: NEW PLAYERS GETTING FORCED TO GO AGAINST A SMURF
Prime accounts could be a short term fix since we already have a way to link our phones but that won't work eventually. The best option would be connecting your ID like in Korea or China idk what specific region does that but I know a lot of people are against that.
: #LOLisOverParty2019
> [{quoted}](name=Extreme Occident,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=64FXd0ol,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-06-27T16:27:34.312+0000) > At least make Ascension mode perma available before you close it and let us enjoy the only left enjoyable mode that not trolls or afks can ruin. yikes
: Why wouldn't he? It's up to him what he wants as his username.
Because he's giving away his full name on the internet. In a game with a lot of toxicity. How does no one see what's wrong with that. I mean, in America he could literally get shot by a SWAT team just because someone knew his last name and put in the effort.
: WHY IS MY LASTNAME OFFENSIVE!?????????????????
Lol it's not discrimination. Why would you even want your full name as your user.
: > [{quoted}](name=Silent Note,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=aKi5oel9,comment-id=00090000,timestamp=2019-06-17T15:32:24.485+0000) > > I'm talking about normal games though, not ranked, so it won't cost me any LP. Normals are supposed to be less tryhard, so you could focus more on trying out things you're unfamiliar with, without the pressure of losing something if you don't win the game. > (The downvote wasn't me btw, just letting you know, I appreciate the feedback.) The "filled" part made me assumed you meant ranked draft. In normals I advice you just say "support or feed" from now on. {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} Also, what Dmitko said.
There is this mode in the game called Draft Pick for non-ranked games you should check it out some time.
: PERMABANNED FOR PRIVATE CHAT - Update and conclusion
Okay so you definitely deserved to be banned but you've been banned in the wrong way. Riot should never be able to use *private* chats as a method to punish someone. They are able to read it, that's fine and I know that when I use their service but that doesn't mean they can do whatever they want with it. It's private for a reason and we don't want another incident like Facebooks'.
Silent Note (EUNE)
: Why are people asking about Legendary Kill?
I didn't even notice it was removed? Are you sure it isn't still in the game lol.
Threxes (EUW)
: Ok, now you just dont get what i am saying lol. You know Riot as a company has departments that shares information with each other its similar how the financial and marketing department work together to help each other better understand customer behavior , it doesn't mean people from different department start working on something they dont know how to do. its simply means the champion design team has to work with the balance team and vice a versa because as they release a new champion the game balance is going to change. Its business management 101 Its ok not everybody have to agree with me
They don't share every bit of information because there is a risk of it leaking out. That's why anyone who's not working with the new champion doesn't know that much about it until the release.
Aezander (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Wortelsapjuh,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=Z9RyLHm7,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-06-06T23:39:06.394+0000) > > There is nothing to cry about because they're fictional characters. Can't we shed fictional tears then ? {{summoner:31}}
Silent Note (EUNE)
: You do realise there are way more male champions than female ones, right? I just checked it for you, and only 36% of the champions are females, while 64% are males. So if anything, cry about why Riot only releases male champions once they release a male champion while having such a big majority already. This way your whining makes absolutely 0 sense.
There is nothing to cry about because they're fictional characters.
Silent Note (EUNE)
: How do you know if there isn't a hidden algorhythm? Like with K/DA orbs, me, all my friends, every streamer I saw were experiencing the same thing. A few (3-5) orbs were extremely awful and disappointing, then they were followed by 1 really good drop, then a few crappy drops again, then again one very decent one. The Battle Academy orbs just seem to be consistently decent, and full of epic drops.
It's not hidden. They always tell people that after a few unlucky orbs, chests or whatever you have a higher chance of getting something good out of it. Every orb is the same.
Herô (EUW)
: Suspended, cut of from all social; except....
MrCryKoda (EUW)
: what if we dont own the dragonslayer braum skin? what happens then ?
It's either an entirely different skin like the KDA ones or it's something you can unlock so it's the same as the gold championship chromas. It's probably the second one as it says chroma specifically. The gold chromas are unlockable but only usable if you own the skin. You can unlock them and buy the skin later. It's shitty just like the passes but people buy it so they won't stop making them.
: IRL Clock
Buy. Clock.
Murdarici (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Wortelsapjuh,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=xE6x4GeR,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-05-30T21:46:38.243+0000) > > Yes Oui*
Sorry I don't speak Croissant.
Sylisium (EUW)
: a player use my account
Rinns (EUNE)
: Esports Elders Idea! please notice me!
I don't think you'll find much people in that age range and if you do they probably aren't that good because they play casual when they're off work. Now if you manage to actually find good players with that age there is another MAJOR problem called the audience. Do you actually think people will watch this? Are there sponsors for this? Is it possible to make profit? I don't think so.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: dont have anything useful to say, don't say it
Like all of your replies in this thread? Lol.
Luciferrx (EUNE)
: So why you say they can buy it??When you can get ban?Its not Worth doing it..
I can get a boards ban for linking stuff like that. The accounts they buy are either botted or inactive accounts and won't trigger the system that easily. Also 3 euros is like nothing, you can buy one beer for that. It's completely worth it if suggested system is implemented.
Luciferrx (EUNE)
: Show me right now 3 euro accounts.Go ahead. And if you didnt know...You can get ban for that.Riot didnt say "you can buy other accounts".Just so you know.
Lol are you twelve? Why would I link you to something that can get me banned whahaha.
Luciferrx (EUNE)
: Brining lv 30 smurfs accounts...gl with that.Exping lv 30 isnt easy.And bringint it higher elo too..and then lose it.Gl with that too.
Yeah or you know, just buy one for 3 euros..
Luciferrx (EUNE)
: If riot wouldnt be stupid….leaving games again and again...should be punished harder.Even ban.At least from ranked.So if riot use brain they can do that.And who want to abuse that to go afk again and again it wont be Worth.But hei..lets trade high elo you and me.Like this you lose your account so i wont lose lp.Dah. Beside riot can simply delete the part with duq and be only solo q.So no one abouse shit.
Yeah just delete a major part of the games ranked experience to satisfy a small percentage of players whom don't understand the consequences pls!
gideon108 (EUW)
: League of Legends survey for school
Deprecious (EUNE)
: He was being harassed, and he told his team mates that he will report them for that because it's against the rules, which is true, now why is stating the obvious considered breaking the rules ? what %%%%ing logic is that ? If someone on the street is harassing you, and you tell him that if they doesn't stop you will call the cops, should you be %%%%ing fined for that ?
Not true. This guy was more like someone that stands in front of a door not willing to move and telling people that are pushing him to pass through that he is gonna call the cops on them.
Luciferrx (EUNE)
: Again….no 1 is stupid enough to get leaverbuster +losing lp. And high elo lose lp?????wtf you talking about.People wanna climb.And high elo players wanna reach rank 1 why would they lose lp? Low elo..if you boost maybe.But thats it.You still lose lp and get punished with leaverbuster. NOT WORTH AT ALL.
My god it's not hard to understand. People win trade in high elo as well so why wouldn't they do something similar with this system? It's funny that you think leaverbuster is a big deal to these people lol.
Luciferrx (EUNE)
: I doubht your premade will leave the game to lose 20 lp...But hei...maybe they do what do i know. I wouldnt for sure.
In high elo they will, and in low elo smurfs won't care if they lose 20lp to help a friends main account.
Deprecious (EUNE)
: At the moment, you can get banned only for being negative in your games, i repeat, being negative, not flaming. Now, please explain to me how this guy deserved a chat restrict for that chat log, i'll wait https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/6rEidrMZ-unfair-chat-restriction
He was report calling and had a negative impact on the team. A chat restriction is the smallest punishment possible and I think that's justified in this case.
Deprecious (EUNE)
: I'm sorry friend, but if anyone is accusing me of something, i have the right to defend myself, anywhere in the world, except for north korea and league of legends
Wow excellent example!! But yes, you do have the right to defend yourself, in a civil and mature manner. There is however this right, which is one of the most important rights we have, it is the right to remain silent. I suggest you use the latter.
Fhaca (EUW)
: Behaviours Specialists at Riots Games are underperforming
Lol the system isn't failing, it works just fine. It just needs an upgrade to detect inters faster and 14-day ban them after an x amount of games. The majority of perma banned players reform and will never be perma banned again, it's just that you hear a lot more about the small percentage that do get banned over and over. The part about players going to mobile is just hilarious to me, how can you even believe that??
Deprecious (EUNE)
: The problem is not getting banned for telling people to kill themselves, the problem is getting banned for defending yourself in a polite and civilized matter with arguments when you are getting flamed.
Give me one example lol, I'll wait.
Deprecious (EUNE)
: You also forget, no body will pay for skins, in a game that you can't play because it crashes, or a game where you get banned for being "negative"
If your game crashes it's on your end. And getting banned for telling people to kill themselves isn't just negative it's immature and stupid.
: Depends if you have moral standarts or not^^
{{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}}
: unfortunately if a company decides to put most of their budget into designing microtransactions and overall monetization, there won't be anything left for gameplay, bugs and crime/punishment. nowadays we even have AAA games that are buggy as hell and unfun to play but have top notch microtransactions so Vorz is kinda right, Riot needs to shift the funds from the monetization department to the gameplay and behaviour departments
But they won't because the goal of a business is to make as much profit as possible. And sometimes people forget that this is a free game and the company has to pay their employees, domains, rent, servers and whatever else there is to pay.
: Rito need new People who actually are Gamers not Skin sellers.
Marketing and player behaviour are two completely separate teams.
: If I reached "You reached the maximum of this test which is 125, write an e-mail to xyz and ask for a personalized test and even become the member of our group" on a mensa test, then I won't lose lol matches anymore? Because I still do. {{sticker:sg-janna}}
No that just means you have an above average IQ. No one said that high IQ = winning games because that's just straight up false.
Murdarici (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Wortelsapjuh,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=sRUNBWoB,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-21T13:29:09.290+0000) > > 100-110 IQ is standard, it's the majority. Anything under 80 is dumb. Anything above 130 is really smart. > > You're saying people who can join MENSA and most of the office workers are the only smart people IN THE WORLD. Yes, you said that. But in fact the majority of the humans is smart, how else did we make it this far? no 100-110 is not majority, under 100 is majority office worker majority are above 100, sure some slip trough system and some are dump but still got there, also some hand workers are smart but did not got a chance to rise because of poverty or family problems We got so far because dumb people sustain countries and economy with hard manual labor work while are manipulated and ruled by smart people, i didn't say dumb people are bad, they are a necessity, but they are more then smart ones, they are easy manipulated and they think in groups and have hard time to think for themself. Also they breed more, hence they are more, dumb people just married and make kids they don't care they have no homes or money to raise them. While smart people first they think to make a career, to make money, to buy an hose, to be stable before making kids, then they think, well a kid is enough is hard to educate two or more, and to provide them a good life, maybe they go for two , but dumb ones go for 5 in 1 room apartment living from social help.
I don't think you understand how that works. Poor families have more children to either get money for it or have the children work for more income. It has nothing to do with being dumb, if anything these people are smart for doing the best they can in their situation. People in wealthier countries have kids later on because they already have chances and planned parenthood. My grandfather for example was one of 11 while I only have one sibling. Because poor families have more children they have more income and the next generation will do much better if the environment changes with them.
Murdarici (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Wortelsapjuh,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=sRUNBWoB,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-05-21T11:29:41.809+0000) > > Don't think that's true but ok. you dont think theres more stupid people then smart is in the word ? wow, they are actually way way many. People that can join MENSA are 2% of world population and there's only 135iq (approximately sice iq can't relay be measured, mensa don't use iq) Most office workers are around 100-110iq and they are not majority. Rest of the population is under 100iq which is majority and are pretty dump! sadly but true we are surrounded everywhere everyday by really dumb and shallow people!
100-110 IQ is standard, it's the majority. Anything under 80 is dumb. Anything above 130 is really smart. You're saying people who can join MENSA and most of the office workers are the only smart people IN THE WORLD. Yes, you said that. But in fact the majority of the humans is smart, how else did we make it this far?
Murdarici (EUNE)
: there are more stupid people than smart people in the world, so statistically more stupid people than smart people in an online game or online forum or online whatever, deal with it
: So why exactly is blind pick stil in the game? Why? "Cuz new players are too stupid for draft" Rly ?
: how do i delete lol
Me not know how computer work pls help {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}}
Amalun (EUNE)
: Remember the 80's and 90's?
You remember the 80's 90's? **Age group 15-37** lol
: or you can vote to avoid a player for a specific number of games for instance someone hard ints and you click to avoid them in your next 3 queues streamers can have this to avoid stream snipers more consistently too
If they don't want to get streamsniped they shouldn't stream. They know it's a risk and they're willing to take it. Avoiding people for queue's will result in strategies to queue up with people to wintrade or block that one challenger person so that he can never start a game. Bad idea.
: Avoid player
This is so easily exploitable in high elo that they will never implement it. How can you not see that.
: smurfing on euw and looking for duo
Doesn't that count as boosting? Don't want to risk my account but want to start playing ranked a bit more :/
: The new IG skins looked very familiar for a reason
Looks nothing like eachother. If you think the faces look similar, look at the nose shape, the eye shape, the ears. Even the jawline. You're on some crazy shit rn.
Mammoett (EUW)
: Riot boards bullshittery
When someone provides no context or valid arguments it's an instant downvote. These threads almost always have an absurd title which kind of acts like clickbait for me and this results in one more downvote from me on the thread. If a post has a large number of downvotes or upvotes I click on it as well and I try to find out why that is. If I think it's justified I'll vote the same, if not I'll go against the crowd.
: Is there any way for animated backgrounds in champ select?
If it's not done by Riot but a third party it might be against the rules and you could get banned. Even if it's just for cosmetic purposes.
Ahriiana (EUW)
: Need wholesome ppl for normals or smth
I'll add you, playing ARAM/Normals later today with some friends. You can join if you want to.
Tarolock (EUNE)
: >The option to remove the most frustrating elements of the ARAM was there so you need the option to remove ARAM from ARAM? where is the logic in that? >1) remove certain champs from the pool this means removing aram from aram, nothing good comes from it >2) give the accounts the entire champ pool during ARAM. i dont really think this should be a thing, you should be able to make aram only accounts, but you should pay a price for it, i kinda like the current system where you can absolutely make an account just for aram and unlock the op champs, but you either have to dodge a lot of games or you have to deal with the 3 weeks of free champs added to your pool >And their reasoning is are totally non-nonsensical! These 2 quotes really make little to no sense: "But the bans were so targeted to a select group of champions that we saw an overall decrease in champion diversity." you got the wrong idea here... the problem is not that ppl banned certain champs/group of champs, the problem here is diversity, i dont really like playing vs lux/xerath etc, cos they can kill you from the other side of the map, but once in a while its good to see them, they make me rethink my tactics maybe go for a different build that will help me deal with them and in the end it will help me learn something that i can use on summoners rift so totally banning a group of champs is not good for the game, thats not how aram should be played >We are to believe that skewed the diversity to a point that made banning not worth it? Please. you forget the rerolls/dodges, as soon as you ban the "viable"/"op" champs ppl will use their reroll for better champs or even dodge just because they cant play the champ they get, and with that YES it made banning not worth it
> so you need the option to remove ARAM from ARAM? where is the logic in that? No, by removing frustrating champions you don't take away the all random and all mid part. > this means removing aram from aram, nothing good comes from it No, removing certain champions still doesn't give a player the option to pick ANY champion the WANT to pick. > i dont really think this should be a thing, you should be able to make aram only accounts, but you should pay a price for it, i kinda like the current system where you can absolutely make an account just for aram and unlock the op champs, but you either have to dodge a lot of games or you have to deal with the 3 weeks of free champs added to your pool Okay so by your logic this would be removing ARAM from ARAM. You don't have a champ? You can't play them here! It's the same thing, you have a slightly smaller champion pool. > you forget the rerolls/dodges, as soon as you ban the "viable"/"op" champs ppl will use their reroll for better champs or even dodge just because they cant play the champ they get, and with that YES it made banning not worth it If people dodge because they want to play a specific champion in ARAM they shouldn't play ARAM. It's **random**, it's even in the damn name. And for rerolls, people reroll all the time since it's been there. It's not suddenly being used because of bans.
Murdarici (EUNE)
: aram need to be for fun and to chill not spend time to ban, and get flamed because you didn't ban x champ so chill, was stupid idea to introduce it not to remove it about the aram accounts, they dealt with them by introducing more champions that you can get then the ones you have, they can fix it even more but let all champs free in aram like that no more aram accounts, here I agree with you
Bans actually made the mode more fun because you didn't have to play against the OP champs every game.
Show more

Wortelsapjuh

Level 172 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion