Dosaho (EUW)
: forum
The account issue is easily fixed by posting here, so it should be fine by now! Unfortunately, the Hextech chest issue requires you to contact support, and seeing that you say you have issues with it, could you please provide screenshots of it? Might be something as plain as forgetting to "check a box", but better to be sure of it!
: Reform after 14-day ban?
Dropping punishment tier and getting Hextech rewards back are separate concepts. You also don't get your previous honour points back.
killdie2 (EUNE)
: i go to new server i was euna now im in turkey server
So? You can only get a name change by buying it.
killdie2 (EUNE)
: this message for riot games
You will be prompted to change your name only if it's already taken on the new server. You can change name by buying the name change service.
: So how will challenger series work without ranked team ?
It's been two seasons in a row that ranked team was retired. I had to ask around because it's not a topic I'm knowledgeable about, and I got told that, currently, ranked team qualifiers are registered and held through Battlegrounds.
: soo wards placing and killing enemies while staying alive anything else?
Well, those are stats that count a lot for getting S. Ah, yes, and objectives taken.
tHooky (EUNE)
: Key fragmets!
Since the Honour update will be hitting the servers very soon, I reckon that suggestions on how to change the drop rates should wait until the system has been established, because honours will directly influence the rate of dropping key fragments.
: On team speak :D
That's not exactly a trustable source... Unless announced by Riot, nothing will change next season.
: Very Important Question
Where did you get the info that ranked teams will be back?
Vonyalo (EUW)
: ***
Tencent owns Riot Games, not the other way around. It's Tencent that siphons money out of Riot, not the other way around. Riot doesn't get the money from other games _hosted_ by Tencent -- Tencent is not a producer, it's mostly a publisher, if we exclude some mobile games developed in-house. And if Riot doesn't produce money, it will be shut down, and the game with it.
: s or s-
Uuuh...plant wards and destroy enemies'?
Vonyalo (EUW)
: "The problem, in Weidemann's eyes, is that Riot Games is just too darn generous with its players" didn't read past that http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/016/729/large.jpg I wonder if he even played LoL. What is generous? Is giving nothing "darn generous"? Look at hearthstone, you can do daily and buy packs on gold you receive, you can disenchant duplicates into dust and craft the card you want with it. And if you're good you can play arena to get even more packs, gold and stuff. And guess what, even that considered greedy in comparison with other games like shadowverse where they giving free packs like crazy. Look at dota where you just play and randomly get stuff, you can trade it, you can buy it cheap in market. Not to say for money they give much more stuff than icons and borders that you see only while loading. And what do we have in LoL? Well, let's start with the fact if you play not good enough (lower than s-), all you get is IP.... wow... what a generous model indeed. Even if you managed to get S, you still need randomly dropping keys, you have to play different champs cause you cant get chest more than once, you only have 4 chests per month, even if you get chest you might get a champ shard from it (even one you already have), and even if you're very very lucky, even if you've got skin you want from a chest - you still need orange essence to unlock it. WOW. Fking generous indeed.
Why are you still comparing Valve and Blizzard, that each own multiple games/brands and a very big online store, with Riot Games, whose main source of income is RP sales for a single game?
: Why did you cycle the BUY button? I think this skin is Legacy and you can't buy it. I am not sure though. Make sure to contact Riot Support
OP says that he unlocked the skin via Hextech crafting, and it's showed as locked. Slayer Pantheon is indeed legacy (tied to Harrowing), but it should have no ties with Hextech crafting. Contacting support is the best bet.
Khã Zîx (EUW)
: never typed n words or homophobic stuff, just typed to renekton "100% french to being such an idiot" should i send a ticket? i mean what the hell that guy keeps play and flamed the aadc whole game lmao nice tribunal
> [{quoted}](name=Khã Zîx,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=thhJ2iV8,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2017-06-26T08:13:01.025+0000) > > just typed to renekton "100% french to being such an idiot" Well...you just showed a bigoted attitude against France (by equating French people to idiots). That is something that is frowned upon. However, I'm interested in your chat logs. Those could reveal the reason you skipped the 25 CR stage.
: Is there any way to play against only equal or worse players, not better?
So, you want to play against worse opponents. How is that fair? And wouldn't your own idea prevent you from achieving that, since you would be "better" than them?
Zaichis (EUW)
: Well, considering that you never seen the guy, you can't say that he's ugly
Semantics. After all, you _are_ playing with semantics in order to detach the rudeness from your "facts". "It's a fact, therefore it ain't flame" is an argument that I've seen countless times, and that willingly forgets about the concepts of "politeness" and "consideration".
Zaichis (EUW)
: Is this flaming
If you call a fat person "ugly fatso", is it facts or a very rude thing to say? Hint: one doesn't exclude the other.
Vonyalo (EUW)
: don't listen to him, google a little bit and you'll know they already have much more than enough. I don't understand what is he talking about, probably just another riot defender. Considering trading - knowing riot they will never ever do this. Greed is their middle name
> [{quoted}](name=Vonyalo,realm=EUW,application-id=VnI9tlaf,discussion-id=ZwHBUZqy,comment-id=00010000000000010000,timestamp=2017-06-25T20:31:06.797+0000) > > don't listen to him, google a little bit and you'll know they already have much more than enough. For what, exactly? There are electricity bills and Internet bills to pay, workers to pay, orchestras to pay, spare parts to buy, Amsterdam data center loans to pay. Stadium loans for LCS and Worlds to pay. New projects to develop. Riot Direct requires money. Keeping the company from going red requires profits to be made. So tell me, what exactly is 'enough', and for what? http://www.pcgamer.com/ubisoft-analyst-criticizes-league-of-legends-monetization-warns-other-studios-not-to-try-it/
NiuLogic (EUW)
: Would there be a possibilty that leauge would be not the only source from income riot can relay on in the future next 7 years ?
I'm not a Rioter, so I don't know. I believe, however, that the founders at some point said that they had plans to live up to the name of Riot Game**s** -- aka developing other games.
Vonyalo (EUW)
: I wonder why dota is fine with trading and lol for some reason wouldn't be able to keep servers :D just curious
Because RP sales are literally Riot's only revenue, for Riot's only game. Valve doesn't depend on Dota for its continued existence.
LeBrön (EUW)
: [TRADING SYSTEM] Riot?
Riot depends on skin sales to keep running the game. If you were allowed to trade skin shards, you would never buy RP anymore, and with you, countless other users. Riot wouldn't be able to keep running the servers and pay workers. There's people who have to put food on their table, after all.
: If you are getting hextech chests and key fragments you got nothing to worry about. Getting keys and chests means your behavior is fine and you will get your rewards.
No, it isn't tied to ranked rewards. You could get Hextech back, but if you were banned within 3 months before the end of the season you would still _not_ get the rewards.
MrQQmur (EUW)
: You equal toxic chat behavior to trolling, that is a mistake to say the least. It is intentional feeding which I do agree is worth a ban if done often. That doesn't make my point any less valid. You didn't provide proof to build on your arguments, you provided proof that strengthened mine. There have been LONGER chat restrictions, but never before has chat been completely been removed from accounts that showed toxic chat use. Saying you're one of the editors is one of the worst things to do when you want to state it is an independent website. I agree that bans for griefing/giving up/leaving/afking are here to stay, I disagree with the way RIOT deals with chat behavior bans. It is an ineffective way in the current system since creating new accounts is a joke. It creates a HUGE opportunity for people to make sure new players have a terrible time by being placed either in a full bot team or a full toxic team that doesn't have any chat restrictions. It encourages people to spend money on the game, that is for sure. It doesn't encourage new people to play this game, which in the end is the best way to make sure your game will slowly die. I care about league and I do not think that being offensive towards your team is a good thing. I do think that an account ban isn't a solution for said problems. Mainly because creating new accounts is such a joke and therefore creates a lower elo and lower lvl (below 30) experience that is far worse then it was back in the days league just started. A mere chat removal would do more to prevent offensive chatting then the current restrictions/bans.
> [{quoted}](name=MrQQmur,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=00040000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-25T12:06:43.102+0000) > > You equal toxic chat behavior to trolling, that is a mistake to say the least. It is intentional feeding which I do agree is worth a ban if done often. That doesn't make my point any less valid. Are you saying that _intentionally sabotaging your team_ isn't toxic? Because there is a reason why it's bannable, and not because Riot decided that. But because _the community_ decided that. > There have been LONGER chat restrictions, but never before has chat been completely been removed from accounts that showed toxic chat use. Can you say that removing chat completely wouldn't have the same effect as the chat restriction experiment? Can you assure people wouldn't run down mid if displeased enough and unable to express it through chat? This is a point you're consistently dodging. > Saying you're one of the editors is one of the worst things to do when you want to state it is an independent website. I'm not on Riot's paycheck list, last time I checked. And being a boards frequenter should not influence the fact that it's an independently built, and maintained, website. After all, I have no interest in defending Riot if I believed that what they're doing is harmful. > It is an ineffective way in the current system Show data. I showed you my sources. You should start backing up your claims, instead of trying to argue hard data by generalizing your singular experiences and viewpoint. Remember, your opinions aren't facts, unless corroborated by data.
: Will i be able to get my Victorious Skin if i've been chat restricted?
If we go by previous years' trends, yes, you should be able to get your end of season ranked rewards.
: hello sir. i have 2 requests. 1. we need balkan server cos countries like greece have shitty ms both in eune and euw. 2. (easier) english language available on the turkish server plz! since there is no middle east server nor balkan , countries like cyprus have it much easier playing on the turkish server but cannot speak english. at least make the client have english tags. actually, english language should be an option on every single server.
Eambo doesn't work on client development, and neither in server placements. Regional servers only happen if the local population and infrastructure fit Riot's standards for healthy matchmaking and service. It's the very reason a South Africa server hasn't happened, despite countless requests.
: Aftergame client load
It's intended. The client has to boot back up -- of course it needs time.
: Sure if he calls me a bad player right after having 2 bot games in a row I will react to him. So keep banning random accounts, who cares? And prick is such a terrible insult. But I guess him baiting me when it was obviously mad is perfectly fine with you. Every post he made was just aiming at getting a reaction that he can report. Yeah I was mad and he got what he wanted. Happy now?
> [{quoted}](name=Dividedby0error,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=K4MmuteV,comment-id=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-24T16:23:11.450+0000) > > Sure if he calls me a bad player right after having 2 bot games in a row I will react to him. So keep banning random accounts, who cares? You seem to imply that you should be forgiven on the basis that someone else started it. I hope I'm wrong, because children usually learn in kindergarten that witnessing/experiencing rulebreaking isn't a free leave to do the same. ^ It's the same logic used for the game's punishment system, when it comes to verbal misbehaviour, btw.
: got some questions regarding geting ddosed in ranked
If you were DDOSed, you wouldn't have been able to surf the net at all. Also, DDOS requires to use a giant botnet, and knowing your IP. Since you connect to Riot's servers, and not someone else's pc, your IP is hidden.
MrQQmur (EUW)
: You were eager to provide a link stating that it would prove you were right even though it does quite the opposite. Not to mention that you couldn't even give these so called independent researchers reports on paper, which essentially makes your statements just as pointless as an opinion. I understand that you do not agree with me, however that doesn't that you can just come at me saying everything I say is false. Especially since you haven't provided any good evidence yet. You provide a link to a site that doesn't state anything about chat removal. They had longer chat restrictions, but they didn't REMOVE chat. I would also like to make note of the fact that RIOT has increased the ban rates since 2015 and I highly suspect it has benefited both RIOT and account sellers. Not because there was less toxicity, but because there were more new accounts being made/bought.
> [{quoted}](name=MrQQmur,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=000400000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-24T15:12:05.451+0000) > > You were eager to provide a link stating that it would prove you were right even though it does quite the opposite. Not to mention that you couldn't even give these so called independent researchers reports on paper, which essentially makes your statements just as pointless as an opinion. The sources are listed under each article. Unfortunately, some of those sources were taken off in the time it took us to compile them and write the articles. Yes, I'm one of the editors. You made your claims, I countered them and provided sources. The burden of proof is on you. I'd like to mention that having the chat removed completely doesn't mean in the slightest that the affected player won't troll. Can you provide a 100% certainty that it won't happen?
: Trading System
Riot would go bankrupt if they allowed that. Skin sales is what keeps the game alive and paid for.
: Well yeah. I didn't think about that. They would get probably banned if they started trolling though
...Much later, though. And they would ruin many more matches.
Dreadara (EUW)
: Well i treat it like normals, cuz the only rank showing your skill is soloq.. Cuz in 5man u can get carried so hard by premade better players.
Teamwork, and getting carried, are also skills.
: If Riot removed chat, toxicity would dissapear from league. Just think about it. But you say: yes then how will the players communicate? Well, Riot can add some pings like "warded" or "push this lane" or I don't know
> [{quoted}](name=Kaloutsidis69,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2017-06-17T13:11:49.829+0000) > > If Riot removed chat, toxicity would dissapear from league. Are you sure? Because they kinda tried that, and people started trolling instead. Can you say for sure that someone who's angry enough, and unable to broadcast their anger, won't start trolling their teammates?
MrQQmur (EUW)
: Honestly, I bet they make more money from RP bought to boost smurfs and give smurfs a decent champion/rune kit. You just wrote that people have been banned while spending hunderds of bucks, these people clearly had a negative experience of some sort. Why else would they start raging (the most common form of toxicity). However a player that doesn't do anything toxic will NOT spend any bucks after a negative experience. I'll have to quit replying to you mr. white knight. If all you can do is deny they fact that the current system is not meant for the players... it is meant for RIOT to fill their pockets with money spent on smurf accounts from (permanently/temporary) suspended players. My player experience hasn't improved. I've tried making a smurf for fun... I can assure you that none of my games were much fun to speak of since rank 1-29 is filled with smurfs,toxic smurfs or bots. This will in the end result in less new players and that might in the end kill this game. > You're kinda projecting your own experience. There are people who complain about being permabanned after spending entire bucks in the game. This means that they actually spent money, before or after the first tiers of punishments is not of consequence. You're the ONLY white knight even replying to this, talking about projecting your own experience. Yet you still refuse to accept that the current new player experience is one of the worst new player experiences I've ever seen in both LoL and other games. Playing games with a load of scripts or raging teammates that have been banned for doing as such, isn't really what I would enjoy putting effort in to reach lvl 30. However, these bots and smurfs could spend some bucks on boosters so they can play rankeds again quickly or sell their account.
> [{quoted}](name=MrQQmur,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=0004000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-24T08:54:02.060+0000) > > However a player that doesn't do anything toxic will NOT spend any bucks after a negative experience. If you want to make use of anecdotal evidence as your proof... then: I got cancer flamed, harassed and trolled and I still spend money in this game. Why shouldn't I do it? > Yet you still refuse to accept that the current new player experience is one of the worst new player experiences I've ever seen in both LoL and other games. Where did I say that? I'm saying that I prefer seeing the half full glass, instead of looking at the half empty one and talk about it like it's fully empty. White knightism...or simple optimism? I have the feeling that people who scream "white knight" actually don't even know what it means.
MrQQmur (EUW)
: >You're kinda projecting your own experience. There are people who complain about being permabanned after spending entire bucks in the game. This means that they actually spent money, before or after the first tiers of punishments is not of consequence. That happens when RIOT hides these numbers from us, they only post numbers they like. That doesn't mean those numbers give an accurate presentation of what it is like. > They tried it. It didn't work as well as you think it would. Did they really? Where is your evidence of that, because as far as I can tell they've never done such a thing because communicating is so important to them(but they don't add voice chat). Let me be clear, you don't HAVE to defend RIOT, their current banning system for toxic players is fishy to say the least.
> [{quoted}](name=MrQQmur,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=0004000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-24T09:18:32.808+0000) > > That happens when RIOT hides these numbers from us, they only post numbers they like. That doesn't mean those numbers give an accurate presentation of what it is like. Fascinatingly enough, no independent researcher has found any contradiction in Riot-provided data. And they all use the same data. > Did they really? Where is your evidence of that, because as far as I can tell they've never done such a thing because communicating is so important to them(but they don't add voice chat). In 2015. I'm assuming you weren't playing at that time. Feel free to check the articles here: http://en.volu-eu.org/library.php
: No one is really getting what i am trying to say. What i am trying to say is that riot should give a free skin 1 per account to players whichever they want this wont include any skins higher than 1350 rp. Atleast they should give 1 free skin so a player can start with a skin he wants. Ok so i want cosmic blade yi and look at this luck skins which i want goes to my friend and which he wants goes to me i dont need them. And let me tell u giving 1 skin for upto 1350 rp per player wont lower their market so think before u comment
> [{quoted}](name=Fatherisback2k2,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=4p2pMl6V,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-06-24T05:25:05.764+0000) > > No one is really getting what i am trying to say. What i am trying to say is that riot should give a free skin 1 per account to players whichever they want this wont include any skins higher than 1350 rp. Oh, but they did it already, at least twice if I remember correctly. Except it was a mystery skin, and for good behaviour. Why should they give out free skins for the kicks?
: Dunno man, my last game only had 9 lines of chat on it. And the only thing that could be considered an insult in that game was literally 'are you dumb' in response to a triple kill the enemy got in minute 1. Also, where does it say they are two different concepts, what does a 'reform period' even mean at this point? If a reform period doesn't mean a punishment drop when it's over, what does it mean?
Because it would be too easy and predictable if punished people who got Hextech ban lifted also had their punishment tier dropped. Riot keeps the concepts separate, so that people can't try and game the system to avoid the next level punishment.
: You have a good point but what if someone like me mains jinx and want star guardian jinx or want cosmic blade yi but cant buy it because every one cant afford it. Atleast riot should allow people to trade 1 skin once in their lifetime this wont hurt their business will it? lets say a person mains trynda and he got like 5 skins which he does not want. There should be someway he would be able to trade tht skin if he cant buy it just once every one account not bad at all
> [{quoted}](name=Fatherisback2k2,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=4p2pMl6V,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-06-24T02:48:41.463+0000) > > You have a good point but what if someone like me mains jinx and want star guardian jinx or want cosmic blade yi but cant buy it because every one cant afford it. Hextech crafting and skin sales exist for that reason.
: Hmm, when I got a 14 day ban 2 months ago, I didn't use chat for 2 months. When I got the hexteches back and I asked riot if my accounts has gotten better, they answered it has gotten better. So, I started using chat again, I had a really bad game about a week ago and I did flame that game but I didn't get banned. However, I said a lot of things that could be considered flaming by the system but isn't. I said in a game that ''ezreal is a trash adc'', but that ezreal was in the enemy team. Same with another thing I said, ''we would have no chance of winning if zed wasn't trash'' but that zed was on the enemy team and I was trying to motivate our adc to get back to playing. The thing is, the game I got banned was a game where I only wrote 9 times in the chat in 26 minutes. If it's intended to keep me on my toes, why does both the crafting page and the rioter on the Turkish server say that it means you're reformed if you start getting hextech loot?
You keep mixing up the two concepts. They're entirely separate. Also, there's a simple explanation as to why you weren't banned: you probably weren't reported.
MrQQmur (EUW)
: Isn't toxic people what this discussion is about, banned or not, the discussion if you should ban people for writing some letters to someone else. > Is it a fact, or an opinion? Because you haven't provided sources for the supposed ineffectiveness of account bans. Quite likely a fact since people can make/buy new accounts as often as they would like. Any of these actions would immediately have a negative impact on any unlucky players that are matched with said player. Given that you seem to think only a true devil can get banned. > It...never happened to me? I've seen the lone flamer, but I also remember that there are 8 more people who aren't flaming. Well it seems you must be living in white knight heaven, because on these forums I come across quite a lot of people who complain about the number of flamers/ragers. This isn't just because people that don't have anything to complain about do not come to the forums. It is most likely that they simply managed to do something which a lot of players can't: not caring about it at all. I find it a better solution if RIOT were to permanently remove chat from raging people then banning their entire account and serving the newbies another smurf with bad manners on a platter.
> [{quoted}](name=MrQQmur,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=00040000000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-23T22:30:16.010+0000) > > Isn't toxic people what this discussion is about, banned or not, the discussion if you should ban people for writing some letters to someone else. Why not? You accept a set of rules whenever there's a new patch for the game. If you don't agree with them, you should consider not playing the game at all. Besides, if you try shouting "some letters" at someone else on the road, you should be prepared for the consequences of doing so. > Given that you seem to think only a true devil can get banned. That's pretty much the gist of it. I mean, the numbers speak clearly. The same numbers you seem unable to provide a counter-source for. > Well it seems you must be living in white knight heaven, because on these forums I come across quite a lot of people who complain about the number of flamers/ragers. This isn't just because people that don't have anything to complain about do not come to the forums. It is most likely that they simply managed to do something which a lot of players can't: not caring about it at all. White knight heaven? No, I keep numbers in mind and remember that 8 > 1. Also, people who are satisfied about their experience don't feel like sharing it, because they have nothing to say. Surprising, isn't it? > I find it a better solution if RIOT were to permanently remove chat from raging people then banning their entire account and serving the newbies another smurf with bad manners on a platter. They tried it. It didn't work as well as you think it would.
MrQQmur (EUW)
: Why would you buy RP if you have been warned that you might get suspended(banned) even though said player will most likely at first feel like he/she is being treated unjustly? I remember my first chat restriction and I can assure you that I haven't bought any RP since because I refuse to actively fund this facade. I haven't had any further trouble either, but I do not intend to buy any in-game currency in a game that makes money out of banning players. In my opinion the current system inflicts more harm to the game then it does well. Or as some would say: The cure is worse than the ailment.
> [{quoted}](name=MrQQmur,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=Bf4fc3BM,comment-id=00040001000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-23T22:23:24.505+0000) > > Why would you buy RP if you have been warned that you might get suspended(banned) even though said player will most likely at first feel like he/she is being treated unjustly? I remember my first chat restriction and I can assure you that I haven't bought any RP since because I refuse to actively fund this facade. You're kinda projecting your own experience. There are people who complain about being permabanned after spending entire bucks in the game. This means that they actually spent money, before or after the first tiers of punishments is not of consequence. > I haven't had any further trouble either, but I do not intend to buy any in-game currency in a game that makes money out of banning players. Surprisingly, banning players gives more revenue to Riot, because if they didn't ban consistently toxic players, the others would leave the game, and the toxic ones wouldn't be enough to fund it with their purchases.
: Hmm, I searched the web quite a bit but I did not see any distinguishing between them, I only see in the hextech crafting restrictions page that it says you'll enter a reform period when the punishment ends. It also says that you'll be unable to get any hextech loot during the reform period. If you don't get a punishment level drop when the reform period ends, then when do you get it? Editing, also riot support didnt say that my punishment level didnt drop, they said my reform period hasn't ended.
> [{quoted}](name=Teressasildo,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MxXal0Vg,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2017-06-23T21:51:43.627+0000) > > If you don't get a punishment level drop when the reform period ends, then when do you get it? No one knows. It's because you have to keep a decent behaviour at all times. > Editing, also riot support didnt say that my punishment level didnt drop, they said my reform period hasn't ended. Well, it's intended to keep you on your toes. Also, I think it means exactly what you're wondering about: you haven't entered punishment reset territory yet.
: Question about the reform period to rioters.
You are mixing up the concepts of "reform" and "punishment level drop". They're **not**, in fact, one and the same. Reform for the purpose of Hextech loot is not tied to punishment drops. Those take in average much, much longer than simply being able to drop Hextech materials. If you notice, the Hextech support page never talks about punishment tier drop.
: What is the best way to gain a Specific Skin? (Help needed)
You can wait for the sale on SG Lux, but as I recall it was on sale pretty recently, so you would need to wait long for the next. Alternatively, you can wait to get the money for the skin at full price, or get lucky with Hextech crafting.
Sidias (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=archerno1,realm=EUNE,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=OwK6W29u,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-06-23T16:00:28.560+0000) > > Servers are fine... I see alot of ppl complaining about the servers, and more exactly as Moniseur Kast said, with connection. I just got salty, because I was playing ranked and It showed that I have 30 ping, but it was like 500
It's more likely connection issues between Bulgaria and Riot Games, not a widespread server problem.
Zednar (EUW)
: Yes, except it never is. If I knew rito punished people for calling report on me I would behave much differently, but they dont.
: CHANGING REGION
The ban applies to the account, not the region.
: Why
Because the game was in progress at the time of Loss Prevention activation, I reckon.
mushoaibali (EUNE)
: Bro they are busy banning innocent people. No time to fix servers man. Also OMG lower levels still have SO MANY BOTS playing...It is HORRIBLE. I did not know it was that bad down here.
Except that those busy investigating the problems surrounding Bulgaria _aren't_ the ones who issue account bans.
: i forgo my email :/ and need help
Part of the email address is hidden for security purposes, because it's one of the elements needed to breach and take hold of an account. If you forgot your email and wish to change it, you should contact support.
Show more

Shiwah

Level 30 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion