Til Salgs (EUW)
: Change is good!
lakisha2001 (EUNE)
: Pls read this, im addicted
What are terms and conditions?
Glaiver (EUNE)
: Post your all time favorite skin splash art ♥
https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/champions-skins/skin-release/something-lurks-deep-sea I really like anything with moody, dark water involved. Atlantean Syndra, Crabgot, and the new Dark Waters Diana are honourable mentions. (Edit: I suck at linking pictures apparently. It's _Deep Sea Nami_ if you don't want to click the link)
Rioter Comments
: Whatever u do to aatrox, but dont make this his voice...
_Welcome, to the League of Legends Champion Spotlight, featuring-_ {{champion:266}} **"I AM AATROX, COMMANDER OF EDGE AND LORD OF LOUD SHOUTING! TREMBLE, INFERIOR THINGS, BEFORE MY GOOFY RUSSIAN ACCENT, MY ENORMOUS SWORD, AND MY MIGHTY TRIPLE SLASH ACTION COMBO!"** {{champion:92}} "But. That last one's my thing..." {{champion:266}} **"FOOL! MINE IS SUPERIOR! COME! FIGHT!"**
TatarQiz (EUNE)
: Awwww <3 These ideas are really nice! I am glad to see that I am not the only Evelynn lover here :D. {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}}
Thank you. I bet Riot could do something really special with her next skin if they focus on making her transition between visibility and invisibility more thematically engaging
Hydnoras (EUW)
: Riven is just as much skillshot based. Just with a shorter range.
RemZero22 (EUW)
: Who is Lux's lover?
Perhaps she's just a single pringle
: Whatever u do to aatrox, but dont make this his voice...
It looks like they turned him into a skill-shot based Riven...
íGengar (EUW)
: What was the fiasco of the blood moon one? Is it garbage? I play Evelynn now and then and I don't think any of her current skins look better than the vanilla model ^^
Essentially, people were disappointed by the first new skin specifically designed for Evelynn's new model. Criticisms included the Bloodmoon Evelynn skin not matching up well in terms of quality with the other Bloodmoon skins, as well as being a bit dull/boring in it's execution. It was a similar problem to that of the Valentine's Day Xayah and Rakan skins, but to a slightly lesser extent (because those skins were _really_ bad).
Rioter Comments
Glaiver (EUNE)
: Why are people obsessed with fighting instead of farming? Farm = guaranteed gold
This game is a Multiplayer Online _Battle_ Arena game. Not Stardew Valley. Every ability you have is in some way tailored towards combat, and that's probably supposed to be the _fun_ part of the game, despite it not being the actual objective. If you don't get that a game is supposed to be fun, you might be missing out. I mean, you _could_ sit there, waiting for enemies a hundred times weaker than you to get to low enough HP that you can eventually smack them for the gold for the entire game (cough-Nasus-cough). But most people associate fun with more stimulating interactions. Such as, fighting. It's the same with games like Overwatch: you don't go into it thinking "oh boy, I can't wait to slowly follow a payload around the map til it reaches the end!" You think "I wanna shoot things, or blow them up, and I wanna do it now." That's the fun part. What's not to get?
GreyfellD (EUW)
: Champions with the most mobility usually win
>I wonder how much the meta would change if only champions with low, no or irrelevant mobility could be the only champs to use {{summoner:4}} . That would actually be amazing. It would give immobile champions some much needed love in terms of mobility. However, there's no way Riot would do this... {{sticker:cass-cry}} Maybe they could make a rune, which gives immobile champions some kind of mobility spell. Or halves the cooldown of flash, or something like that...
: Unbanning Long-term League Players
First: Riot won't "reach" this. So burn your hopes. Second: No one could possibly take your views on player behaviour seriously, with a name like that. Third: You ain't slick; you're not getting your account back. Finally: It's a bad idea because it will essentially make some players untouchable, and that's blatant favouritism. No one player should be any more, or less valued than another. It doesn't _matter_ if you started playing last week, of if you've been playing since season 1; if you're toxic, you've got to go. Loyalty will never excuse abusive in-game behaviour.
: > [{quoted}](name=kiwishrew,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=EhdL81Ei,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-06-10T00:31:30.030+0000) > > Well shit. I was really looking forward to playing Jinx again... Guess I&#x27;ll go back to playing Ziggs, Lux and Taliyah mid :/ Oh Irelia mid is meta.
Maybe I'll just go back to Overwatch then. New Irelia in my midlane? Nope. I play other lanes SPECIFICALLY to avoid the broken shit that gets put in toplane...
: >What have I missed? Banner of Command got reworked and is going to get DFG'ed. Ezreal is breaking another item interaction, Kai'Sa is busted. We got a new champ that is an assassin support that has a resetting AoE Darius ult. >Exactly how much did they destroy marksmen? Crit marksmen don't hit a massive power spike at Shiv and IE. They have to scale into the late game. On hit carries and lane bullies (MF and Draven) are busted, and Guinsoo's is still the same busted piece of shit it was. > What the heck is "Clash"? 5 man competitive mode. Basically pro play for us plebs. It's ranked 5's from back in the day but with more prizes. You buy into it (with BE obtainable Clash tickets) and the more you buy in, the better your reward when you win.
Well shit. I was really looking forward to playing Jinx again... Guess I'll go back to playing Ziggs, Lux and Taliyah mid :/
Rioter Comments
King Lego (EUNE)
: Question about Taliyah Jungle
I think it'll be fine, and if anything a little underwhelming due to the large cooldown on her ult. Without her ult, I reckon she'll just be "ok" at ganking. It's a shame Riot keep making these champions that look so fun to play, but then get ruined by pros, forcing Riot to nerf them for everyone else. They shouldn't value the pros over the community...
TheFgtRat (EUW)
: A Soccer theamed game mode
fak tart (EUNE)
: i got banned
Make a new account and _prove_ you've learnt from your mistake by not getting it banned.
Zanador (EUNE)
: Except it doesn't. Febos and Zyzyx are correct. It's an ancient greek word.
Egillion (EUW)
: Mordekaiser is back ! Riot has done it again !
Well I finally learnt what "META" stands for today
: The more I read what you posted, the slower I read for some odd reason.
I used way too many commas
Raoul (EUW)
: Pyke could really use an escape tool...
He has enough mobility. Not all assassins have to have such cowardly mechanics.
: You forgot {{champion:163}} E And i agree anti-mobility spells are really cool from a design perspective.
Actually I meant her E from the start, not W. Got my abilities mixed up
Scrinnid (EUNE)
: Good concept but it doesn't fit pyke. Here's the reason: He is the vengence of drowned and betrayed. He himself was betrayed and thus drowned(or so he feels), and as such, he is lurking in the shadows, taking out anyone in his list. And thats the part they were focusing on: his fury and rage giving him immense strength when he sees his pray. And at this point, they nailed it. However, his passive also represents that he was already weakened by the waters, so that strength came at the price: he can't survive at all if he gets hit again
I would say your reasoning for why it doesn't fit Pyke is exactly that; _yours._ Subjective. As is mine. But whilst I respect your opinion, I disagree with it on the basis of his lore, and the mood of his voice-over and trailer. You say Pyke is furious and ragey, and that that is the part of him that Riot tried to capture. But I don't think rage and fury are his defining qualities at all, and that if this was what Riot tried to capture, it was a mistake. When I think of furious and ragey, I think of Renekton. I think of Sion. I think of Rek'Sai. And I don't believe Pyke fits in with any of them. He never bellows, or roars, or announces himself loudly. He's subtle, restrained, quiet, and suggestive in a way that spells "inevitable doom". He murmurs threats and whispers of dark, crushing depths. He disappears into mist and incorporeal waters, only to appear behind you and whisper "you look familiar..." From his trailer and lore, I have assessed Pyke to be more _"sinister"_, than furious or rage-filled as you have suggested. Think Elise. Think Thresh. Think Evelynn. These are all champions who "lurk" and threaten, and whisper chilling, detailed evils, and prey on innocent victims. They don't violently maim and kill everyone in their path; that's what a furious, or rage-filled champion like Renekton, or Sion would do. Therefore, to my mind, Pyke is right at home with the "sinister" group, and I think his kit should have reflected this thematic. The only part of his kit I can credit with capturing this tone is the spell that makes him turn invisible. Everything else is fast and visceral, and it just doesn't make sense to me. Nonetheless, I maintain that I respect your opinion. EDIT: Although come to think of it, Thresh and Elise's kits hardly scream subtle either... perhaps it's just difficult to make a slow kit in League :/
: You are right about most things, but you might lack experience in transfering a character theme into a kit. No offense, but there might be more to it than imagination. For one thing I personally believe is that it's kinda hard to put a slowness to an assassin playstyle. He was supposed to be a innovative new supporter design, not a second Nautilus. And his dash is hardly comparable with Ekko's. The stun is also not random as long as it's not buggy for a reason..
>you might lack experience in transfering a character theme into a kit. No offense, but there might be more to it than imagination. Yeah, I'm aware of this :( >He was supposed to be a innovative new supporter design, not a second Nautilus. I suppose my ideas could risk him seeming too similar to Nautilus in some respects. I remain disappointed that his theme was not embraced as whole-heartedly as it could have been, despite how demanding that may have been from a technical standpoint. >And his dash is hardly comparable with Ekko's. The stun is also not random as long as it's not buggy for a reason.. When I say random, I just don't get why he has a stun on a mobility move. It feels to me like it was randomly slapped on because he didn't have enough CC to be a support yet. And when I compare it to Ekko, it's only in the respect that it has a clone mechanic going on, so it ends up resembling Ekko's theme. I think I failed to accurately convey what I meant when comparing it to Ekko's dash.
Rioter Comments
Pyrosen (EUW)
: Who's the most rewarding champion if you can hit skill-shots?
{{champion:99}} is satisfying, but it's pretty easy to hit her skill-shots. {{champion:115}} same as above, although harder to hit ult, and requires good knowledge of when and how to use the Satchel Charge. {{champion:222}} is a weird choice, but I have to include her simply for how AMAZING it feels to execute enemies from across the map with a rocket. The rapture of your passive triggering a couple of seconds after pressing R is just unholy. Her W is also rather hard to hit, but it chunks HP at later levels, and the slow/reveal is nice. Her chompers are "technically" a skillshot, but they're more about positioning and less about predicting and reaction times (putting them on top of someone who just got Morgana Q'd is hilarious). Sadly her skill-shotting becomes less relevant late game... Still, I would argue that Jinx is fun if you can skill-shot. Would have mentioned {{champion:101}} too, as he is basically the king of skillshots, but you struck him off the list.
: Is riot points are cryptocurrency?
No. Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
: Which are your favourite mid lane champions and which are the strongest right now
My favourites are {{champion:115}}, {{champion:134}}, {{champion:99}} and {{champion:127}}. I don't know who is good and bad right now because I haven't played since Zoe release. Also your favourites make me want to murder you but we're all friends here {{sticker:sg-ahri-2}}
L0onster (EUW)
: A sad story. (Over 8 accounts banned)
>Maybe it is riot way of saying F off, we don't want people like me playing. Well... yes? Obviously. I'm sorry, but of course Riot don't want toxic people playing. It's not sad, it's a victory. And after 14 accounts, it's astonishing that you haven't learnt to just not talk in the chat. Even if you can't help but be toxic, you should at least be able to control what you type in chat. Otherwise, of course you deserve to be banned. Anyone who inflicts toxicity on others deserves to be banned :/
Gabresol (EUW)
: Riot has too much mercy
>I really do not care how hard the player numbers drop, I believe a purge of everyone not using the chat as intended is needed! Just get done watching Infinity War? That's cute, but Riot really does not care what you believe in as an individual. They have to make money, and they will lose money if they implement your half-baked solution. Now, if the community suddenly boycotted the game because of toxicity, Riot might do something. But as it stands, the player-base only continues to grow, and by extension, money. Why fix something which isn't broken?
You're being negative, even out of the game... I'd say there's lesson to be learnt here in real life, too, _regardless_ of whether or not you want to acknowledge it. You probably forget, but there's a person behind the screen that you're typing to. You're addressing her/him in all caps, as well as many others. What you're essentially doing is throwing a public tantrum in the boards over getting banned. If that doesn't demonstrate a real life negative attitude, I don't rightly know what does...
And what? His bad attitude is irrelevant. It's only your own behaviour that got you banned, and you have full control over your own behaviour and what you type. You also have a mute button to prevent people messaging/spamming you. So there was no excuse for the way you behaved. I'm sorry, but in League (and in life), you're gonna sometimes meet immature and negative people. But no matter who you come across, you always have the choice to behave maturely and maintain your composure.
It's not _about_ who you insult. It's about having a bad attitude in _any_ way at all. Have you not read the terms and conditions of this game? It clearly states that Riot can and will permanently suspend accounts that have been found to consistently demonstrate negative behaviour. It is literally as simple as if you can't say nice things, don't say anything.
: They remade leblanc and rengar because there was no counterplay and then ended up reverting the kits, bringing back the very same kits that were deemed unhealthy/unfun/no counterplay. Its riot. If its not broken, break it.
Well. Guess I just walked into that one {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}}
Volcan (EUNE)
: i got banned with out telling any bad word when actually my suport trolled and sarted flaming me
: >zoe is a toxic champion design how ?
If there isn't a problem with Zoe, why did they change Nidalee's Q? For all intents and purposes, they had identical Q's, but Nidalee's got changed and Zoe basically got Nidalee's old Q. The Q which got removed, _because_ it was a problem...
: I wish i was that good :D I have to agree that below plat or so mobility is a bit too important since positioning and peeling isn't as easy as dashing. The problem is that a moba without mobility would be uninteresting. Besides limiting creativity it really slows down the game. If nobody can get away from anybody it would boil down to a stat check. Which would also mean that you get punished even more for even the slightest postional mistake. IMO that would be even worse for the majority of players. Also any form of cc would be sooooo much more valuable. This would force you to be more passive and careful. Anyone who played games like Sins of a Solar Empire will understand what i mean. If a small step forward kills you, because you can't go back, you will be scared of everything. I personally prefer the way league is right now : forgiving for postional mistakes and because of that also more aggresive. I personally like many of the unmobile champs but i have to agree that unless you are basically maining them almost all of them (not you varus) struggle really hard right now. I am not sure what to do about them. Because of their design they are more dependend on team compositions, so they are harder to balance. But i really don't want reworks. This distince lack of mobility gives them a unique spot in the roster.
I think Riot is at least starting to go in the right direction with "anti-mobility" spells: {{champion:69}} W {{champion:27}} W {{champion:163}} W Still, immobile champions are in a sad spot, and continue to be...
meco78 (EUW)
: i will answer each of your following sentences . 1) what i mean by autestic kid =someoneselfish and just flame/curse. i dont know if you like to flame and curse but i rather not because in that wway i will be no more less than the kid who curse. Mature people wont bother their self to answer th flame /curse in-game . 2) when i say that . I know what im talking about .'the support is so easy dud' meme is so commun . 'i speaciefcly said who play and not who mastered' .idk if you notice the huge gap between those two words .Players got autofilled support and just think by playing brand or veigar they re good at support while they totaly neglige their adc . 3) no necessary saying i have level is to show it off to people. i have 4-5 support champs that are level 7 via 3 tokens but not enough BE . B ut the mean is in the matrise. i had 3 token with thresh and 1 shard and i didnt uped him untill i mastered him really well to a point to be right to have the lvl 7 mastery . 4) Im sorry if my post offended you in anyway i didnt mean it . and im open to share with you anything in terms to get a commun knowledge about this subject . im not the one who think his POV is beyond being false . im open for all and get all the critiques with open heart ^^
You still don't get how insulting you're being. Or how much of a hypocrite you are. You continue to complain about the abusive stereotypes towards supports, yet you make no attempt to correct your own vulgar stereotypes of autism. You literally stated that for you, autistic is "selfish, flaming, cursing", and by implication, immature. There is so much wrong with that.
: Reworking Aatrox is a gigantic mistake.
He's okay, but I wouldn't say he's massively original. And there are areas of his kit which feel underwhelming: -His slow gets smaller as it travels outwards, punishing you for trying to hit enemies further away. (You may as well get right in someone's face and fire it to reduce the chance of missing.) -His jump has a huge delay before you strike, and the knock-up hit-box is almost as bad as the stun hit-box on Heimerdinger's grenade. -His ult damage proc does magic damage for some bizarre reason when the rest of his kit does physical, and it's the only kind of burst in his kit. Overall, he just feels like he could be improved in some way.
meco78 (EUW)
You complain about stereotypes of support roles. Yet you use the phrase "autistic kids" to refer to people who bother you; a stereotypical and derogatory insult to everyone who has to endure living with autism. You then go on to complain about the arrogance of people who "think" they are support mains because they've mastered one champion, as a segue into telling other people what a support main "should be"; like _you_, with your mastery 7 in every support champion. How arrogant. Anyone can be a support main, they don't have to have wasted blue essence and money on loot boxes just to get the mastery 7 emotes, to demonstrate they are good at the support role. You should reassess your "point of view", because it's no less toxic than those of the people you criticise...
: supp heal always on q or stun on q never on w
These are the supports which have a heal or shield as their Q: >{{champion:44}} {{champion:497}} These are the supports which don't have heals or shields on their Q: >{{champion:432}} heal on W {{champion:40}} shield on E {{champion:43}} shield on E {{champion:117}} shield on E {{champion:99}} shield on W {{champion:25}} shield on E {{champion:267}} heal on W {{champion:76}} heal on E {{champion:37}} heal on W {{champion:16}} heal on W Conclusion: Supports heal's are NOT always on their Q. Supports heals are actually MORE OFTEN on W than Q (Bard, Soraka, Sona, Nami.) You couldn't have gotten it more wrong it you tried...
: she is a supp heal should be number 1 priority!
No? Different supports have different priorities. You have poking supports, healing/shielding supports, tank supports, hooking supports. It's not as simple as "all supports must heal." Also, why does her heal being on Q make it her "priority"? Q is no different from W or E, or even R. They're all just buttons, and any skill can go on any button. The only real exception here is that ultimate abilities almost always go on R. Anyway, if you're so bothered by Sona's heal being on W instead of Q, why don't you just change your controls in the settings?
: petition to swap sona's W and Q with each other!!!
Why? What difference would that even make?
Seikia (EUW)
: Arcade Riven's icon concept
Looks great, and matches the style of other Arcade icons. 10/10
: Why does surviving result in dying,
Confirmation bias. You don't notice the times when you DO escape and survive, because you're convinced of this new theory you have, and only notice the times where it DOES happen.
: In my opinion the gap in survivability gets a lot lower in higher elos and with coordinated teams. Because of that you don't really see champs in proplay getting chosen based on mobility (atleast not as the main reason).
I agree that survivability increases with higher elo, and that champions will be chosen for factors independent of mobility at that point. But Pro play and high elo (diamond, challenger), represent about 1-2% of the game's player-base. They're not representative of the "real" League of Legends that the average person plays. And in the real League of Legends, the abundance of mobility spells is persistently strangling out immobile champions from seeing play. Even in coordinated teams, I think it still largely depends on that team's elo as to whether or not they're choosing champions with mobility as at least a part of the deciding process. So, it seems to me that mobility spells are a more relevant problem to average players like us (forgive me for assuming you're not diamond or higher).
: The part i have to disagree with is the "lazy positioning" part. Since there are so many mobility abilities one has to be even more aware of the positions of every champ. Since the gap is closed way faster. Immobile champions being mostly irrelevant and underplayed is definetly true in most cases (but for mages).
Nah, they're training wheels. A get-out-of-jail-free card. They're great for new players who don't know how to position yet (to escape mistakes made). But they're also bad for new players, because said players then come to rely on champions with mobility spells, perpetuating the under-use of immobile champions. Champions like Zed and Riven who are allegedly high skill, are in fact extremely forgiving. I'll always be more impressed by an Anivia or Cassieopia that can survive a fight, than a Zed or Riven.
Show more


Level 54 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion