GLurch (EUW)
: I don't think this game should have caused it, as it shouldn't interact with League of Legends in any way. Anyways, I know there is no real way to proof it and that is the exact problem. You can just try [submitting a ticket to the Riot Support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new), but they will probably tell you, that they can't tell you what programs you used (to prevent modders and scripters from improving their cheat clients) and that they can't unban you. But the possibility of you being unbanned, because of this Supporter checking your case again and finding nothing, is always there (although it is as unlikely as getting hit by a lightning, because if the system found something already, I don't think the past would suddenly change and the Supporter would find nothing).
so yeah i will just get this message "We won't be able to go into the specifics of an account's exploit abuse, as divulging this information could compromise future investigations. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns." so they did not help me in any way , if i make another account and a third party program is still affecting it without me knowing it will instantly get banned . And i do not even plan on making a new account because i have played on this once since season 2 , and this is a very dumb way to stop playing a game....
GLurch (EUW)
: First off, you will very likely never be unbanned. Only if you can proof to not have used any 3rd party programs. Now, I often see people thinking 3rd party programs means "scripts". It doesn't. Have you used ANYTHING for League of Legends, besides League of Legends? Maybe a custom skin program, a replay program, a zoom program,...
well to be honest this did happen when i tried to isntal Stronghold Crusader Extreme , an old game i played years ago https://postimg.org/image/c59hj8lrx/ but else than that i did not try to download anything else ... how can i prove that i have not used any 3rd party programs ???
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: >you are entirely responsible for maintaining [...] any and all activities Letting your cousin play on your account does not correspond to this, you know that right?
umm he was right there next to him lol he had full control of his account and he was responsible about it lol
: i am permabanned for a idiotic reason
WOW all these retarded comments on how this should be perma banned cus you broke the rules hahahahh first of all how do they even know when someone is account sharing wtf ? Second - many many many many many people that i know are sharing accounts they are my friends and none of them got even a warning lol... but rito pls PERMA BAN for giving his cousin to play games ? If he buys ELO boost ok ban him np but this sht is just ridicilous lol ... it was 3 fking games and he plays the game for 5 years ... hope you get unbanned this is bs.
EmEx (EUW)
: you get more passive gold now so even if you lose lane you can make a comeback
EVERYONE gets more passive gold
pdX Lye (EUW)
: "it's broken" yeah, this is so much information you provide there >.>
everyone is way op and it's a lose lane lose game right now cus of all the gold changes and stuff which is not cool and i could talk like 20 lines what is just op but i think you already know
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
LightTrack (EUNE)
: 11 November.
isn't that the season end? or did i missunderstood?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: I can't login EUW 07/07/2015
something very weird is happening... riot hacked ?
Rioter Comments
xBerzZzerk (EUNE)
: Error that I have no internet connection
I have the same problem, but i can connect on EUNE just fine but can't on euw ... is it rito or ?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Niiael (EUNE)
: Well of course you won't get punished for something you said a year ago, that would be silly.
He isn't saying you will get punished , only that it is possible.
GripaAviara (EUNE)
: Yeah, saying report is like saying "you're so worthless you shouldn't be allowed to play this game"
Umm i don't fully agree on this because some people flame only in team chat so the 5 enemies should know that the person is flaming because they cant hear them... saying report in all chat is legit if the flamer flames in team chat only.
Niiael (EUNE)
: Well you aren't really. You reported a person on their ally's claim which is more often then not, false. Now it HAPPENED to not be false, since the played got punished. The message is just a reply everyone who reported him get, but I'm sure you know that. Also, if you are actually helping to keep the community a better place (let's say your report was justified) that doesn't give you the right to misbehave yourself. They are completely unrelated. Can't really know if you deserved restrictions or not, so I won't comment on that.
Well thats why i like the new player reform system ... If he didn't flame his reports would disapear and he wouldnt get the ban. Just how many times i played with people who raged in my team and were like '' omg i didn't flame at all they just hate me '' in all chat ...
: You seem pretty genuine in your post. It's nice to see people realize that not flaming is actually helping them play better, and enjoy the game more. I hope you get some clarification ^^
Yeah it's just sad i realised it way too late after playing one and a half year just saying shit to other players. I regret it .. not worth...
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
I absolutley agree the system isn't flawless , i was probably one in those 6000 somone said something about .
: Insults are easy to find and nobody questions that. How does the system wants to find out what players did and where they ran into?!
Umm if system works on finding insults .. would saying '' oh fuk mb sorry guys'' would detect ''fu*k'' word and punish the person who said it multiple times or ?
: Banned for absolutley no reason (not a cry thread)
just wanted to add , few days ago i reported somone in the enemy team for verbal abuse (he didn't flame in all chat) because somone in the enemy team told me to report him , and like 15 mins later i got a message .. ''support feedback'' it said something '' a player you recently reported has been punished. Thank you for trying to keep this community a better place'' or something like that ... i guess what im trying to say is that i love new player reform system that is currently in the beta , it seems quite fair, but still can't figure out why i got restricted if i am ''keeping the community a beter place'' :( rip dfg.
: Well, if you're sure that you didn't do anything wrong you should contact the player support, they should help you if you are innocent. Good luck with that :)
I contacted the support right away thx for your advice but will most likely have to wait for like a week for a response since they have to redirect me to player support specialists. I just am currently on a tilt becasuse i have been winning like 6 games out of 7 and i obviously wouldnt make that much if i was flaming /trolling and plat was just 2 wins away for me to reach it :(
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: A lot of suggestions on the boards aren't great. Some are good conceptually but bad in practice. Few are good. Even fewer are great.
Strongly disagree xd even so rito could change stuff here and there , more details on the map . Doesnt have to be big jus that i played this game for 2-3 years and the biggest change i experienced was the actual map change. If you want me to talk , i have a few ideas on my mind right now :s
Rioter Comments
Dagreatking (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=asddsaasdad,realm=EUW,application-id=ln3nNJrX,discussion-id=3AvfxmcJ,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2015-05-19T11:01:51.034+0000) > > Lol i think you are wrong. Im just gonna kill the elo boosting services first. Who would wait 5+ mins every game (increasing by 2-3 mins whenever he afks again) and elo boost costs money i heard. Would be easier to buy the elo boost than this long wait time shi7. I i repeat it would be rare af because noone likes to wait that long just cus his friend is in promotions. I dont want to boost my friends anyways cus we play the league against eachother (in a good way), competitevly. Would be abused bu rarely and it would help the other 98% players you arent thinking about well friends would wait ofc. that's the whole point. and one promo is three games. they would do it in less than an afternoon. I don't agree when you say that friends wouldn't do it
My own brother wont even duo with me .
Dagreatking (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=asddsaasdad,realm=EUW,application-id=ln3nNJrX,discussion-id=3AvfxmcJ,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2015-05-19T10:34:12.806+0000) > > Yeah i see your point but it i highly unlikely. His friend would get punished for 10 games x5 more mins waiting(At first), and believe me noone wants to wait xd. This would still apply only for duos but i think it would be xtremley rare and even if they do it , it wouldnt even matter cuz problems of all other players would banish when they find themselves in a 2-3-4v5 situation lol, it wouldn't be rare. It would be common practice. get a smurf and start playing ranked with a friend and boost him through his promotionals. so no, it WOULD be abused. Not to mention how the already existing boosting services would start selling it it as a feature. So no, absolutely not unless you want to erode the worth of leagues ranked system.
Lol i think you are wrong. Im just gonna kill the elo boosting services first. Who would wait 5+ mins every game (increasing by 2-3 mins whenever he afks again) and elo boost costs money i heard. Would be easier to buy the elo boost than this long wait time shi7. I i repeat it would be rare af because noone likes to wait that long just cus his friend is in promotions. I dont want to boost my friends anyways cus we play the league against eachother (in a good way), competitevly. Would be abused bu rarely and it would help the other 98% players you arent thinking about
jana (EUW)
: well there is only one way to implement a fair 1o1 and thatwould be a champion based queue, where you would get matched agains the same champion. in this case there would be a fair 1o1, but you wouldnt be able to play alot of 1o1's on champions who are bad in 1o1. so while zed, riven and lee would be the kings of this most champions wouldnt be played. everything else where both player pick diffrent champions will result in a binare picking phase where the firstpick has a huge advantage/dissadvantage. about your argument: > it still is 90% skill its only 90% skill if both players play the same champion. and even then some champions would be 90% luck (for example who gets the first skillshot hit etc.) and i guess you would want diffrent champs, in this case the skill requirement would "be able to counterpick or bann all cpounters".
About the first pick advantage , they can make a blind draft mode. Means you would ban 3 champs both and than both would pick at the same time. About the 90% skill, yeah you can say skillshots are 10% luck... doesnt matter still because you can dodge every single one of them. And what i said before about blind draft wouldnt affect the counterpicks. I see that some champs would be perma ban but it would be the same as in 5v5 rankeds
DELDE115 (EUW)
: It is quite the oposite, look at URF, the more it stayed less people played it, I even got bored of it 4 days later. The problem with the 1 vs 1 game mode is that Champion select was longer than the actual match. Wait 6 minutes and play for 2, people dont want that. That is why it failed really hard.
I think you are very wrong about urf , everyone on every forum wants urf back , there is a topic about it you can go read xd . Easiest way to fix the waiting time would be to put 10 sec champion picks and 15 sec ban , would decrease the time alot. Plan your bans / picks ahead
: > [{quoted}](name=asddsaasdad,realm=EUW,application-id=ln3nNJrX,discussion-id=3AvfxmcJ,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-05-18T21:49:11.534+0000) > > Give the team with an afk loss prevent or atleast less LP loss but if they in promotion than definetly loss prevent. This would be far to easy to abuse as premades would take turns afk'ing to rotate the penalty also people would just leave once a game looked like a loss, like a promo for instance.
What i said to the guy before.
Coxis (EUNE)
: they will leave. think about the duo's. one of them has a promo match. they see they are losing, so the other one takes it on himself. leaves and get pusnished, but his friend gets a loss prevented, therefore not losing his promotional.
Yeah i see your point but it i highly unlikely. His friend would get punished for 10 games x5 more mins waiting(At first), and believe me noone wants to wait xd. This would still apply only for duos but i think it would be xtremley rare and even if they do it , it wouldnt even matter cuz problems of all other players would banish when they find themselves in a 2-3-4v5 situation
: > [{quoted}](name=asddsaasdad,realm=EUW,application-id=ln3nNJrX,discussion-id=3AvfxmcJ,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-05-18T21:49:11.534+0000) > > Instantly punish the afk guy , at beggining that 5 min low priority que would do but if they do it more times , increase the punishment for 2-5 mins but as everyone can have net issues reset it like every 2-3 months. Give the team with an afk loss prevent or atleast less LP loss but if they in promotion than definetly loss prevent. There you go , noone would leave games if they know they will get punished and life would be better. Doesn't really help the genuine innocent victims of internet troubles now does it?
You cant have that much internet problems. Even so , this should be applied only to ranked games, and people who know they got internet problems shouldn't play rankeds until they fix them.
Rioter Comments
Nedooo (EUW)
: [Suggestion] New ping System ?
I really like the warded ping, but since so many good people have chat restrictions , i would put a Good job ping there too.
PauIo (EUW)
: Two ribbons in a row ^^
: Why they would put a 1vs1 ladder in a Team work based game?
I rarely see teamwork in solo que , only when im skyped up with my friends i can play right.
Hansiman (EUNE)
: Magmachamber was a planned 1v1 map, but it got cancelled. Riot had an event where you could queue up for 1v1 matches in the Howling Abyss, but in reality very few people actually used it more than once.
What i said to the guy before.
Jens Cole (EUNE)
: just thought of one reason why it would be bad if it's ranked and draft then the one who picks first will lose most of the time. making it blind pick wouldn't fix it as it would make it luck based (pretty much how blind pick works, but it's not so competitive).
Blind draft would actually work real good in this case xD
DELDE115 (EUW)
: Because in 2013 1 vs 1 snowdown Showdown was a complete failure. That is why they are no longer going to do that tyoe of gamemode.
If it was a permanent ranked gamemode , i belive people would play it much more , i played the mode and had a bit fun till i realised im not getting anything of it, ranked would fix the problem.
Rioter Comments
Hansiman (EUNE)
: You're comparing a limitation to the ability to chat in an online computer game to a death penalty? Seriously? Can you provide a source to your claim about that percentage? Also, the fact that you've gotten so many games restricted strongly implies that this is not your first punishment. You have gotten many chances. You can also say that the restriction is your 2nd chance to show that you've improved, because you can still play the game.
Im gonna stick with my anyone can report you cus they are mad theory.Why the hell would anyone even think of flaming after being punished for 750 games. Noone is that much braindead
Kauski (EUNE)
: vayne can do that to draven too with full DMG/crit build
No she cant xD it gives way lover dmg than to draven on q
Show more

asddsaasdad

Level 30 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion