing something different form the last, what's the problem? Saying it shortly, the decrease of complexity is the problem. We're moving from point A to point B, where point A was the place where most roles could be useful in carrying a game, if utilized properly, and point B is where there're only the Snowballs rolling downhill and the snow in their path.
: > [{quoted}](name=Rainfollower,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=bYUK3mNZ,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2019-11-11T07:07:33.087+0000) > > One Fizz also found her annoying when facing me, or rather, turning his back to me =) > > He was retreating to base on foot. And somehow he showed up near his T3 turret, ultra-low on HP. > POOF. Instakill from T1 botlane! Yeah I think her ult needs changing, as right now it happens so fast that there is no counter-play available.
> as right now it happens so fast Hm... isn't Luxanna's laser the same story? Also there's Ezreal's Ulti that 'happens' to you very fast, unless you know he's casting.
: Can't say mutch first pickers insta lock in and on other games they ban her so not really available atm lol
Want an advice? Go draft, pick Supp. I had whole serie of lobbies where support was high in pick order and could pick Senna.
: I've only faced her once so I haven't formed much of an opinion of her. In lane I found her annoying to face but not super strong.
One Fizz also found her annoying when facing me, or rather, turning his back to me =) He was retreating to base on foot. And somehow he showed up near his T3 turret, ultra-low on HP. POOF. Instakill from T1 botlane!
VIT Laati (EUNE)
: Global Luxanna ult. Stealth for the whole team. What else do I need to say?
> Stealth for the whole team. If the team is clever enough! Maybe in high Plat that is the case, but in common Silver even a ganking jungler will ignore your 'stealth field' being right next to it. Her E is quite... controversial, in my opinion. I know, it looks a terrible menace in theory. But in practice it is quite hard to use properly. Much like the Ulti of old Yorick (if you're old enough to remember that).
: > [{quoted}](name=Vayne In The Cut,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=bYUK3mNZ,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-11-10T22:39:47.869+0000) > > Range of her snare which can snare more than 1 person. Q that heals has houmungus range can be cast of wards and damages turrets for no reason.
Q damages turrets? LOL!
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Rainfollower,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Ju4R34Nq,comment-id=00050001,timestamp=2019-11-09T19:02:37.415+0000) > > I would not not be too sure where Riot earns more. Only an account who bought EVERYTHING can't spend more money (try calculating how much is 'everything" in LoL). And a player who already was permabanned once, would be much more cautious with spending money in League. Oh, he can buy a boosted acc, sure! But how much would you really invest when you boost? Are you real or you are just a figment of my imagination? I was beginning to feel like no thinking beings would ever happen to wander through here....! {{sticker:sg-zephyr}}
Wanna hear a joke? ) A man is going to bed, but he can't sleep, because he is in doubt. He can't decide if God exists or not. He spends a lot of time pondering on the question. He's restless! Is there a God? Or isn't? And suddenly there's a voice from above: "No! There's no Me. Go sleep already". {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
: Buying the same stuff again isn't limited to banned accounts who already had everything, I am curious how you reached that conclusion? Lets consider the factors involved when closing an account for whatever reason. The player loses everything he or she invested, and is now presented with 3 options: 1. Leave the game for good. 2. Start a new account with the saltyness / aggrevated attitude / toxic behavior that no doubt follows from losing your investment. 3. Buy a boosted account. In the above it's only number 1 that benefits the overall health of the game, the reason I didn't list the player starting over with a more calm attitude, is because that would mean the overall health of the game does improve, when in fact it just gets worse and worse as time goes on. So if a player does indeed start over with a more calm attitude, that type of person is a true minority in this game, as evidenced every single day! Now it may just be that the people in charge at Riot HQ are all people with bags full of rocks, but if you are working on improving the state of the game it's also evidenced by each passing season, that their approach is not working on any level.., but Riot being Riot, they will just claim it's 0.0006% who display behavior toxic enough to warrent account closure, when everyone who playes more than 3 games per day, knows that number is smoke. Since it's clear Riot is not in the business of improving the state of the game, what other possible motive could there be to let things escalate beyond all reason as is currently the case? You can extend this whole topic into why **_some_** players eventually just snap, and that also lands at the feet of Riot, because it's their design making **_some_** people go crazy over time.., and of course they also get penalised, so you have built in systems to ensure that shit hits the fan, and when it does Riot is there to offer them a new account.
> Buying the same stuff again isn't limited to banned accounts who already had everything, I am curious how you reached that conclusion? I did not reach that conclusion at all. You did, just now. What I am saying is that very few accounts actually reached that limit where they can buy nothing else (because all the purchasable stuff together is a HUGE sum). All others can spend more money. Then, I am trying to compare two groups: those banned and returning, and those who stay in the game. Who's more prone to make one more purchase? I think, there're some factors that will make a salty, hurt, humiliated banned-and-returning player a worse customer than the one who still keeps his account with everything that he already 'owns'.
: Gonna go out on a limb here and say it won't happen for 2 reasons, primarily because Riot earns more by closing accounts and letting people start from scratch, and because Riot does not have the capabilities to even remotely pull of a system intelligent enough to recognise the patterns. Still upvoting the post though, since maybe.., just maybe this dimwitted company pulls their head from their ass long enough to see the light.
I would not not be too sure where Riot earns more. Only an account who bought EVERYTHING can't spend more money (try calculating how much is 'everything" in LoL). And a player who already was permabanned once, would be much more cautious with spending money in League. Oh, he can buy a boosted acc, sure! But how much would you really invest when you boost?
JustClone (EUNE)
: It is extremely unlikely that you will achieve this. Even as team of 5. I will give you some basic logic and numbers, that you can use in your next posts: The walk to side lanes is 40-42 sec. The death timer pre 6 is 6-16 seconds. This means you will have less that 10-15 seconds left to kill a person. And you need to start killing him even before minions spawn. In other words, he has to be willing to die 8 times. Use of teleport and ghost, champion with free mobility skill, etc... If you had the similar skills to skirmish, you would be facing faker in your games to begin with...
So you can't achieve this without running it down the lane?..
: That MF made a mistake to stay with such low hp, if she makes that mistake more than 8 times in 10 fkin minutes I think it's deserving of a ban
She was not staying, she was actually running away after a bad encounter. I only caught up with her, killed her and retreated into the bush near Krugs. All in all, this was a story about how easy diving is when you have the right champion. Sure, dying again and again in the same place is stupid and probably intentional. But almost _any kind_ of automated banning rule is going to fail and to be abused in such a complex environment as League of Legends.
: It says a lot about the state of the community that this has gotten so many upvotes. Anyway, you are forgetting one key element here: Smurfs. Put a Diamond smurf against your average Gold/Silver player and the Gold/Silver player is going to die a lot in lane. And of course it will get even worse for them if the Diamond player is duo with a jungler and they effectively 2v1 the lane. "sit under turret and farm safely" ????? They will get tower dived 24/7 and then ganked on their way back to the lane. Yes it sucks having a teammate going 0/8 in 10 minutes but if they are against a smurf there is literally nothing they can do.
> "sit under turret and farm safely" Ah right, dived a retreating low HP MF just recently with Hecarim — right through the tower that's been attacking me. E, Predator, couple of hits, Q, free kill! Mind you, no ulti. And I even haven't been specially fed or way below my level.
: It's extremely %%%%ing difficult to win a game when all 5 team members are trying to kill a single person, you know staying under tower and farming minions under the tower and manipulating the wave isn't too difficult, if it is then just get deranked because this basic shit is so easy to do, and if you can't do it then you don't deserve your rank.
Win the game? Who said anything about winning the game? You just chase and steal every kill in vicinity, farm 24/3 and since you're That Good, it's everyone else who is guilty of losing such a good match, obviously. /all report my team /all cant carry this solo /all gg Haven't you ever seen this kind of behaviour? I've seen it more than enough. Both in game an here, on boards, where people protest against nerfing overly strong champions and demand to nerf the weak even more by tuning their items down. This "Abuse OP" philosophy is quite common now. Even I tried playing this way (but found out that being helpful for the team is too much important for me). PS: if you want to know what I have to say on the smurf and inting problem, I will tell you that the first thing Rito should do is turn off their goddamaned blind bots-overseers (AFK-prevention and such) and chat filters and give the decision to people somehow. I do not know, how exactly, but I think that procedure can be established, either via hiring special people or via giving the power to players. And then it can be fixed and polished to perfection over time. Ah! And fix their punishments so that they could actually punish people early (which is now almost impossible).
: If someone goes 0/8 in 10 minutes they deserve ban
Well... Once you declare such a rule, it will turn into a sport: find a bad player and kill him 8 times before 10:00 to prove your skill.
Rioter Comments
: Well atleast asking to report people like this is punishable lol "Pls report player XXX for trolling" bang and you got a ban lul
Ah, automated system just doesn't care. You know before report calling on such people, it was customary to demand "x9 report" on every noob who really had a bad game vs a years-old veteran. It was no fun.
: Replies to Posts
Well, that's typical. Most of the the usual boards' patrons are like clockwork music boxes: they repeat the same tune in every topic that's got even the slightest relation to their idee fixe, be that Elo superiority, Rito conspiracy theory, or maybe Shaco removal.
: Ignore him, he won't see the sun until doctors learn to dislocate a head from an ass, which explains why he's talking out of his behind.
Desimp (EUNE)
: ***
Oh wow look this one is tryiong top make some moar meaningless sounds. What a pity no one cares.
Desimp (EUNE)
: You dont?? Or you probably believe "diamond players are same skilled as bronze" Or maybe bronze arent so lucky to get diamond...You dont even make sense dude.Elo says evrything. Action speak louder then words.
You don't read. So therefore please don't talk. You've made enough fun of yourself already.
Show more

Rainfollower

Level 205 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion